On 09/18/2014 09:45 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
>
> I'm sorry that the commit 'btrfs: Fix and enhance merge_extent_mapping()
> to insert best fitted extent map'
> has a V2 patch, so the one in tree is not up-to-data.
>
> Although the v2 change is quite small and it's relevantly dependent,
h the v2 change is quite small and it's relevantly dependent, so it
> should not be a pain change.
I think it is better to merge it to v3.17 since it is a regression of v3.17
kernel
Thanks
Miao
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
> ---- Original Message
> Subject: kernel int
change.
Thanks,
Qu
Original Message ----
Subject: kernel integration branch updated
From: Chris Mason
To: linux-btrfs
Date: 2014年09月18日 22:19
Hi everyone,
I've added a few more patches to the kernel integration branch, and
rebased onto rc5. This should be my last rebase befor
Hi everyone,
I've added a few more patches to the kernel integration branch, and
rebased onto rc5. This should be my last rebase before sending into
linux-next, please take a look.
It's still missing three patches from Josef, which we're updating. I
can put more patches on top, but I'd prefer n
Hi everyone,
I've pushed out a rebased integration tree with our patches so far. I'm
starting more tests now against Linus and linux-next.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 08:57:01PM +, Jan Schubert wrote:
> Jan Schubert GMX.li> writes:
>
> > Thx Hugo, I hit this error while trying to compile:
>
> Oh, and kernel is official 3.0, seems there is an "incompatible" ctree.h
> included...
>
> Everything else compiles fine.
Looks like th
Hugo Mills carfax.org.uk> writes:
>It includes the latest scrub patches, the compile fixes for gcc
> 4.6, and a selection of other, smaller features. Go forth and play.
I've to report a kernel crash after upgrading to this branch _and_ upgrading to
official kernel 301 (coming from plain 30).
Jan Schubert GMX.li> writes:
> Thx Hugo, I hit this error while trying to compile:
Oh, and kernel is official 3.0, seems there is an "incompatible" ctree.h
included...
Everything else compiles fine.
Thx,
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the bod
Hugo Mills carfax.org.uk> writes:
>It includes the latest scrub patches, the compile fixes for gcc
> 4.6, and a selection of other, smaller features. Go forth and play.
>
Thx Hugo, I hit this error while trying to compile:
# make dir-test
ls dir-test.c
dir-test.c
gcc -Wp,-MMD,./.dir-test.o.
All -
It's been a while, but I've finally managed to get the time to
re-work the integration branch, and it's up as integration-20110805 at
darksatanic.net:
http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/ integration-20110805
It includes the latest scrub patches, the compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.06.2011 23:19, Hugo Mills wrote:
> After a reorganisation of patches, and sending a bunch of them to
> Chris, I've also updated the integration branch to match that. It's
> available from:
>
> http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstabl
Just wanted to say thank you Hugo for doing this. The latest patch set may of
not
fixed my problem, but it is still nice to be able to see the progress being
made
to btrfs-progs in one area.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message t
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:50:29AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Jan Schmidt (5):
> > commands added
> > scrub ioctls
> > added check_mounted_where
> > scrub userland implementation
> > scrub added to manpage
> >
> > WuBo (1):
> > Btrfs-progs: Add chunk tree recove
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:47:36PM +0200, Andreas Philipp wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 30.06.2011 23:19, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > After a reorganisation of patches, and sending a bunch of them to
> > Chris, I've also updated the integration branch to match that.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0200, Andreas Philipp wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 30.06.2011 23:19, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > After a reorganisation of patches, and sending a bunch of them to
> > Chris, I've also updated the integration branch to match that.
On Thursday 30 of June 2011 23:19:02 Hugo Mills wrote:
>After a reorganisation of patches, and sending a bunch of them to
> Chris, I've also updated the integration branch to match that. It's
> available from:
>
> http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/
> integration-20110630
> Jan Schmidt (5):
> commands added
> scrub ioctls
> added check_mounted_where
> scrub userland implementation
> scrub added to manpage
>
> WuBo (1):
> Btrfs-progs: Add chunk tree recover tool
>
I think we should wait for the kernel patch to be accepted before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.06.2011 23:19, Hugo Mills wrote:
> After a reorganisation of patches, and sending a bunch of them to
> Chris, I've also updated the integration branch to match that.
> It's available from:
>
> http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.06.2011 23:19, Hugo Mills wrote:
> After a reorganisation of patches, and sending a bunch of them to
> Chris, I've also updated the integration branch to match that.
> It's available from:
>
> http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstabl
After a reorganisation of patches, and sending a bunch of them to
Chris, I've also updated the integration branch to match that. It's
available from:
http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/ integration-20110630
The shortlog of 17 patches in this branch beyond the ones I've
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:03:30PM +0200, Andreas Philipp wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 27.06.2011 14:43, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:10:22PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >> I've just updated the btrfs-progs integration branch I've been
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27.06.2011 14:43, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:10:22PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
>> I've just updated the btrfs-progs integration branch I've been
>> keeping. Not a huge amount new since last time:
>>
>> Andreas Philipp (1):
>>
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:10:22PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
>I've just updated the btrfs-progs integration branch I've been
> keeping. Not a huge amount new since last time:
>
> Andreas Philipp (1):
> print parent ID in btrfs subvolume list
dunno if this has been mentioned already, but
I've just updated the btrfs-progs integration branch I've been
keeping. Not a huge amount new since last time:
Andreas Philipp (1):
print parent ID in btrfs subvolume list
Goffredo Baroncelli (1):
Scan the devices listed in /proc/partitions
Hugo Mills (1):
mkfs.btrfs: Fix co
24 matches
Mail list logo
