laptop alternatingly and sync at each switchover,
but the potential problem only would come if I modify both (something
like having to do git merge, I guess).
Has anyone come across this situation and evolved any policies to handle it?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
Hello can you elaborate a bit on the workflow as to how you use svn for that?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
the fd command in the subject line is...
:-)
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
non-superuser can't
really do anything active (whether creating or deleting) with */sbin
commands, but only querying (like ifconfig, btrfs subvol list etc). So
this is not really hybrid of anything it seems.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
with any other FS, I do think I'd not like my files to occupy
more than 90% or so since even then defrag would probably not work.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
on the openSUSE Forum...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
. No idea why this is the openSUSE default...)
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
the additional (regular) df command to find
out that info, IMO.
Anyone have any objection to my submitting a bug requesting this
additional info to be printed?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body
running)
but I don't understand why these have to be created in the first
place? (I just used SuSE Tumbleweed's default mkfs.btrfs without any
-m or -d options.)
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:23 AM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:45:10PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:26 PM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
Works for me without the root password on a Tumbleweed installation
(without apparmor
on system chunks.
Pass --force if you really want to do that.
So I did give --force. (Is it the same as -f?)
I hope that was OK?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Robert White rwh...@pobox.com wrote:
If those disappeared, or got stripped off onto other drives then not-amusing
things would happen.
Well after doing btrfs bal start path -mprofiles=single, the FS is
still working...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா
From what I'm reading, thin metadata and nohole options were
introduced to make the FS more efficient. Does this mean that for
someone about to do mkfs.btrfs, it is actively recommended to use
these options?
Another pertinent question -- why aren't they default then?
--
Shriramana Sharma
.)
I am now reading a SuSECon 2013 presentation by Nyers and Schnell but
they are very generic about the recommendations.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:26 PM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
Works for me without the root password on a Tumbleweed installation
(without apparmor/selinux).
Are you then referring to a btrfs partition mounted with user_subvol_rm_allowed?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
, no? Or is it
some sort of trash vs (real) delete mechanism?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
by
default but not any of the others. Is that a SuSE-specific
modification or upstream?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
test1/
$ btr sub list .
ID 257 gen 10 top level 5 path test1
ID 258 gen 10 top level 5 path test2
ID 259 gen 9 top level 257 path test1/foo
$
So now what is the meaning of top level?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
ahferro...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my approach to things:
Wow, thanks a lot people! I'm really benefiting from your experience here.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
like using the higher-level trash instead of lower-level rm, so
that even after we delete, it's still available...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89091.
As I requested there, I prefer for confirmation by default and -f to
force otherwise, rather than behaviour of rm which requires -i to ask
confirmation.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux
) would
work? Like in ~/.bashrc:
export BTRFS_SUBVOLUME_DELETE_CONFIRM=1
Ideas?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
, or you can only specify read-only while
creating them?
IIUC you can only specify RO while creating but you can always cheaply
create a RW snapshot of an RO one or an RO snapshot of an RW one...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
But isn't it just possible to move i.e. reparent a
subvol so I can move these two under another subvol and have that as
default?
You can move subvolumes.
OK so I just found out that just mv test1/foo test2/ where
and btrfsprogs 3.17) requires me to enter the root
password before creating a subvol (or in fact running anything under
/sbin or /usr/sbin).
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord
have a few subvols in my external HDD
which is entirely formatted as BtrFS and if I just mount the external
HDD /dev/sdc1 I am able to access all the subvols' contents as well.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Shriramana Sharma samj...@gmail.com wrote:
Why should noCoW affect cp --reflink anyhow? I just created a 500 MiB
file from /dev/urandom under a chattr +C-ed dir, and copied to another
subvol using cp --reflink, and fi df still shows 500 MiB, not 1 GiB.
Looks
Attached patch.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Shriramana Sharma samj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Shriramana Sharma samj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello. There seem to be lots of questions in various forums re the
output of btrfs fi df -- especially w.r.t. the usage
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
In the data structures on disk, it's 5. The kernel aliases 0 to
mean subvolid 5.
So why 5 and not just 0 which seems a logical choice? On top of this,
one needs to alias 0 to 5!
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Shriramana Sharma samj...@gmail.com wrote:
So why 5 and not just 0 which seems a logical choice? On top of this,
one needs to alias 0 to 5!
Attached patch clarifying this in the documentation. (Should have done
this with the previous mail. Sorry for multiple
snapshotted less often?
3) sent/received any differently?
Thanks.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
f
do
[ -d $f ] mkdir target/$f touch target/$f -r $f
[ -f $f ] cp -a --reflink $f target/ rm $f
done
Again, what would happen to files which are not regular directories or files?
And why isn't --reflink given a single letter alias for cp?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
the improvement is in-built.
That's nice to know!
Any idea when the next coreutils point release with this will be out?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
they mount root using subvolid, or subvol name or such?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
reset by a
mkfs.btrfs, but 5 is only the default subvol (mounted when the FS as a
whole is mounted without subvol spec) provided by mkfs.btrfs, and
subvol set-default can have another subvol mounted as default instead,
after which 5 can actually be deleted?
[confused]...
--
Shriramana Sharma
the root subvol will not snapshot any subvols
under it.
So is there any way to undo a subvol delete?
[If no, then ordinary users should probably prefer regular directories
to subvols.]
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Is_btrfs_stable.3F still
reads experimental whereas the warning has been removed in the tools
recently IIUC. The FAQ item to be updated, no?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
N�r��yb�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+{�n�߲)w* jg��� �ݢj
page or this requirement should not
be there...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
line option.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Shriramana Sharma samj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello. There seem to be lots of questions in various forums re the
output of btrfs fi df -- especially w.r.t. the usage of the word
total. For example see https://community.oracle.com/thread/2459838
I feel it would
form is felt unclear). It would
also help people understand the output of regular df on a btrfs system
since one can understand easier that pre-allocated space would count
as used space as it is not free!
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
site?!
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 8/17/14, Shriramana Sharma samj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello. One more Q re generic BTRFS behaviour.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page specifically
advertises BTRFS's Space-efficient packing of small files.
Hello. I realized that while I got lots of interesting advice on how
their review...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
, which provides mainline kernels till a
particular point but not beyond that.
Do people here always compile the latest kernel themselves just to get
the latest BTRFS stability fixes (and improvements, though as a
second priority)?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe
to COW and atomic
operations, and I can always retry send/receive again. Is this
correct?
If yes, then I guess I can take the plunge but ensure I have daily
backups (which BTRFS itself should help me do easily).
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
!
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
. If this reason is going to be
affected seriously, then I'll return to BTRFS a year hence as was
suggested elsewhere...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
be a different way to provide crash
resistance.
But since BTRFS doesn't have journaling, it seems that this suggestion
to disable COW on the image file to avoid defragmentation would only
make it vulnerable to data corruption.
Comments please? Thanks!
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா
.
I tried this out, and sure enough, just because chattr +C was applied,
my change in the snapshot did not reflect in the original subvolume.
So nocow via chattr +C only means don't do COW unless this file
exists in another snapshot, right?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
50 matches
Mail list logo
