On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 11:43:06AM +0100, Gerd wrote:
I'm a Debian developer, I'm not running slink.
So there are plans to use 2.2.x kernels on Debian, too?
You can run 2.2 on Debian 2.1 (slink). It works just fine, out of the
box; almost all of the tools support 2.2 and 2.0 (deliberately).
Hello Terry,
I'm a Debian developer, I'm not running slink.
So there are plans to use 2.2.x kernels on Debian, too?
Just curious,
Gerd
--
Gerd Roethig
Universität Leipzig, Medizinische Klinik u. PK I
Johannisallee 32, 04103 Leipzig
Tel. (0341) 97 12622, Fax (0341) 97 12515
I am still in state of confusion, as it has not worked WELL so far under
Linux. Please let me insist on clearing this old doubt of mine, if gurus
can help.
Using RedHat 5.2 and kernel 2.0.36 on a DX2/66, how can I make a MS400
card, with AA4RE mods to share a single IRQ for the four ports
Gerd wrote:
I'm a Debian developer, I'm not running slink.
So there are plans to use 2.2.x kernels on Debian, too?
Of course.
Terry
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Ing. Jose A. Amador wrote:
I am still in state of confusion, as it has not worked WELL so far under
Linux. Please let me insist on clearing this old doubt of mine, if gurus
can help.
Using RedHat 5.2 and kernel 2.0.36 on a DX2/66, how can I make a MS400
card, with
On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 08:04:16PM +0100, Thomas Pinz wrote:
connect: No route to host
Here I have no idea how this can be fixed, too.
there are some changes in the routing behavior... if you add a "axparms -route
add if call", it
works... but here the problem appears only with "call",
Hi,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I get "socket: invalid argument" when trying to use call or axparms as above.
However I'm not 100% sure my recompile of ax25-* actually uses the new code.
I did recompile everything but I think /usr/include/netax25/ax25.h is
still the original. On Debian that file
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 06:28:47PM +0100, Gerd wrote:
Pentium class computer, preferrably 300 MHz and above
64 MB RAM or more (the more, the better)
These are wildly exaggerated requirements for Linux.
But in a lot of publications and also in a lot of user statements in the
On 21 Jan, Gerd wrote:
And that is the main question: Is there still an effect, a benefit from all
these improvements even if the newest kernel is run on the 386 DX 40
mentioned above? Or, in other words, can it be recommended to upgrade even
such old machines to the current kernel?
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 02:02:15PM -0400, M Taylor wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Terry Dawson wrote:
And is there also a performance improvement visible? Even if someone could
assure me that these kernels do not slow down older hardware I would be glad.
Then, I could even use a
On 20 Jan, Gerd wrote:
But in a lot of publications and also in a lot of user statements in the
Usenet, repeatedly, such requirements were announced.
You're not cynical enough about mainstream press.
Those sorts of configurations might be recommended by distributions for
"typical" user
On 19 Jan, Gerd wrote:
Pentium class computer, preferrably 300 MHz and above
64 MB RAM or more (the more, the better)
These are wildly exaggerated requirements for Linux.
So, I even was a little bit afraid if Slackware 7, which comes with 2.2.13,
would run on my K6-2/400 with 64 MB RAM -
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Gerd wrote about, Re: New AX.25 and newest kernel 2.2.14:
first test results:
The information comes from several german computer magazines stating that you
need at least 64 MB physical RAM in order to get a benefit of the new
kernel's memory management features
Hello Terry, hello all,
The new kernels do not slow down older hardware, be reassured.
That's great. :)
But, a 386 DX 40 with 8 MB should rather stick to 2.0.38, shouldn't it?
Only if you don't want the benefit of all of the improvements that have
been introduced into the kernel since
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Gerd wrote about, Re: New AX.25 and newest kernel 2.2.14: first
test results:
Hello Ray, hello all,
The information comes from several german computer magazines stating that you
need at least 64 MB physical RAM in order to get a benefit of the new
kernel's memory
Hello Jens,
So, what about lower rates like 1200, 2400, 2660, 4800 bps, AFSK, HAPN and
the like? Aren't they supported any more? Or, do I have to set some filter
for them, too?
Tom´s original modulators and demodulators are - of cause - still included. In
fact you can select between
Hello Thomas, hello all,
But when initialising the card with sethdlc you must set two filter
curves, one for rx, one for tx.
Filter curves? How can these be set?
the new sethdlc-command is:
sethdlc -i sm0 -p mode sbc:fsk9600_4.fsk9600_4_32
the first fsk... is for rx, the second for
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 08:47:33AM +0100, Gerd wrote:
I use the new stuff on a 486/66, 16mb ram, disless boot via nfs an suse 6.2.
Kernel 2.2.14 with 16 MB RAM? Does that really work? Then one can guess that
Certainly, my 2.2.12 packet box is a 486/100 with 16mb, also diskless
(ie: no
Hello Hamish, hello all,
I use the new stuff on a 486/66, 16mb ram, disless boot via nfs an suse
6.2.
Kernel 2.2.14 with 16 MB RAM? Does that really work? Then one can guess that
Certainly, my 2.2.12 packet box is a 486/100 with 16mb, also diskless
(ie: no swap!)
Sounds a
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Gerd wrote:
So, I even was a little bit afraid if Slackware 7, which comes with 2.2.13,
would run on my K6-2/400 with 64 MB RAM - but it does (I am still estonished).
I was running Slackware (4.0) on 386/33MHz/8MB RAM/100MB HDD
(with swap :) ) .. not very fast setup
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Gerd wrote:
Pentium class computer, preferrably 300 MHz and above
64 MB RAM or more (the more, the better)
So, I even was a little bit afraid if Slackware 7, which comes with 2.2.13,
would run on my K6-2/400 with 64 MB RAM - but it does (I am still estonished).
This
Hi Gerd,
On Wed 2000-01-19 (09:29), Gerd wrote:
Hello Hamish, hello all,
I use the new stuff on a 486/66, 16mb ram, disless boot via nfs an suse
6.2.
Kernel 2.2.14 with 16 MB RAM? Does that really work? Then one can guess that
Certainly, my 2.2.12 packet box is a
Hi Gerd,
So, what about lower rates like 1200, 2400, 2660, 4800 bps, AFSK, HAPN and
the like? Aren't they supported any more? Or, do I have to set some filter
for them, too?
Tom´s original modulators and demodulators are - of cause - still included.
In fact you can select between the
Hi,
Gerd wrote:
But setting an option for either serial or parallel or MIDI connected PTT
circuit failed. It seems that sethdlc is broken, too.
I suspect that you still had the parport and serial device drivers
loaded
or some hardware problem. If not please investigate and send
Jan Wasserbauer wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Gerd wrote:
So, I even was a little bit afraid if Slackware 7, which comes with 2.2.13,
would run on my K6-2/400 with 64 MB RAM - but it does (I am still estonished).
I was running Slackware (4.0) on 386/33MHz/8MB RAM/100MB HDD
(with swap
Hello Ray, hello all,
I use the new stuff on a 486/66, 16mb ram, disless boot via nfs an
suse 6.2.
Kernel 2.2.14 with 16 MB RAM? Does that really work? Then one can guess
that
Certainly, my 2.2.12 packet box is a 486/100 with 16mb, also diskless (ie:
no swap!)
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello to the list,
Compiling the new kernel we found that the drivers for
6pack
yam
bpqether
cause the kernel compile to fail
By intention. This way they will get fixed *apropriately*.
I could also fix them, but I´d need the hardware to test it or
Servus Gerd
I use the new stuff on a 486/66, 16mb ram, disless boot via nfs an suse 6.2.
Kernel 2.2.14 with 16 MB RAM? Does that really work? Then one can guess that
it is even possible to run 2.2.14 on a box like my booksized one: Cyrix Media
GX 133, 32 MB RAM, 10 GB Harddrive.
Well,
Hello to the list,
some days ago, there was announcement that the new DG2FEF AX.25-Stack is also
available for Linux kernel 2.2.14.
Since the pages at
http://www.afthd.tu-darmstadt.de/~dg1kjd/linux-ax25/index.html
claim that the DG2FEF AX.25 stack is already more reliable and more
Hi Gerd (and the rest of the world :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are the results.
We tested that new software on two different computers, one using SuSE Linux
6.3 (K6-300, 32 MB RAM, 1 GB harddrive) the other one using Caldera OpenLinux
2.3. (Celeron 400, 64 MB RAM, 20 GB harddrive).
I
30 matches
Mail list logo
