"Laporte, Justin" wrote:
> I have an ATI IIc 3d rage pro video card mach64 with internal Ramdac. I have
> tried all the mach 64 and ATI servers. Does anyone know of an X sever that
> will run on this card properly other than SVGA? Also I have always tried to
> probe clock during setup and it hang
Guy Cohen wrote:
>
> At this (Sat, May 15, 1999 at 05:04:14AM +0200) day, Barid Bel Medar wrote:
> | I got linux redhat 6.0, running on celeron 266, 64MB ram, linux native partition
>1.5 GB and linux swap partition 850Mb
>
> in a nice configuration of 128MB virtual memory, you can use a maga
> On Sat, 15 May 1999, Ishai Parasol wrote:
>
> > I heard that 2.3.0 is out so you should probably use this one.
> not to mention the fact that 2.3.0 is just a 2.2.(i dont remember what
> number) kernel with a new revision number, I'd like to mention something
> which should have been common kno
On 15-May-99 Guy Cohen wrote:
> btw, if i'm not mistaken about it (it's been a while) linux
> cant
> acualy use more then 128 space on one swap partition.
The restriction was removed in 2.2
Regards,
Evgeny
/ Evgeny Stambulch
At this (Sat, May 15, 1999 at 05:04:14AM +0200) day, Barid Bel Medar wrote:
| I got linux redhat 6.0, running on celeron 266, 64MB ram, linux native partition 1.5
|GB and linux swap partition 850Mb
Woho, hold that horsie. your using much to much space for the swap partition.
fetch a copy of Inst
> if I were gonna make a concious buy today, and wanted the latest in video
> power, I would buy one of the ATI Rage-128GL cards (Magnum I think one of
> them is called, I don't remember the other one's name). thet sport 32MB of
> RAM, OpenGL in hardware, performance just above and un-over-clocked
I got linux redhat 6.0, running on celeron 266,
64MB ram, linux native partition 1.5 GB and linux swap partition
850Mb
I got two other parition, 550 Mb each that are on
fat 32
In linux, I can't see those two Hd, I'm aware that
linux threat partitions and drives like directories, but I search
Hi.
I want to run a caching only name server on my
local network. Obviously, the name server needs to connect to the root
nameservers.
However, the connection is made from UDP port 53 to
UDP port 53, and the answer returns on UDP port 53 (unlike regular DNS query
which returns to an unpriv
do you think that that comfort, which can mostly (if not totally)
maintained, is worth the price of being used for spam relaying ? (not to
mention the cost and hassle for the server administrators themselves).
Also, most of the GUI clients (l)users use, check for mail on startup, so
most of those
OS>> Your network --- Your problem, but having your smtp server accessible from
OS>> the net, and having it relaying for everyone is something which cannot be
OS>> justified - In my humble opinion, at least. (Well, I also took that
OS>> opinion from Paul Vixie, so it's not so humble)
There are c
> what's RBL ?
MAPS RBL, Mail Abuse Prevention System - Realtime Blackhole List.
It's a system from creating intentional network outages for the purpose of
limiting spam mail. Basically, they keep a DB of systems which are known
to be spammers-friendly, keep an open relay, etc ..
There are rul
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Ishai Parasol wrote:
> I heard that 2.3.0 is out so you should probably use this one.
not to mention the fact that 2.3.0 is just a 2.2.(i dont remember what
number) kernel with a new revision number, I'd like to mention something
which should have been common knowledge, but
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Or Sagi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the "Right" way to allow such open relay is use some sort of
> authentication (That's what POP before SMTP is for), rather then keep an
> open relay. Having an open relay around will get you RBLed in no time ...
what's RBL ?
well- I want to have
"Laporte, Justin" wrote:
>
> I have an ATI IIc 3d rage pro video card mach64 with internal Ramdac. I have
> tried all the mach 64 and ATI servers. Does anyone know of an X sever that
> will run on this card properly other than SVGA? Also I have always tried to
> probe clock during setup and it ha
On Thu, 13 May 1999, - wrote:
> Hello.
> I need a SIMPLE and GOOD turitial about network developing with c for linux.
> Any ideas where can i get/download one ?
try this one (ok. so it's mine.):
http://www.actcm.co.il/~choo/lupg/tutorials/
and then choose the 'Internetworking With Unix Socket
On Fri, 14 May 1999, Meir Litmanovich wrote:
> My suggest is to rebuild .cf from scratch with your
> favorit options enabled . For sure, you do not need
> to write it yourself - just use m4 .
I know I don't need to edit sendmail.cf . I meant to say that I used the
file redhat.mc that came wit
192.168.0.0 worked for me.
It seems that the dhcp daemon allows configuration for the interface
itself,
if you define it as a subnet (I don't know why someone would want to use
it,
but buy I can argue with that)
Thank you Vadim.
Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth Isaac Aaron on Thu, May 13, 1999:
> >
17 matches
Mail list logo
