Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM (dropped packets on binding device)

2013-07-12 Thread Ulrich Windl
a.org] Im Auftrag von Lars > Marowsky-Bree > Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Juli 2013 11:09 > An: General Linux-HA mailing list > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM > > On 2013-07-12T11:05:32, Wengatz Herbert wrote: > >> Seeing the high

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-12 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree schrieb am 12.07.2013 um 11:08 in Nachricht <20130712090853.gm19...@suse.de>: > On 2013-07-12T11:05:32, Wengatz Herbert wrote: > >> Seeing the high dropping quote... (just compare this to the other NIC) - have > you tried a new cable? Maybe it's a cheap hardware problem..

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-12 Thread Wengatz Herbert
endet: Freitag, 12. Juli 2013 11:09 An: General Linux-HA mailing list Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM On 2013-07-12T11:05:32, Wengatz Herbert wrote: > Seeing the high dropping quote... (just compare this to the other NIC) - have > you tried a new c

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-12 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-07-12T11:05:32, Wengatz Herbert wrote: > Seeing the high dropping quote... (just compare this to the other NIC) - have > you tried a new cable? Maybe it's a cheap hardware problem... The drop rate is normal. A slave NIC in a bonded active/passive configuration will drop all packets. I

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-12 Thread Wengatz Herbert
-Bree Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013 11:20 An: General Linux-HA mailing list Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM On 2013-07-11T08:41:33, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > For a really silly idea, but can you swap the network cards for a test? > > Say

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-11 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-07-11T08:41:33, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > For a really silly idea, but can you swap the network cards for a test? > > Say, with Intel NICs, or even another Broadcom model? > Unfortunately no: The 4-way NIC is onboard, and all slots are full. Too bad. But then you could really try raising

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-10 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree schrieb am 10.07.2013 um 23:56 in Nachricht <20130710215655.ge5...@suse.de>: > On 2013-07-10T14:33:12, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >> > Network problems in hypervisors though also have a tendency to be, well, >> > due to the hypervisor, or some network cards (broadcom?). >> >>

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-07-10T14:33:12, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > Network problems in hypervisors though also have a tendency to be, well, > > due to the hypervisor, or some network cards (broadcom?). > > Yes: > driver: bnx2 > version: 2.1.11 > firmware-version: bc 5.2.3 NCSI 2.0.12 For a really silly idea, but

[Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-10 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree schrieb am 10.07.2013 um 13:41 in >>> Nachricht <20130710114131.gb18...@suse.de>: > On 2013-07-10T08:31:17, Ulrich Windl > wrote: > >> I had reported about terrible performance of cLVM (maybe related to using > OCFS also) when uses in SLES11 SP2. I guesses cLVM (or OCFS