Re: Force reboot a machine?

2003-06-04 Thread Shaul Karl
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 02:23:16PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: About serial consol - anyone has a RJ-45 to D9 serial cable? I don't have one. You can probably do without it. There are adapters that have an RJ45 female on one end and any conventional

Re: Force reboot a machine?

2003-06-04 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Shaul Karl wrote: As to your original problem, aren't those problems might point an intruder? Well, of course. An intruder MAY have generated those symptoms. It's highly unlikely, however. Logs are not full, TCP communication is at normal level. syslog has warnings about SCSI errors. All

Re: Force reboot a machine?

2003-06-04 Thread linux_il
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:26:14PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 02:23:16PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: About serial consol - anyone has a RJ-45 to D9 serial cable? And where would you connect that RJ45? This part of the

Re: Force reboot a machine?

2003-06-04 Thread Shachar Shemesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And where would you connect that RJ45? This part of the discussion reminds me that back about 7 years ago when I took part in some tiny ISP there was some hub laying around there which could take serial cables and make them available over telnet, (each serial port mapped

Re: Force reboot a machine?

2003-06-04 Thread Idan Sofer
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 02:23:16PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: On a side note, what's 2.4.18-8? I thought debian went with vanilla always? Debian's kernel source packages are not plain vanilla, the maintainers add couple of patches, mostly removal of non-free stuff(driver that contain

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Dittigas
Having been contributing to whatsup (www.whatsup.org.il) for a while now, I think it has clearly become the de-facto leader of news and support alternative to Israeli FOSS users. For the last 1.5 years I have seen it grow from a meer few dozens registered users, to full blown 800+ with over 1M

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Dittigas wrote: Having been contributing to whatsup (www.whatsup.org.il) for a while now, I think it has clearly become the de-facto leader of news and support alternative to Israeli FOSS users. For the last 1.5 years I have seen it grow from a meer few dozens registered users, to full blown

Re: [OT] BEOS IS ALIVE!!!!1!

2003-06-04 Thread Oron Peled
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 13:58:43 +0300 Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - 2.5 adds system calls for manipulating a task's processor affinity: sched_getaffinity() and sched_setaffinity() I haven't checked if RH 9.0 includes a backport of it to their 2.4 kernel. (It's pretty trivial to

Re: [OT] BEOS IS ALIVE!!!!1!

2003-06-04 Thread Oron Peled
On 03 Jun 2003 11:12:43 +0300 Gilboa Davara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: B. Events (posix conditions). Wait it doesn't work right (PulseEvent never did... MS, like MS, just refuses to fix it), NT events are much easier to use, and have much better control. The posix conditions are a just pain in

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Meir Kriheli
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 17:38, Shachar Shemesh wrote: Dittigas wrote: Having been contributing to whatsup (www.whatsup.org.il) for a while now, I think it has clearly become the de-facto leader of news and support alternative to Israeli FOSS users. For the last 1.5 years I have seen it

Re: Linux distro for old computers

2003-06-04 Thread Diego Iastrubni
I know people running in some 266 pc's, kde cvs. They are using gentoo, but it is optimized as any redhat/mdk for that arch. OO will be out of the question, but I can be wrong... However more ram is a good idea (and cheap, you can get 128mb for about 50nis I would guess). , 3 2003, 14:08,

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:52:25PM +0300, Meir Kriheli wrote: [ snip ] There's one thing we must realize: The stage of early adapters and techies adopting FOSS is reaching the end. From now on we are facing a uphill PR battle. We're nearing a stage off public non techie adoption. As we

Re: Linux distro for old computers

2003-06-04 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
This is silly. I use gnome-latest in debian unstable on a PII266 with 64MB of memory, and it works fine. It doesn't fly, but it works. Yeah, I run KDE CVS on such a low end machine too (after compiling it with prelinking, disable-debug, enable-final where it's possible) - and that could

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Meir Kriheli
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 20:49, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:52:25PM +0300, Meir Kriheli wrote: [ snip ] There's one thing we must realize: The stage of early adapters and techies adopting FOSS is reaching the end. From now on we are facing a uphill PR battle.

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:16:59PM +0300, Meir Kriheli wrote: On Tuesday 03 June 2003 20:49, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: To what address should announcements be sent? Are there any problems with UTF-8 text? All *Nuke systems have a simply way to submit stories via the web interface. Knowing

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Meir Kriheli wrote: Wouldn't it save resources if a Press Release was issued ? It have saved us the time to translate it, and Nadav's time coming and fixing it. To what address should announcements be sent? Are there any problems with UTF-8 text? All *Nuke systems have a simply way to

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Meir Kriheli
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 21:36, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:16:59PM +0300, Meir Kriheli wrote: On Tuesday 03 June 2003 20:49, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: To what address should announcements be sent? Are there any problems with UTF-8 text? All *Nuke systems have a simply

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Meir Kriheli
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 22:59, Shachar Shemesh wrote: As for you, Meir. I wrote a long email, only to realize I'm too angry and hurt to click send without regretting it later on. Read my previous post, show some interest in actively helpin, send your comments to me or the board in private, ask

Solved - Temporary malfunctioning of email on linux.org.il

2003-06-04 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
For an hour or two, linux.org.il might've refused emails send to it, including emails sent to linux-il. This, of course, is just a forwarder address and the list was always accessible via the address at cs.huji.ac.il. I apologize for the inconvenience caused by those problems caused by my

Modern SCO Executive

2003-06-04 Thread Ira Abramov
on a lighter note, this filk is by two members of the SVlug: http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/PiratesOfPenguinance (Apologies to Gilbert, Sullivan, and most of humanity) -- Next step in human evolution Ira Abramov http://ira.abramov.org/email/

SCO vs IBM on yesterday's HaAretz

2003-06-04 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
If you would like to read about it from a Microsoft- and Bush- bashing article, take a look at (reg. req.) http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArtSR.jhtml?itemNo=299720objNo=10045returnParam=Y -- Dan Kenigsberghttp://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~dankenICQ 162180901

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote about Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever): Creating awarness with those journalists take time. We sent one press release about Haifux already. I missed the HSpell announcement. Since Hspell became a favorite example here, I think I better comment on it.

Re: SCO vs IBM on yesterday's HaAretz

2003-06-04 Thread Hetz Ben-Hamo
Try this: http://news.walla.co.il/?w=/4/395478/@@/item/printer No registration required ;) Hetz -- Original Message --- From: Dan Kenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: iglu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:20:23 +0300 Subject: SCO vs IBM on yesterday's HaAretz