[PATCH v5 2/5] clk: sunxi: Add a driver for the PLL2

The PLL2 on the A10 and later SoCs is the clock used for all the audio related operations. This clock has a somewhat complex output tree, with three outputs (2X, 4X and 8X) with a fixed divider from the base clock, and an output (1X) with a post divider. However, we can simplify things since the

[PATCH v5 4/5] clk: sunxi: codec clock support

From: Emilio López The codec clock on sun4i, sun5i and sun7i is a simple gate with PLL2 as parent. Add a driver for such a clock. Signed-off-by: Emilio López Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard

[PATCH V5 1/6] i2c: Add i2c support to Freescale Layerscape platforms

From: Shaohui Xie Modify the I2C_IMX config to support to Layerscape platforms. Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu Signed-off-by: Wenbin Song Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang --- V5: V4 V3 V2 - No

[PATCH V5 2/6] watchdog: Add support for Freescale Layerscape platforms

From: Shaohui Xie Modify watchdog/Kconfig file to support Layerscape platforms. Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie Signed-off-by: Wenbin Song Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang Acked-by: Guenter Roeck

[PATCH V5 5/6] clk: qoriq: Add ls1043a support.

From: Hou Zhiqiang Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang Acked-by: Stephen Boyd --- V5: V4 V3 V2 - No change. drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c | 38 ++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git

[PATCH V5 6/6] dts/ls1043a: add LS1043ARDB board support

From: Shaohui Xie Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu Signed-off-by: Wenbin Song Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang --- V5: V4 V3 - No change. V2: -

[PATCH V5 4/6] arm64/ls1043a: add DTS for Freescale LS1043A SoC

From: Mingkai Hu LS1043a is an SoC with 4 ARMv8 A53 cores and most other IP blocks similar to LS1021a which complies to Chassis 2.1 spec. Following levels of DTSI/DTS files have been created for the LS1043A SoC family: - fsl-ls1043a.dtsi: DTS-Include file for FSL

[PATCH V5 3/6] Documentation: DT: Add entry for FSL LS1043ARDB board

From: Mingkai Hu Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang --- V5: V4 V3 V2 - No change. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.txt | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] clk: sunxi: Add a driver for the PLL2

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The PLL2 on the A10 and later SoCs is the clock used for all the audio > related operations. > > This clock has a somewhat complex output tree, with three outputs (2X, 4X > and 8X) with a fixed divider from

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 20:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:37:57PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 08:29:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:57:50PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > I can't see adding calls

Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] clk: Add a basic multiplier clock

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Some clocks are using a multiplier component, however, unlike their mux, > gate or divider counterpart, these factors don't have a basic clock > implementation. > > This leads to code duplication across

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:44:41AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 20:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:37:57PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 08:29:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:29:40PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 15:50 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > But the point I'm making is that we are working towards *fixing* that, > > > and *not* using DT-specific code in places where we should be using the > > > generic APIs. >

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:29 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 15:50 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> > But the point I'm making is that we are working towards *fixing* that, >> > and *not* using DT-specific code in places where we should be using the >> >

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

On Monday, October 19, 2015 10:58:25 AM Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:29 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 15:50 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > But the point I'm making is that we are working towards *fixing* that, > >> > and *not* using

Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: samsung: exynos4: Add SSS gate clock

On 10/19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Add a gate clock for controlling all clocks of Security Sub System > (SSS). > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > --- The To: list is huge, so I have no idea if you want me to apply this patch or not, and given that it's part of

Re: [Resend Patch v6] driver/clk/clk-si5338: Add common clock framework driver for si5338

On 10/16/2015 04:05 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/16, York Sun wrote: >> >> >> On 10/16/2015 02:31 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 10/16, York Sun wrote: On 10/09/2015 05:09 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/09, York Sun wrote: >> +/* >> + * To support multiple si5338

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

Hello, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:43:24PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > It's a bit ironic that you've chosen GPIO as an example there. The > "new" GPIO API (the gpiod_* stuff) only has a fwnode way to get the > gpio descriptor. There's no of_* method. Without following all that

Re: [PATCH] clk: iproc: Fix PLL output frequency calculation

On 10/16, Ray Jui wrote: > From: Simran Rai > > This patch affects the clocks that use fractional ndivider in their > PLL output frequency calculation. Instead of 2^20 divide factor, the > clock's ndiv integer shift was used. Fixed the bug by replacing ndiv > integer shift

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: Enable Exynos RNG module

On 20.10.2015 01:11, Tobias Jakobi wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > I can confirm that this also works on a Odroid-X2, so I guess it's safe > to enable the PRNG for all Exynos4412-based Odroid devices. Sure, I can send a patch for that. I can test it later also on Odroid-U3. > > Any chance that

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:27:44PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:43:24PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> > It's a bit ironic that you've chosen GPIO as

Re: [Resend Patch v6] driver/clk/clk-si5338: Add common clock framework driver for si5338

On 10/20, York Sun wrote: > Sorry for top posting. I am on outlook web. > > We have no problem with device tree. Let's put it aside. > > When device is not used, the platform data is used to hold the data, filled > by a platform device before probing the clock. For my case, the platform >

Re: [PATCH 6/9] clk: keystone: fix a trivial typo

On 10/18, Geliang Tang wrote: > s/regsiter/register/ > > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang > --- Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, October 19, 2015 10:58:25 AM Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:29 AM, David Woodhouse >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 15:50 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> >> > But

Re: [Resend Patch v6] driver/clk/clk-si5338: Add common clock framework driver for si5338

On 10/19, York Sun wrote: > > > On 10/16/2015 04:05 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 10/16, York Sun wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 10/16/2015 02:31 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> On 10/16, York Sun wrote: > > > On 10/09/2015 05:09 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 10/09, York Sun wrote:

Re: [PATCH] clk: iproc: Fix PLL output frequency calculation

On 10/19/2015 02:55 PM, Ray Jui wrote: > > > On 15-10-19 02:49 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 10/16, Ray Jui wrote: >>> From: Simran Rai >>> >>> This patch affects the clocks that use fractional ndivider in their >>> PLL output frequency calculation. Instead of 2^20 divide

[PATCH v2] clk: iproc: Fix PLL output frequency calculation

From: Simran Rai This patch affects the clocks that use fractional ndivider in their PLL output frequency calculation. Instead of 2^20 divide factor, the clock's ndiv integer shift was used. Fixed the bug by replacing ndiv integer shift with 2^20 factor. Signed-off-by:

Re: [Resend Patch v6] driver/clk/clk-si5338: Add common clock framework driver for si5338

Sorry for top posting. I am on outlook web. We have no problem with device tree. Let's put it aside. When device is not used, the platform data is used to hold the data, filled by a platform device before probing the clock. For my case, the platform device is a PCIe device. It is a

[PATCH v5] clk: add CS2000 Fractional-N driver

From: Kuninori Morimoto This patch adds CS2000 Fractional-N driver as clock provider. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto --- v4 -> v5 - remove "clock-frequency" - use dev on clk_register() - remove CLK_IS_BASIC - .enable ->

Re: [Resend Patch v6] driver/clk/clk-si5338: Add common clock framework driver for si5338

On 10/19/2015 05:36 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/20, York Sun wrote: >> Sorry for top posting. I am on outlook web. >> >> We have no problem with device tree. Let's put it aside. >> >> When device is not used, the platform data is used to hold the data, filled >> by a platform device before

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

Hi Russell, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> > What you can do is print those devices which have failed to probe at >> > late_initcall() time - possibly augmenting that with reports from >> > subsystems showing what resources are not

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:21:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Russell, > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > >> > What you can do is print those devices which have failed to probe at > >> > late_initcall() time - possibly

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've bisected boot failures in next-20151016 down to patches in this branch: >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Tomeu Vizoso >>