On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 16:19 +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 21. August 2014, 17:52:16 schrieb Gui Hecheng:
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 11:25 +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote:
Hi,
I did a checkout of the latest btrfs progs to repair my damaged
filesystem.
Running btrfs restore
On 22/8/2014 6:40 πμ, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hello people. Thank you for your detailed replies, esp Duncan.
In essence, I plan on using BTRFS for my production data -- mainly
programs/documents I write in connection with my academic research.
I'm not a professional sysadmin and I'm not
Hi Eric,
Am Donnerstag, 21. August 2014, 13:56:49 schrieb Eric Sandeen:
On 8/21/14, 1:42 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 8/20/14, 10:35 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
A memory problem reported by valgrind as follows:
=== Syscall param pwrite64(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
When running:
Konstantinos Skarlatos posted on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:56:55 +0300 as
excerpted:
I would stay with rsync for a while, because there is always the
possibility of a bug that corrupts both your primary filesystem and your
backup one, or send propagating corruption from one filesystem to
another
Marc MERLIN marc at merlins.org writes:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 05:52:01AM +, Mihail Zaporozhets wrote:
# btrfs-zero-log /dev/sda1
warning devid 5 not found already
Check tree block failed, want=16845270495232, have=0
read block failed check_tree_block
Am Freitag, 22. August 2014, 14:43:45 schrieb Gui Hecheng:
On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 16:19 +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 21. August 2014, 17:52:16 schrieb Gui Hecheng:
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 11:25 +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote:
Hi,
I did a checkout of the latest btrfs progs
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 10:42 +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote:
Am Freitag, 22. August 2014, 14:43:45 schrieb Gui Hecheng:
On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 16:19 +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 21. August 2014, 17:52:16 schrieb Gui Hecheng:
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 11:25 +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Konstantinos Skarlatos posted on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:56:55 +0300 as
excerpted:
I would stay with rsync for a while, because there is always the
possibility of a bug that corrupts both your primary filesystem and your
backup
On 2014-08-20 23:22, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hello. People on this list have been kind enough to reply to my
technical questions. However, seeing the high number of mails on this
list, esp with the title PATCH, I have a question about the
development itself:
Is this just an indication of a
Hello. I've seen repeated advices to use the latest kernel. While
hearing of the recent compression bug affecting recent kernels does
somewhat warn one off the previous advice, I would like to know what
people who are running regular distros do to get the latest kernel.
Personally I'm on Kubuntu,
On 2014-08-22 07:59, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hello. I've seen repeated advices to use the latest kernel. While
hearing of the recent compression bug affecting recent kernels does
somewhat warn one off the previous advice, I would like to know what
people who are running regular distros do to
Chris == Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com writes:
Chris Since the SD Card spec references a completely different command
Chris than the ATA spec (TRIM), I don't think either one of these are
Chris TRIM, even if functionally equivalent. Instead the SD Card
Chris ERASE_* commands are probably
On 22/8/2014 12:58 μμ, Filipe David Manana wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Konstantinos Skarlatos posted on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:56:55 +0300 as
excerpted:
I would stay with rsync for a while, because there is always the
possibility of a bug that
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 09:56:55AM +0300, Konstantinos Skarlatos wrote:
I would stay with rsync for a while, because there is always the
possibility of a bug that corrupts both your primary filesystem and
your backup one, or send propagating corruption from one filesystem
to another (Or maybe
Hello Zach!
Am 2014-08-21 um 23:25 schrieb Zach Brown:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 09:03:16PM +0200, Klaus Holler wrote:
Hello Hugo and Zach!
a big thanks to both of you!
Both Hugo's userspace workaround and
Zach's patch work fine for me - the /boot snapshot can be restored
completely as
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:29:29PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hello. I've seen repeated advices to use the latest kernel. While
hearing of the recent compression bug affecting recent kernels does
somewhat warn one off the previous advice, I would like to know what
people who are running
On 8/22/14, 2:35 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote:
Hi Eric,
Am Donnerstag, 21. August 2014, 13:56:49 schrieb Eric Sandeen:
On 8/21/14, 1:42 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 8/20/14, 10:35 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
A memory problem reported by valgrind as follows:
=== Syscall param pwrite64(buf) points to
On 8/20/14, 3:51 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
The crash is
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2124!
invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
...
---
v2:
- Improve the commit log to be clear, suggested by Eric.
Well, I had specifically asked for it to include details
Someone just told me yesterday they had the same problem, so I filed a
bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83041
Fairly often (over 20 times for me so far with various kernel versions),
when I reboot after a crash, my google-chrome profile is damaged in one
of 2 ways:
1) open tabs
On 8/22/14, 10:50 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
But if my kernel hangs due to a bug that isn't btrfs' fault and I need
to power off and back on, after reboot my google-chrome profile is
almost always broken in some way.
Given my experiences with userspace in general, I'd lay money on
google-chrome
Filipe David Manana posted on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:58:33 +0100 as
excerpted:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Konstantinos Skarlatos posted on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:56:55 +0300 as
excerpted:
I would stay with rsync for a while, because there is always the
Am Freitag, 22. August 2014, 17:29:29 schrieb Shriramana Sharma:
Hello. I've seen repeated advices to use the latest kernel. While
hearing of the recent compression bug affecting recent kernels does
somewhat warn one off the previous advice, I would like to know what
people who are running
Austin S Hemmelgarn posted on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:04:12 -0400 as
excerpted:
On 2014-08-22 07:59, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hello. I've seen repeated advices to use the latest kernel. While
hearing of the recent compression bug affecting recent kernels does
somewhat warn one off the previous
Marc MERLIN posted on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:50:40 -0700 as excerpted:
Fairly often (over 20 times for me so far with various kernel versions),
when I reboot after a crash, my google-chrome profile is damaged in one
of 2 ways:
1) open tabs don't reopen 2) google-chrome says that my profile is
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
ahferro...@gmail.com wrote:
I personally use Gentoo Unstable on all my systems, so I build all my
kernels locally anyway, and stay pretty much in-line with the current
stable Mainline kernel.
Gentoo Unstable probably means gentoo-sources,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
No claim to be a dev, btrfs or otherwise, here, but I believe in this
case you /are/ being too paranoid.
Both btrfs send and receive only deal with data/metadata they know how to
deal with. If it's corrupt in some way or if
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:32:27PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 8/22/14, 10:50 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
But if my kernel hangs due to a bug that isn't btrfs' fault and I need
to power off and back on, after reboot my google-chrome profile is
almost always broken in some way.
Given my
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 06:17:38PM +, Duncan wrote:
Marc MERLIN posted on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:50:40 -0700 as excerpted:
Fairly often (over 20 times for me so far with various kernel versions),
when I reboot after a crash, my google-chrome profile is damaged in one
of 2 ways:
1) open
On 2014-08-22 14:22, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
ahferro...@gmail.com wrote:
I personally use Gentoo Unstable on all my systems, so I build all my
kernels locally anyway, and stay pretty much in-line with the current
stable Mainline kernel.
Josef Bacik jba...@fb.com writes:
On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
Maybe else if was meant, but because of the goto out_unlock, it
doesn't make a difference. Anyway, I chose the only whitespace fix.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk
---
An interesting exercise saw me reading data from my RAID10 to a USB
device, which produced the following representative iostat:
Linux 3.14.17-1-lts (eanna) 08/22/2014 _x86_64_ (24 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
3.530.000.502.830.00 93.14
Hi there,
I think i just crashed my btrfs partition, is someone willing to guide
me through the recovery steps?
The crash went like so: I was testing the watchdog ability of my
Raspberry Pi, whose root filesystem is btrfs. To test if the watchdog
works I started a fork bomb. Normally, the
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 02:52:16AM +, Duncan wrote:
For mysql, I got:
InnoDB: Page directory corruption:
infimum not pointed to 140708 11:53:58
InnoDB: Page dump in ascii and hex (16384 bytes):
len 16384; hex (16KB of 0's).
Is that on ssd or spinning rust, and if ssd, do
G. Richard Bellamy posted on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:36:22 -0700 as excerpted:
An interesting exercise saw me reading data from my RAID10 to a USB
device, which produced the following representative iostat:
Linux 3.14.17-1-lts (eanna) 08/22/2014 _x86_64_ (24 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:32:13AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 8/20/14, 3:51 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
The crash is
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2124!
invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
...
---
v2:
- Improve the commit log to be clear,
The crash is
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2124!
invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
...
CPU: 3 PID: 88 Comm: kworker/u8:7 Not tainted 3.17.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc22.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
Workqueue:
The crash is
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2124!
invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
...
CPU: 3 PID: 88 Comm: kworker/u8:7 Not tainted 3.17.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc22.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
Workqueue:
Florian Gamböck posted on Sat, 23 Aug 2014 00:00:46 +0200 as excerpted:
I think i just crashed my btrfs partition, is someone willing to guide
me through the recovery steps?
A month or so ago I had a similar problem, and got some experience with
real recovery, that I hadn't had previous
Marc MERLIN posted on Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:10:55 -0700 as excerpted:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 02:52:16AM +, Duncan wrote:
For mysql, I got:
InnoDB: Page directory corruption:
infimum not pointed to 140708 11:53:58 InnoDB: Page dump in ascii and
hex (16384 bytes):
len 16384; hex
39 matches
Mail list logo
