On 2016-08-15 21:32, Qu Wenruo wrote:
At 08/15/2016 10:10 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2016-08-15 10:08, Anand Jain wrote:
IMHO it's better to warn user about 2 devices RAID5 or 3 devices
RAID6.
Any comment is welcomed.
Based on looking at the code, we do in fact support 2/3 devic
At 08/15/2016 10:10 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2016-08-15 10:08, Anand Jain wrote:
IMHO it's better to warn user about 2 devices RAID5 or 3 devices RAID6.
Any comment is welcomed.
Based on looking at the code, we do in fact support 2/3 devices for
raid5/6 respectively.
Personall
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:32:25PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/15/2016 10:10 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
>> >On 2016-08-15 10:08, Anand Jain wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> IMHO it's better to warn user about 2 devices RAID5 or 3 devic
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:32:25PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 08/15/2016 10:10 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> >On 2016-08-15 10:08, Anand Jain wrote:
> >>
> >>
> IMHO it's better to warn user about 2 devices RAID5 or 3 devices RAID6.
>
> Any comment is welcomed.
>
> >>
On 2016-08-15 10:32, Anand Jain wrote:
On 08/15/2016 10:10 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2016-08-15 10:08, Anand Jain wrote:
IMHO it's better to warn user about 2 devices RAID5 or 3 devices
RAID6.
Any comment is welcomed.
Based on looking at the code, we do in fact support 2/3 devi
On 08/15/2016 10:10 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2016-08-15 10:08, Anand Jain wrote:
IMHO it's better to warn user about 2 devices RAID5 or 3 devices RAID6.
Any comment is welcomed.
Based on looking at the code, we do in fact support 2/3 devices for
raid5/6 respectively.
Personall
Have a look at this..
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg54779.html
--
RAID5&6 devs_min values are in the context of degraded volume.
RAID1&10.. devs_min values are in the context of healthy volume.
RAID56 is correct. We already have devs_max to know the number
of devices in
On 2016-08-15 10:08, Anand Jain wrote:
IMHO it's better to warn user about 2 devices RAID5 or 3 devices RAID6.
Any comment is welcomed.
Based on looking at the code, we do in fact support 2/3 devices for
raid5/6 respectively.
Personally, I agree that we should warn when trying to do this,
IMHO it's better to warn user about 2 devices RAID5 or 3 devices RAID6.
Any comment is welcomed.
Based on looking at the code, we do in fact support 2/3 devices for
raid5/6 respectively.
Personally, I agree that we should warn when trying to do this, but I
absolutely don't think we should s
On 2016-08-15 03:50, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Hi,
Recently I found that manpage of mkfs is saying minimal device number
for RAID5 and RAID6 is 2 and 3.
Personally speaking, although I understand that RAID5/6 only requires
1/2 devices for parity stripe, it is still quite strange behavior.
Under most ca
Hi,
Recently I found that manpage of mkfs is saying minimal device number
for RAID5 and RAID6 is 2 and 3.
Personally speaking, although I understand that RAID5/6 only requires
1/2 devices for parity stripe, it is still quite strange behavior.
Under most case, user use raid5/6 for striping A
11 matches
Mail list logo
