Re: Thunderbird doesn't find new messages via IMAP-SSL

2004-04-04 Thread Shachar Shemesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know what else can I do to solve this? Thanks, At least in Mozilla, there is a problem that may be related. The problem is that mozilla doesn't handle Courier's limitation on number of simultanious connections properly. Try going to Edit/MailNewsgroup

DHCP problem

2004-04-04 Thread Tom Rosenfeld
Hi guys! I am having a DHCP problem. I have a dozen RedHat 9 workstations that are booting via a fixed address DHCP server. The dhcpd.conf file has an entry like the following for each host: host bob { option host-name bob.fh.huji.ac.il; hardware ethernet 00:0d:9d:d9:25:00;

Re: DHCP problem

2004-04-04 Thread Gil Freund
I recall a similar problem: 1 RH workstation 12 Debian Workstation If the net went down the redhat (7.2) lost it's ip and never recovered it. The problem seemed to be in pump (the dhcp client) in RH. While the debians ISC dhcp-clients kept trying to find the DHCP server, pump gave up until it

Re: Sharing my problem solving experience.

2004-04-04 Thread Simone
On an ugly morning I received the following message when booting my NIS server: mounting proc filesystem [ ERROR ] dup2: bad file descriptor On an uglySUNDAY! evening I received the same message from my samba 3 server. :-( After a while of googling I found the following solution which

Re: Which RH or FC to install for company developer desktop?

2004-04-04 Thread Ariel Biener
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, guy keren wrote: We already have CD's of RH 8 and RH9 at the office. We expect to see both of them at customer sites. from stability point of view, you should install RH 9.0 - but it's a dead goat because of redhat's recent moves. i got my PC installed with fedora

Re: Which RH or FC to install for company developer desktop?

2004-04-04 Thread Ariel Biener
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, guy keren wrote: Hi, Sorry for the missfire earlier (pine ...). since the machine has a pentium 4 with hyper-threading, i installed an SMP kernel and it now runs with '2 CPUs' - does windows XP does this out ofthe box, by the way? (i don't know since i didn't