On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:57:19PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Florian Haas schrieb am 28.11.2011 um 15:05 in
> >>> Nachricht
> :
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
> > wrote:
> > >> Why? It seems "typeset" is the POSIX thing, while "local" is a BASH-ism.
> > >> So
>
>>> Florian Haas schrieb am 28.11.2011 um 15:05 in
>>> Nachricht
:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
> wrote:
> >> Why? It seems "typeset" is the POSIX thing, while "local" is a BASH-ism.
> >> So
> what's wrong with local variables?
> >
> > local is almost certainly not a b
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 28.11.2011 um 14:53 in
Nachricht <2028135344.GB3542@squib>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 02:41:42PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Ulrich Windl
> > wrote:
> > Florian Haas schrieb am 25.11.2011 um 14:35
> > in
>>> Florian Haas schrieb am 28.11.2011 um 14:41 in
>>> Nachricht
:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
> Florian Haas schrieb am 25.11.2011 um 14:35 in
> > Nachricht <4ecf99ae.8050...@hastexo.com>:
> >
> > [...]
> >> ... and I just morphed that patch into a git branch.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> Why? It seems "typeset" is the POSIX thing, while "local" is a BASH-ism. So
>> what's wrong with local variables?
>
> local is almost certainly not a bashism. At least I can recall
> once changing typeset to local in some RA.
IIRC, the
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 08:38:11AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Lars Ellenberg schrieb am 25.11.2011 um 13:18
> >>> in
> Nachricht <2025121816.GB7722@barkeeper1-xen.linbit>:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:09:51PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > >>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 21.1
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 02:41:42PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
> Florian Haas schrieb am 25.11.2011 um 14:35 in
> > Nachricht <4ecf99ae.8050...@hastexo.com>:
> >
> > [...]
> >> ... and I just morphed that patch into a git branch. U
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Ulrich Windl
wrote:
Florian Haas schrieb am 25.11.2011 um 14:35 in
> Nachricht <4ecf99ae.8050...@hastexo.com>:
>
> [...]
>> ... and I just morphed that patch into a git branch. Ulrich, as much as
>> we're all grateful for contributions to resource agents, _pl
>>> Florian Haas schrieb am 25.11.2011 um 14:35 in
Nachricht <4ecf99ae.8050...@hastexo.com>:
[...]
> ... and I just morphed that patch into a git branch. Ulrich, as much as
> we're all grateful for contributions to resource agents, _please_ don't
> mix functional modification with "cleanup" such
>>> Lars Ellenberg schrieb am 25.11.2011 um 13:18 in
Nachricht <2025121816.GB7722@barkeeper1-xen.linbit>:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:09:51PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > >>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 21.11.2011 um 16:11
> > >>> in
> > Nachricht <2021151134.GB3600@squib>:
> >
> >
On 11/25/11 13:18, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:09:51PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 21.11.2011 um 16:11 in
>> Nachricht <2021151134.GB3600@squib>:
>>
>> [...]
>>> This RA could certainly be improved. Patches welcome!
>>
>> OK, I tried a l
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:09:51PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 21.11.2011 um 16:11 in
> Nachricht <2021151134.GB3600@squib>:
>
> [...]
> > This RA could certainly be improved. Patches welcome!
>
> OK, I tried a little, removing a lot. IMHO the new version is
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 21.11.2011 um 16:11 in
Nachricht <2021151134.GB3600@squib>:
[...]
> This RA could certainly be improved. Patches welcome!
OK, I tried a little, removing a lot. IMHO the new version is better than the
previous one, but scores may vary. Anyway, you'll hate me
13 matches
Mail list logo
