Hi Dejan,
Thank you for comments.
> That's not a good reason. Testing if binaries exist on every
> monitor operation really doesn't make much sense. Why would you
> expect programs to start disappearing? And if they do, we may
> have a much more serious problem to deal with.
All right.
We withd
Hi Hideo-san,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:43:00PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> Thank you for comments.
>
>
> > Hi Hideo-san,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:18:07AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> > > Hi Dejan,
> > >
> > > Thank you for comments.
> > >
Hi Dejan,
Thank you for comments.
> Hi Hideo-san,
>
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:18:07AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > Thank you for comments.
> >
> > > > I change validate-all and want to change it to always carry out
> > > > validate-all.
> > > > I abolish
Hi Hideo-san,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:18:07AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> Thank you for comments.
>
> > > I change validate-all and want to change it to always carry out
> > > validate-all.
> > > I abolish vgck/vgdisplay carried out in validate-all and intend to
Hi Dejan,
I send the patch which I thought about just to make sure.
Change 1) Changed validate-all to the parameter checks. And always call it.
Change 2) Chose vgck/vgdisplay by start processing and carried it out.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Mon, 2012/4/9, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
Hi Dejan,
Thank you for comments.
> > I change validate-all and want to change it to always carry out
> > validate-all.
> > I abolish vgck/vgdisplay carried out in validate-all and intend to make
> > only the check of the parameter simply.
> >
> > How do you think?
>
> Isn't it that validate-
Hi Hideo-san,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:50:39AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> I change validate-all and want to change it to always carry out validate-all.
> I abolish vgck/vgdisplay carried out in validate-all and intend to make only
> the check of the parameter simp
Hi Dejan,
I change validate-all and want to change it to always carry out validate-all.
I abolish vgck/vgdisplay carried out in validate-all and intend to make only
the check of the parameter simply.
How do you think?
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Fri, 2012/4/6, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote
Hi Hideo-san,
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:32:05AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> I agree to your patch.
Thank you for the reply.
BTW, the monitor was shamelessly stolen from Vladislav.
Applied.
ocft test passed (after some struggle and eventually fixing the
ocft sourc
Hi Dejan,
I agree to your patch.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Thu, 2012/4/5, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a proposed set of two patches which would eliminate use
> of LVM commands in the monitor path. We already discussed the
> issue elsewhere and I don't see any poi
Hi all,
This is a proposed set of two patches which would eliminate use
of LVM commands in the monitor path. We already discussed the
issue elsewhere and I don't see any point in keeping
vgck/vgdisplay given that they don't result in better monitoring
under normal circumstances. And if the circums
11 matches
Mail list logo
