te:
> Hello,
> I am new in this list, please can anyone inform me if there is any problem
> with the ipip tunneling in the above kernel ???(2.2.13). This kernel included
> in the SuSe 6.3 distribution. I can setup the interface tunl0 but I can not
> route any network or even host v
On Sun, 20 Jul 2036, John wrote about, ipip tunnel in kernel 2.2.13:
> Hello,
> I am new in this list, please can anyone inform me if there is any problem
> with the ipip tunneling in the above kernel ???(2.2.13). This kernel included
> in the SuSe 6.3 distribution. I can setup t
Hello,
I am new in this list, please can anyone inform me if there is any problem
with the ipip tunneling in the above kernel ???(2.2.13). This kernel included
in the SuSe 6.3 distribution. I can setup the interface tunl0 but I can not
route any network or even host via this interface (munge
on on the changes
> >to the IPIP encap / tunl0 routing with the new 2.2 kernel. I can't find
> >the information regarding the changes. The link I have to the search in
> >the Linux Hams archive is not working.
>
> Here is some mail from Hessu that explains the situatio
At 09:41 PM 03/28/2000 -0700, Matthew George wrote:
>I have been grocking all over trying to find information on the changes
>to the IPIP encap / tunl0 routing with the new 2.2 kernel. I can't find
>the information regarding the changes. The link I have to the search in
>the L
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 09:41:22PM -0700, Matthew George wrote:
> /sbin/route add -net 44.0.0.0 gw 128.54.16.18 netmask 255.0.0.0 dev
> tunl0
Get the iproute2 package and then do this instead:
ip route add 44.0.0.0/16 via 128.54.16.18 dev tunl0 onlink
The old route doesn't totally support all t
I have been grocking all over trying to find information on the changes
to the IPIP encap / tunl0 routing with the new 2.2 kernel. I can't find
the information regarding the changes. The link I have to the search in
the Linux Hams archive is not working.
I hate to bring up an issue t
Hi to all.
I'm a ham operator that operates in the region of Montreal. I
recently got involved in setting up a IPIP gateway for the region, a
collaboration between two clubs VE2CEV and VE2ETS
The platform of choice was RedHat 6.0 using kernel 2.2.xx. After
looking at the HOWTO
Does anyone know why we don't use redirection to a new gateway for ipip
encapsulation? It's simple, useful and I don't understand why we don't do it.
I've put together a couple of simple scripts to test my ideas and they work like
this
If an incoming ipip packet is
Folks,
I am having trouble with getting IPIP working on the gateway oanet.org.pe /
oanet.ampr.org.
I HAVE NOT put encap.txt on the machine (very limited h/d resources made this
seem undesirable) and instead route all 44. packets via mirrorshades
(128.54.16.18) . My understanding is that
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 08:24:33AM -0700, Bob Meyer wrote:
> Did I screw something up? It's perl script... that is the source code. It compiles
> at run time.
No, I did :) I didn't realise it was perl.
We'd better get it listed in the radio software data base ...
> Ya know, I'm just a dumb t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Might have been good of you to mention it. There is a sizable
> constituent of Linux gateway operators out there that didn't know about
> it.
>
I did mention it on nos-bbs and the old gateways list. At the time no one was
interested. My first dynamic gate was on
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
On 9 Aug, Bob Meyer wrote:
> Humm, I've had one of those for a while. ;-) I just finished playing with the
> new version that has install, uninstall scr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bob,
> Where is the source code?
>
Did I screw something up? It's perl script... that is the source code. It compiles
at run time.
Ya know, I'm just a dumb truck driver playing with this stuff.
Bob
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
On 9 Aug, Bob Meyer wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Humm, I've had one of those for a while. ;-) I just finished playing with the
> new version that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
> As a result of some discussion on the convers network about the plight
> of people wanting to operate IPIP encapsulating gateways, but having
> only a dynamic assigned IP network connection, and of hearing that the
> DOS based MFNOS had prov
Hello all,
As a result of some discussion on the convers network about the plight
of people wanting to operate IPIP encapsulating gateways, but having
only a dynamic assigned IP network connection, and of hearing that the
DOS based MFNOS had provided a solution to this problem, I've implem
.
> As a result of some discussion on the convers network about the
> plight of people wanting to operate IPIP encapsulating gateways,
> but having only a dynamic assigned IP network connection, and of
> hearing that the DOS based MFNOS had provided a solution to this
> problem, I&#x
At 07:51 PM 07/08/1999 +0300, Heikki Hannikainen wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Steve Meuse wrote:
>
>> Has anyone modified the munge script yet, or should I dust off my perl book?
>
> Here you go. It's on [http|ftp]://[http|ftp].hes.iki.fi/pub/oh7lzb/linux/
>too.
>
> - Hessu
Once again, thanks fo
This script is basically the 'munge' script written by Bdale N3EUA
# for the IPIP daemon and is modified by Ron Atkinson N8FOW. It's
# purpose is to convert a KA9Q NOS format gateways route file
# (usually called 'encap.txt') into a Linux routing table format
# f
At 11:18 AM 07/08/1999 +0300, Heikki Hannikainen wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Steve Meuse wrote:
>
>> Has anyone been able to sucessfully get IPIP encapsulation to work on a
>> 2.2.x kernel?
>
> Yup. It's different than before. You need the new /sbin/ip tool to
>
--- Steve Meuse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has anyone been able to sucessfully get IPIP encapsulation to work on
> a
> 2.2.x kernel?
Yes, but it's a little tricky.
Here's an example (the gateway address is 128.123.7.33, the amprnet is
44.30.2.0 with a netmas
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 12:37:07AM -0400, Steve Meuse wrote:
> Has anyone been able to sucessfully get IPIP encapsulation to work on a
> 2.2.x kernel?
Yes. I send question to ANK ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) about how to create
tunnel under 2.1 kernel. Him recomend me make the next:
Or ma
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Steve Meuse wrote:
> Has anyone been able to sucessfully get IPIP encapsulation to work on a
> 2.2.x kernel?
Yup. It's different than before. You need the new /sbin/ip tool to
configure tunnels. It is needed for a lot of other things too, like policy
rou
Has anyone been able to sucessfully get IPIP encapsulation to work on a
2.2.x kernel?
Whenever I try to add an encap route (for lack of a better term) I get the
following:
# uname -a
Linux davros 2.2.9 #5 Sun Jul 4 23:18:48 EDT 1999 i686 unknown
# route add -net 44.104.0.0 gw 146.115.236.252
Greetings Jose
I got as far as your saying that you were using JNOS and stopped.
I have to stop at that point as I have no knowledge of *NOS (TNOS,JNOS,...)
as I have never used them. My apologies but I am unable to help you where
*NOS is involved.
I hope some of the *NOS aware on this list are
--
> From: Richard Stearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dynamic addr for a axip or ipip tunnel?
> Date: Thursday, June 10, 1999 7:51 PM
>
> >
> > I am sure that I am not the only guy who dials into an ISP and receives
All you have to do is run the remote
script after doing the dialup.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Doing IPIP with a dy
f, is there a better
> mouse trap? I tried the tunnel-munge script but could not get it to
> work.
>
> The system here runs diald (dial on demand) which auto creates the ppp0
> circuit and default gw. I would like to link the internal nos network
> to other gateways via axip or e
Hi John.
> I am sure that I am not the only guy who dials into an ISP and
> receives an dynamic IP address for the outside interface with
> ipfwadm and running Amateur tcpip applications. Aside from hand
> editing source and destination address's each time the system
> kicks off, is there a
a better
> > > mouse trap? I tried the tunnel-munge script but could not get it to
> > > work.
> > >
> > > The system here runs diald (dial on demand) which auto creates the ppp0
> > > circuit and default gw. I would like to link the internal nos networ
k the internal nos network
> > to other gateways via axip or even ipip using the ISP dynamic address
> > (which changes with each login).
> >
> > Is there anyone doing this? Thank you in advance.
You might want to try the dynamic dns service at
http://www.justlinux.com/dynami
tem kicks off, is there a better
> mouse trap? I tried the tunnel-munge script but could not get it to
> work.
>
> The system here runs diald (dial on demand) which auto creates the ppp0
> circuit and default gw. I would like to link the internal nos network
> to other gateways
a better
> mouse trap? I tried the tunnel-munge script but could not get it to
> work.
>
> The system here runs diald (dial on demand) which auto creates the ppp0
> circuit and default gw. I would like to link the internal nos network
> to other gateways via axip or even ipip usi
at: -117.00980 Grid: DM12LU
=
>--
>From: John Feist[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 1999 10:00 AM
>To:LINUX-HAMS
>Subject: Dynamic addr for a axip or ipip tunnel?
>
>I am sure that I am no
p? I tried the tunnel-munge script but could not get it to
work.
The system here runs diald (dial on demand) which auto creates the ppp0
circuit and default gw. I would like to link the internal nos network
to other gateways via axip or even ipip using the ISP dynamic address
(which changes with
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Matthew Briggs wrote:
> What do you need to do to set up the routing for IPIP?
>
> - How do I register our AMPR region as reachable via our particular internet IP
> address and IPIP, so that other gateways will route to it.
>
> - How do I subscribe
ime now, we still have no 44 contact with the rest of
> the world due to no IPIP.
>
> Since we have just converted to Linux on the gateway machine I will ask again:
>
>
> What do you need to do to set up the routing for IPIP?
>
> I want to know:
>
> - How do
Hello,
I know this is more 'ham' and less 'linux' ... but here goes the question
anyway:
We are trying to set up a gateway in Lima, Peru, and although the gateway has
been operational for some time now, we still have no 44 contact with the rest of
the world due to no IPIP.
is a dynamic connection to the internet although
I am being hosted by a friend this encapsulation
I do it with the JNOS since another PC in the local network,
the PC that has the setting of the IPIP / IP_MASQUERADE
is the one that is connected to the internet via my ISP.
My friend Jim sent
On Sun, 20 Dec 1998, Ve7ihl (Lane) wrote:
> Also, should I be using NetTools v1.33 (as in the ax25 HOWTO), or stay
> with the NetTools that comes with Slackware 3.5. This seems to be
> net-tools v1.432.
Unless you are using ROSE, just forget the net-tools. You will probably
get slightly corrupte
; jnos/dos, and Tnos/Linux in the past.
>
> This time I want to use 'pure' Linux, and no Tnos/Jnos at all.
>
> I understand the using the IPIP tunnel driver, and the axip daemon is
> the way to go.
> Can someone tell me if this is the best way to go, and what is the most
On Sun, 20 Dec 1998, Curtis D. Levin wrote:
> I use this daemon to route my fpac node stuff. It doesn't seem to want to
> use anything but the default route. I have tried it with another gateway
> with no luck. I route everything thru one gateway only now. I tried the
> process.c patch, and it di
On Mon, 21 Dec 1998, Arturo wrote:
#
#daemon for axip is ax25ipd v.1.0.2 from ax25-utils-2.1.42a with some
#modifications: work routing for callsign with or without SSID: routes
#with flag b (broadcast) works also if i use a route with flag d (default);
#don't accept data from an ip if it is not
On Sun, 20 Dec 1998, Ve7ihl (Lane) wrote:
> I understand the using the IPIP tunnel driver, and the axip daemon is
> the way to go. Can someone tell me if this is the best way to go, and
> what is the most current versions.
I use an old kernel (2.1.29) and external daemon for encap
Hello,
I am currently in the beginnings of setting up a new gateway for the
Vancouver, BC, Canada area. I have previously set up gateways here using
jnos/dos, and Tnos/Linux in the past.
This time I want to use 'pure' Linux, and no Tnos/Jnos at all.
I understand the using the I
46 matches
Mail list logo
