On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Stallmann, Andreas wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>> According to your configuration, it can be up to 60s before we'll detect a
>> change in external connectivity.
>> Thats plenty of time for the cluster to start resources.
>> Maybe shortening the monitor interval will hel
Hi Andrew,
> According to your configuration, it can be up to 60s before we'll detect a
> change in external connectivity.
> Thats plenty of time for the cluster to start resources.
> Maybe shortening the monitor interval will help you.
TNX for the suggestion, I'll try that. Any suggestions on r
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Stallmann, Andreas
wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> Hi Lars!
>
>> You are exercising complete cluster communication loss.
>> Which is cluster split brain.
> Correct, yes.
>
>> If you are specifically exercising cluster split brain, why are you
>> surprised that you get exac
Il giorno Mer 27 Apr 2011 12:04:57 CET, Stallmann, Andreas ha scritto:
> Hi!
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: RaSca [mailto:ra...@miamammausalinux.org]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. April 2011 11:28
>> As far as I remember the master suggestion was to use ping instead of pingd,
>> so... Try
Hi Lars,
Hi Lars!
> You are exercising complete cluster communication loss.
> Which is cluster split brain.
Correct, yes.
> If you are specifically exercising cluster split brain, why are you surprised
> that you get exactly that?
Because ping(d) is supposed to keep ressources from starting on
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:11:44AM +, Stallmann, Andreas wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've two cluster-nodes, both running pingd (as a clone), to keep ressources
> from starting on nodes which have not obvious connection to the network. The
> ping-nodes are:
>
>
> -appl01 (10.10.10.202)
>
> -
Il giorno Mer 27 Apr 2011 11:11:44 CET, Stallmann, Andreas ha scritto:
> Hi!
> I've two cluster-nodes, both running pingd (as a clone), to keep ressources
> from starting on nodes which have not obvious connection to the network. The
> ping-nodes are:
[...]
> Any ideas?
> Thanks for your help,
A
Hi!
I've two cluster-nodes, both running pingd (as a clone), to keep ressources
from starting on nodes which have not obvious connection to the network. The
ping-nodes are:
-appl01 (10.10.10.202)
-appl02 (10.10.10.203)
-Default GW (10.10.10.254)
Before shutting down
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:52:38PM +0100, Nico Faerber wrote:
> Salute
>
> I have some troubles setting up a pingd clone resource.
> I'm using pacemaker 1.0.8 with corosync 1.2.0 running on a ubuntu 10.04.
>
> after setting up the resource crm/configure/show gives this:
>
> primitive pingd
Salute
I have some troubles setting up a pingd clone resource.
I'm using pacemaker 1.0.8 with corosync 1.2.0 running on a ubuntu 10.04.
after setting up the resource crm/configure/show gives this:
primitive pingd ocf:pacemaker:pingd \
params host_list="192.168.250.55" multiplier="100" \
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Scheffler Heinz wrote:
> Hello
>
> I configured pingd as a clone resource. Now pingd crashed and the
> cluster did a failover.
Can you show us the configuration of you pingd resource?
> Real pingd messages with a failed network
> resource looks different Our
Hello
I configured pingd as a clone resource. Now pingd crashed and the
cluster did a failover. Real pingd messages with a failed network
resource looks different Our network admins can't detect any
failures at the given time.
Does anybody know, what the pingd syslog messages mean?
Thanks a
: Mittwoch, 24. März 2010 15:39
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] pingd - rules - problem
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Scheffler Heinz wrote:
> I use dumpen="60s" until my first tests.
Perhaps make it higher.
> Maybe the order of the rules are relevan
a.org
> [mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Scheffler Heinz
> Sent: Mittwoch, 24. März 2010 14:12
> To: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] pingd - rules - problem
>
> My DTD requires type="number". Anyway, it is a cosmetically correction -
HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] pingd - rules - problem
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Scheffler Heinz wrote:
> My DTD requires type="number". Anyway, it is a cosmetically correction - the
> behavior of the cluster is the same. "Number" seems to be the default
HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] pingd - rules - problem
My DTD requires type="number". Anyway, it is a cosmetically correction - the
behavior of the cluster is the same. "Number" seems to be the default.
The rules are working correct 90% works good. There is a timing pro
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Scheffler Heinz wrote:
> My DTD requires type="number". Anyway, it is a cosmetically correction - the
> behavior of the cluster is the same. "Number" seems to be the default.
> The rules are working correct 90% works good. There is a timing problem,
> depending o
defaultgateway first.
-Original Message-
From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
[mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Beekhof
Sent: Mittwoch, 24. März 2010 11:54
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] pingd - rules - problem
Expressions like these:
Expressions like these:
Should include type="integer" so that the cluster does the correct
type of comparison.
Try that and let us know if it improves things.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Scheffler Heinz
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a corosync-pacemaker Cluster with two nodes (mutual takeove
Hello
I have a corosync-pacemaker Cluster with two nodes (mutual takeover). All
resource locations on one node depending on the nodes network connectivitiy.
pingd-depending rules for the ip interfaces in a base - group and then
colocations for all other groups. I wrote rules around pingd for
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:24 PM, tomtom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> if I use pingd and a host_list,
> how could a configuration to ensure a resource e.g. "VIP"
> runs on the host which reaches the most of host_list hosts?
>
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.0/html/Pacemaker_Explained/ch0
Hi all,
if I use pingd and a host_list,
how could a configuration to ensure a resource e.g. "VIP"
runs on the host which reaches the most of host_list hosts?
Thanks for your reply in advance.
Thomas.
--
sent via tiri messaging -
Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Montag, 22. Juni 2009 10:13:28 schrieb Alex Orlov:
>> Hi!
>>
>> How configure pingd on newly created cluster?
>> Where i can read about?
>>
>> http://linux-ha.org/pingd - Page not found.
>>...
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Example_configurations#Failover_IP__Se
Am Montag, 22. Juni 2009 10:13:28 schrieb Alex Orlov:
> Hi!
>
> How configure pingd on newly created cluster?
> Where i can read about?
>
> http://linux-ha.org/pingd - Page not found.
>
>
> ___
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http:
Hi!
How configure pingd on newly created cluster?
Where i can read about?
http://linux-ha.org/pingd - Page not found.
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.o
http://linux-ha.org/pingd - Page not found.
?
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Andrew Beekhof schrieb:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Patrick Roßbach
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are migrating from heartbeat v1 to v2 and also want to use pingd
>> instead of ipfail. Our two cluster nodes are connected to redundant
>> networks (two switches etc.) to communicate to the rest
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Patrick Roßbach
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are migrating from heartbeat v1 to v2 and also want to use pingd
> instead of ipfail. Our two cluster nodes are connected to redundant
> networks (two switches etc.) to communicate to the rest of the world.
> With v1 ipfail compar
Hi,
we are migrating from heartbeat v1 to v2 and also want to use pingd
instead of ipfail. Our two cluster nodes are connected to redundant
networks (two switches etc.) to communicate to the rest of the world.
With v1 ipfail compared the number of successful pings of both cluster
nodes to let
Hi,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:40:04AM +0200, alvarez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use pingd to check connectivity on my R2-style cluster. The
> cluster configuration is very simple at this time: just 2 nodes and 1 IPaddr
> resource.
> Each node has eth0 interface used for production traffi
Hi,
I would like to use pingd to check connectivity on my R2-style cluster. The
cluster configuration is very simple at this time: just 2 nodes and 1 IPaddr
resource.
Each node has eth0 interface used for production traffic and eth1
(cross-cable) for clustering. Pingd should check the eth0 gatew
Am Mittwoch, 1. April 2009 08:52:37 schrieb Dominik Klein:
> > I know. But this attrbiut does not exist in my setup. pacemaker verison
> > 1.0.1-1. Is this a feature of 1.0.2?
>
> 1.0.1 is 4 months old. The RA was updated with those features 3 months
> ago. So basically, yes. You could still update
> I know. But this attrbiut does not exist in my setup. pacemaker verison
> 1.0.1-1. Is this a feature of 1.0.2?
1.0.1 is 4 months old. The RA was updated with those features 3 months
ago. So basically, yes. You could still update the single RA from the
mercurial repository though.
Regards
Domin
Am Dienstag, 31. März 2009 16:03:28 schrieb Dominik Klein:
> Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 31. März 2009 15:27:47 schrieb Dominik Klein:
> >> Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am testing the pingd from the provider pacemaker. As Dominik told me,
> >>> there is no
Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 31. März 2009 15:27:47 schrieb Dominik Klein:
>> Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am testing the pingd from the provider pacemaker. As Dominik told me,
>>> there is no need to define ping nodes in the ha.cf any more. OK so far.
>>>
>>> As I
Am Dienstag, 31. März 2009 15:44:38 schrieb Michael Schwartzkopff:
> Am Dienstag, 31. März 2009 15:27:47 schrieb Dominik Klein:
> > Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am testing the pingd from the provider pacemaker. As Dominik told me,
> > > there is no need to define ping nodes
Am Dienstag, 31. März 2009 15:27:47 schrieb Dominik Klein:
> Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am testing the pingd from the provider pacemaker. As Dominik told me,
> > there is no need to define ping nodes in the ha.cf any more. OK so far.
> >
> > As I see pingd tries to reach all pin
Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am testing the pingd from the provider pacemaker. As Dominik told me, there
> is no need to define ping nodes in the ha.cf any more. OK so far.
>
> As I see pingd tries to reach all pingnodes of the hostlist attribute every
> 10
> seconds. Is it possibl
Hi,
I am testing the pingd from the provider pacemaker. As Dominik told me, there
is no need to define ping nodes in the ha.cf any more. OK so far.
As I see pingd tries to reach all pingnodes of the hostlist attribute every 10
seconds. Is it possible to pass an attribute to the pingd deamon to
You hit a pingd bug. The counter wraps around pingd wasn't able to handle it.
This and the logging is fixed for the next version.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:33, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a strange problem with one of my clusters last night. As far as
> I can see it it seems that the p
Hi,
I had a strange problem with one of my clusters last night. As far as
I can see it it seems that the pingd fails to do successful pings
after a certain period. Here is part of the logs from 1 node of my 2
node cluster :
Feb 12 03:37:21 slave1 pingd: [4744]: info: stand_alone_ping: Node
10.0.1
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] pingd with multiple networks
>
> Christian Charles wrote:
> > Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 02:42:35PM +0100, Christian Charles wrote:
> >>
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
[mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] Im Auftrag von Dominik Klein
Gesendet: Montag, 26. Januar 2009 08:03
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] pingd with multiple networks
Christian Charles
Christian Charles wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 02:42:35PM +0100, Christian Charles wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> i used the guide at http://www.linux-ha.org/PingdWithMultipleNetworks
>>> to monitor connectivity to 2 different nets and it works.
>>>
>>> I d
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 02:42:35PM +0100, Christian Charles wrote:
Hello,
i used the guide at http://www.linux-ha.org/PingdWithMultipleNetworks to
monitor connectivity to 2 different nets and it works.
I don't like that i have to create copies of /usr/lib/hea
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 02:42:35PM +0100, Christian Charles wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i used the guide at http://www.linux-ha.org/PingdWithMultipleNetworks to
> monitor connectivity to 2 different nets and it works.
>
> I don't like that i have to create copies of /usr/lib/heartbeat/pingd
> though
Hello,
i used the guide at http://www.linux-ha.org/PingdWithMultipleNetworks to
monitor connectivity to 2 different nets and it works.
I don't like that i have to create copies of /usr/lib/heartbeat/pingd
though, since it means i have to remember to update these copies
manually, when i updat
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 00:30, Alex Strachan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Non-symmetrical cluster
>> > All I get is
>> > Resource Group: group_its
>> >resource_its_drbd (heartbeat:its_drbddisk): Started itbaims
>> >resource_its_fs (ocf::heartbeat:its_Filesystem):Started
Non-symmetrical cluster
> > All I get is
> > Resource Group: group_its
> >resource_its_drbd (heartbeat:its_drbddisk): Started itbaims
> >resource_its_fs (ocf::heartbeat:its_Filesystem):Started
> > itbaims
> >resource_its_vip(ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr):Started
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 05:53, Alex Strachan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I upgraded the software to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] hb]# rpm -qa | egrep -i "pacemake|heartbeat|openais"
> libopenais2-0.80.3-11.1heartbeat-2.99.2-4.1
> libheartbeat2-2.99.2-4.1 heartbeat-resources
How do I define rsc=? in the location constraint?
How to get pingd to run?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ha-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Beekhof
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2008 9:05 PM
> To: General Linux-HA mailing list
> S
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:31, Adrian Chapela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof escribió:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 13:00, Adrian Chapela
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Alex Strachan escribió:
>>>
Hi All,
HA non-symmetrical cluster with two nodes; dtbaims,
Andrew Beekhof escribió:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 13:00, Adrian Chapela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Strachan escribió:
Hi All,
HA non-symmetrical cluster with two nodes; dtbaims, itbaims.
HA 2.99.1, pacemaker 1.0
You need to use a last version of Pacemaker, Pacemaker 1.0 st
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 13:00, Adrian Chapela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Strachan escribió:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> HA non-symmetrical cluster with two nodes; dtbaims, itbaims.
>> HA 2.99.1, pacemaker 1.0
>>
>
> You need to use a last version of Pacemaker, Pacemaker 1.0 stable has pingd
> broken
Alex Strachan escribió:
Hi All,
HA non-symmetrical cluster with two nodes; dtbaims, itbaims.
HA 2.99.1, pacemaker 1.0
You need to use a last version of Pacemaker, Pacemaker 1.0 stable has
pingd broken.
I am trying some config with pingd with bad results too. The last
Pacemaker seems to ha
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:21, Alex Strachan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> HA non-symmetrical cluster with two nodes; dtbaims, itbaims.
> HA 2.99.1, pacemaker 1.0
>
>
> I have been reviewing the pacemaker_configuration guide but no luck with
> this config. Lots of variations but no joy.
Hi All,
HA non-symmetrical cluster with two nodes; dtbaims, itbaims.
HA 2.99.1, pacemaker 1.0
I have been reviewing the pacemaker_configuration guide but no luck with
this config. Lots of variations but no joy.
Error:
Oct 30 16:58:35 dtbaims pengine: [27989]: WARN: native_color: Resource
pingd
Thank you for your response. Luckily I found it while I was searching
for an answer. Thank you http://www.gossamer-threads.com! Apparently
your response was eaten by our spam filter.
I was using the GUI and it wouldn't let me leave the value blank as
"" is blank. But after adding this constr
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 13:53 -0400, Chase Simms wrote:
> So now I am trying to use Pingd clones to monitor both connections and
> choose the best.
I think that requires different constraints. You can find fairly decent
examples here:
http://www.linux-ha.org/v2/faq/pingd
I chose to use the one wh
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 04:55:14PM +0200, Peter Th?mmel wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> we have 2 Servers, intend to run an failsave (Pro)Ftp_server.
>
> DRBD is running fine over an separate ethernet link, also used as heartbeat
> link.
>
>
>
> When i disconnect a server the other server shoul
Von: Peter Thümmel
Gesendet: Montag, 9. Juni 2008 14:55
An: 'linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org'
Betreff: Pingd and DRBD beginers question
Hi,
we have 2 Servers, intend to run an failsave (Pro)Ftp_server.
DRBD is running fine over an separate ethernet link, also used as heartbeat
link.
Peter Thümmel wrote:
Hi,
we have 2 Servers, intend to run an failsave (Pro)Ftp_server.
DRBD is running fine over an ethernet link.
When i disconnect a server the other server should go to primary-Status.
The drbd resource (V2) is installed an run fine.
The pingd is cloned and run
Hi,
we have 2 Servers, intend to run an failsave (Pro)Ftp_server.
DRBD is running fine over an ethernet link.
When i disconnect a server the other server should go to primary-Status.
The drbd resource (V2) is installed an run fine.
The pingd is cloned and run also fine.
Please hel
Brilliant, that was the charm.
Thanks Andrew.
On 04/04/2008, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just add:
>
>
>
> and everything should work
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm currently starting pingd in the ha.cf file but I'
Just add:
and everything should work
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently starting pingd in the ha.cf file but I'd like to use the
> crm to start it. I've tried using the example from
> http://www.linux-ha.org/v2/faq/pingd and the pingd reso
Hi,
I'm currently starting pingd in the ha.cf file but I'd like to use the
crm to start it. I've tried using the example from
http://www.linux-ha.org/v2/faq/pingd and the pingd resource looks like
it has started. Shouldn't I just need to change the attribute name in
the constraint to pingd-clone f
Adrian Chapela wrote:
Papp Tamás escribió:
Dear All,
I try to setup a HA firewall, still without real success.
I guess, I have to use pingd, the check, the connection is alive or not.
1.
I've made an example pingd resource with a host, which impossible to
ping and I see, the resource is stil
Papp Tamás escribió:
Dear All,
I try to setup a HA firewall, still without real success.
I guess, I have to use pingd, the check, the connection is alive or not.
1.
I've made an example pingd resource with a host, which impossible to
ping and I see, the resource is still running? Why? How sho
� wrote:
> Papp Tam�s wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I try to setup a HA firewall, still without real success.
>>
>> I guess, I have to use pingd, the check, the connection is alive or not.
>>
>> 1.
>> I've made an example pingd resource with a host, which impossible to
>> ping and I see, the resource i
Papp Tamás wrote:
Dear All,
I try to setup a HA firewall, still without real success.
I guess, I have to use pingd, the check, the connection is alive or not.
1.
I've made an example pingd resource with a host, which impossible to
ping and I see, the resource is still running? Why? How should
Dear All,
I try to setup a HA firewall, still without real success.
I guess, I have to use pingd, the check, the connection is alive or not.
1.
I've made an example pingd resource with a host, which impossible to
ping and I see, the resource is still running? Why? How should it be
used? What
On Dec 7, 2007 10:41 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2007, at 10:03 AM, China wrote:
>
> > Ok, but I don't understand why with
> >
> > pingd: 500
> > PC_A: 100
> > resource_stickiness: 100 (3 resources make 300)
> >
> > the resource failback. The expressions that you gi
On Dec 7, 2007, at 10:03 AM, China wrote:
Ok, but I don't understand why with
pingd: 500
PC_A: 100
resource_stickiness: 100 (3 resources make 300)
the resource failback. The expressions that you give me returns the
same
results like with:
pingd: 1000
PC_A: 100
resource_stickiness: 100 (3
Ok, but I don't understand why with
pingd: 500
PC_A: 100
resource_stickiness: 100 (3 resources make 300)
the resource failback. The expressions that you give me returns the same
results like with:
pingd: 1000
PC_A: 100
resource_stickiness: 100 (3 resources make 300)
but the behavior is differen
On Dec 6, 2007, at 5:15 PM, China wrote:
Thank you.
I've found the right score with the script:
pingd: +1000
PC_A: +100
resource_stickiness: +100 (I've 3 resources so make 300, not 100)
Now the problem is that i didn't understood why these score is ok for
failover and don't failback.
becaus
Thank you.
I've found the right score with the script:
pingd: +1000
PC_A: +100
resource_stickiness: +100 (I've 3 resources so make 300, not 100)
Now the problem is that i didn't understood why these score is ok for
failover and don't failback.
And why with pingd score 500 is good for failback to
China wrote:
Last question: how can I see what is the node's score during cluster
execution?
You can grep it out of the "ptest" output.
Or use my script:
http://lists.community.tummy.com/pipermail/linux-ha/2007-September/027488.html
which has been updated by Robert Lindgren:
http://lists.comm
Last question: how can I see what is the node's score during cluster
execution?
On Dec 6, 2007 2:59 PM, Dominik Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But, It's good to use a interface both for heartbeat and for services?
>
> It's pretty common I think.
> ___
But, It's good to use a interface both for heartbeat and for services?
And yes, If I pull the heartbeat's cable I'm in a split brain situation. But
it's not my problem now :D
On Dec 6, 2007 2:23 PM, Dominik Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> China wrote:
> > Sorry, I forgot it!
> >
> > I've two
But, It's good to use a interface both for heartbeat and for services?
It's pretty common I think.
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
China wrote:
Sorry, I forgot it!
I've two connection for the PCs:
one with crossover cable, where heartbeat send packets directly to other PC
one through network, where the services listen and where pingd test
connectivity
When I force the failure I disconnect the network cable that give servi
Sorry, I forgot it!
I've two connection for the PCs:
one with crossover cable, where heartbeat send packets directly to other PC
one through network, where the services listen and where pingd test
connectivity
When I force the failure I disconnect the network cable that give services
from PC_A.
With this configuration the resources doesn't failover to test, but remains
on test-ppc. Why?
I can't say. The configuration looks good to me.
But again:
What are you doing to force the failure?
Do you really have just one connection between the nodes and unplug that
connection to force the
This is my new cib.xml:
China wrote:
Ok, I've set resource_stickiness to 150, a score of 100 to the default node
PC_A and a score_attribute for pingd. Now the resource when fail doesn't
start on PC_B. Why?
The way I understand you, and please correct me or post your current
cib.xml, is:
pingd multiplier: 200 (as su
Ok, I've set resource_stickiness to 150, a score of 100 to the default node
PC_A and a score_attribute for pingd. Now the resource when fail doesn't
start on PC_B. Why?
On Dec 6, 2007 11:17 AM, Dominik Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> China wrote:
> > Ok, now it works, but when the PC_A returns
China wrote:
Ok, now it works, but when the PC_A returns up the resource doesn't remains
on PC_B and failback to PC_A.
How can I configure to switch the first time to PC_B on PC_A failover, but
not return back if PC_A returns UP?
Set resource stickiness to a reasonable value.
Here's roughly ho
Ok, now it works, but when the PC_A returns up the resource doesn't remains
on PC_B and failback to PC_A.
How can I configure to switch the first time to PC_B on PC_A failover, but
not return back if PC_A returns UP?
Thanks
On Dec 6, 2007 9:14 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On
On Dec 5, 2007, at 6:38 PM, China wrote:
Hi,
I've configured two machine with Linux-ha in Active/passive mode.
With v1
conf all is ok, instead with v2 conf there are the following
behaviours:
PC_A up with resource and PC_B up without resource
|
V
shu
Hi,
I've configured two machine with Linux-ha in Active/passive mode. With v1
conf all is ok, instead with v2 conf there are the following behaviours:
PC_A up with resource and PC_B up without resource
|
V
shutdown heartbeat
|
On another thread () I've been trying to figure out how
to get pingd to play nicely with hb_gui. One of the
difficulties of this task is understanding
what kind of information pingd provides. Judging from
the
examples on the pingd web page, the possible return
value
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 02:14:51PM -0800, Bill Eaton wrote:
>
>
> >> On another thread () I've been trying to figure out how
> to
> >> get pingd to play nicely with hb_gui. One of the
> >> difficulties of this task is understanding
> >> what kind of information pingd provides. Judging from t
> On November 30, 2007 7:36 AM, Eddie C edlinuxguru _at_
gmail.com
> I would also seriously advice staying away from the GUI.
You may hear
> that a lot. For a while I did not believe it myself.
Learning how to
> use the cib tools is the way to go. The GUI can really
only carry you
> so far in conf
I would also seriously advice staying away from the GUI. You may hear
that a lot. For a while I did not believe it myself. Learning how to
use the cib tools is the way to go. The GUI can really only carry you
so far in configuration.
On Nov 29, 2007 5:14 PM, Bill Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On another thread () I've been trying to figure out how
to
>> get pingd to play nicely with hb_gui. One of the
>> difficulties of this task is understanding
>> what kind of information pingd provides. Judging from the
>> examples on the pingd web page, the possible return
>> values are somethi
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:38:59AM -0800, Bill Eaton wrote:
> On another thread () I've been trying to figure out how to get pingd to play
> nicely with hb_gui. One of the difficulties of this task is understanding
> what kind of information pingd provides. Judging from the examples on the
> p
On another thread () I've been trying to figure out how to get pingd to play
nicely with hb_gui. One of the difficulties of this task is understanding
what kind of information pingd provides. Judging from the examples on the
pingd web page, the possible return values are something like
defined
> > I've been struggling for a couple of weeks to figure out
> > how to get my node to failover when I unplug the network
> > cable. I've read everything I can find
> > and I'm still struggling.
> >
> > I'm running
> > Heartbeat-2 2.1.2
> > Heartbeat-Gui(hb_gui) 2.1.2
> > Kubuntu
Hi
I've read the pingd doc (http://www.linux-ha.org/pingd) more than 10
times now and I can't figure out how to set up a simple working pingd
config.
What I'm trying to do is ping a group of IPs and then use that as a
constraint to transfer control to another cluster if none of the ping
nodes can
On Nov 21, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Bill Eaton wrote:
I've been struggling for a couple of weeks to figure out how to get
my node
to failover when I unplug the network cable. I've read everything I
can find
and I'm still struggling.
I'm running
Heartbeat-2 2.1.2
Heartbeat-Gui(hb_gui
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
