Hello, list.
Can anybody help me with this issue?
I need to install gcc3.2.2 on my Mandriva 2005, whithout removing the existing
gcc3.4 . So I do
[builddir]$ sorcedir/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc322 --program-suffix-3.2.2
[builddir]$ make
[builddir]$ sudo make install
Everything works
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 12:02:38PM +0300, Boris Gorelik wrote:
Hello, list.
Can anybody help me with this issue?
I need to install gcc3.2.2 on my Mandriva 2005, whithout removing the
existing
gcc3.4 . So I do
[builddir]$ sorcedir/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc322 --program-suffix-3.2.2
No
On Thu May 26 2005 12:29, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
Removing /opt/gcc322 from where? From PATH or from LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
removing as in rm -fr (or mv gcc322 /tmp/gcc322.backup)
Generally, I do not think it's recommended to run programs with shared
libs that are compiled with different
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:55:50PM +0300, Boris Gorelik wrote:
On Thu May 26 2005 12:29, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
Removing /opt/gcc322 from where? From PATH or from LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
removing as in rm -fr (or mv gcc322 /tmp/gcc322.backup)
OK. You did not state exactly what you did, so
Replying to myself, I should note that thanks to the generousity (timewise and
money-wise) of Arik Baratz, the homepage's official URL is now:
http://www.python.org.il/
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
On Sunday 22 May 2005 22:46, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Check:
http://python.hackers.org.il/
For
On Thu May 26 2005 14:44, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
You compiled stuff, using shared libs from this new gcc. You somehow
made the execs find those libs (e.g. LD_LIBRARY_PATH or -rpath).
Then you deleted it, and they can't find the shared libs.
Sorry. This is some more info: There is only one
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 03:43:17PM +0300, Boris Gorelik wrote:
On Thu May 26 2005 14:44, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
You compiled stuff, using shared libs from this new gcc. You somehow
made the execs find those libs (e.g. LD_LIBRARY_PATH or -rpath).
Then you deleted it, and they can't find
On Thu May 26 2005 16:42, you wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 03:43:17PM +0300, Boris Gorelik wrote:
Not enough.
You have a standard install of mandriva.
In addition, you compiled gcc322 with --prefix=pref1.
Correct.
Up until now, nothing should have changed. Standard binaries continue
to
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Boris Gorelik wrote:
I know that this sounds strange and funny, so I'll stress it again: installing
gcc322 in completely isolated directory (/opt/gcc322) breaks lots of already
existing standrd applications. Removing /opt/gcc322 (rm -fr /opt/gcc322)
completely restores
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:07:30PM +0300, Boris Gorelik wrote:
On Thu May 26 2005 16:42, you wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 03:43:17PM +0300, Boris Gorelik wrote:
Not enough.
You have a standard install of mandriva.
In addition, you compiled gcc322 with --prefix=pref1.
Correct.
Up
Hi,
I an in the process of setting a Linux based Terminal Server which is
suppose to coexist with an exiting windows environment.
To easy the transition for users we already have Firefox, Thunderbird
and OO in the Windows environment. I would like to preserve the
setting from applications and
Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Alexander Indenbaum wrote:
On 5/25/05, Alex Rier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Breakthrough Ltd provides Software Development and System
Administration
Services. For more information see www.breakt.co.il
FYI
This is *THE WORST* company I
just because that's how *you* think things need to be, then you
are not too different than the people who block our roads in
the morning protesting; nor the even more extreme kinds.
i agree. shlomi's actually trying to change something that's wrong with our
legal/political system (like the
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 14:45, Imri Zvik wrote:
When people start choosing what laws to obey and what not, it is the
fastest way to chaos.
The only valid laws are the prevention of initiatory force, threat of force,
or fraud against one's self or property (not the so-called intellectual
Comparing attempts to prevent a genocide with breaking the copyrights
law is an insult to whomever been in the holocaust. You cannot dismiss
any laws you do not agree with, it just doesn't work this way - YOU
should get a reality check (and a shrink or a probation officer, ASAP.).
It's not that
Shlomi,
It's not a matter of if in your ideal imaginary world such thing should
be legal, and one person who bought a copy of a
book/cd/dvd/software/whatever could redistribute it (with, or without
payment) to the whole wide world.
In the real world, redistributing copyrighted materiel without
When people start choosing what laws to obey and what not, it is the
fastest way to chaos. The fact is that you still break the laws of the
sovereign, democratic entity you're part of, and that would make you an
outlaw, a criminal.
And about the economic system - didn't you ever hear about the
GSM Yes. Your house of cards is built on the concept that copyrighted
GSM material is not intelectual property. In most countries it is. The
IP is a very peculiar concept - it's a property for the thing that is not
scarce. You have regular property right on, say, your car because cars are
scarce
At least know your idols.
And I quote Open source is a development methodology; free software is a
social movement.
The FSF is specifically asking people not to mix both terms on their website.
I am overwhelmed with your contributes to the public. Your freecell solver is a
state-of-the-art,
GSM It's taking of something that you don't have permission to. If that
GSM is not stealing, what is?
I hereby deny you permission to breath the air. You are still breathing.
Are you stealing, are you a thief?
GSM Note that without copyright laws the GPL would not exist. It would be
UB That's the everybody's doing it argument. There's a whole of a lot
UB of immoral and illegal stuff you can justify with that.
Actually, I have hard time thinking about anything illegal and immoral
that a lot of people are doing and even more people see nothing bad in
doing even if they don't
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:55:45PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
A business owner is a business owner. An employee is an employee. I will
not hire anyone but a Linux enthusiastic, because anyone else is not
very useful to me. Still, I believe that people I employ should be
payed, fairly. I
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
UB That's the everybody's doing it argument. There's a whole of a lot
UB of immoral and illegal stuff you can justify with that.
Actually, I have hard time thinking about anything illegal and immoral
that a lot of people are doing and even more people see nothing bad
EE Many people are also avoiding taxes or not follow traffic rules. Do
EE you think we need to change our laws to fit what is comfortable to
EE most people?
Actually, what can be the nobler purpose for the law if not making life
more comfortable to the most people? ;)
EE is chosen by the
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:18:57PM +0300, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Since the whole copyright discussion is over by popular demand, I won't
answer that.
Actually, I don't see absolute value in GPL existance. With all due
respect to RMS, his crusade against commercial software vendors doesn't
IZ Domino Effect? Music for example pays salaries of numerous of people,
IZ allowing them to be able to buy other products and services, and by that
IZ help other people receive a paycheck. Producing and trading copyrighted
If music industry ceased to exist, these people without any doubt would
IZ You seem to forget that the music industry is only one of the MANY
IZ industries who rely on the copyrights laws. All these industries
IZ provide work and job places for many other industries and etc. etc.
IZ etc.
I do not forget this - I just considered it obvious that everything
applying to
UB There are a lot of people who believe, as I do, that disrespecting IP is
UB immoral. So your presentation of it is misleading, and your question is
UB better unasked.
OK, they do believe so, so what? My point is entirely different - that
there are not many things that everybody does it but
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
UB There are a lot of people who believe, as I do, that disrespecting IP is
UB immoral. So your presentation of it is misleading, and your question is
UB better unasked.
OK, they do believe so, so what?
Your own argument was based on may more people see nothing
Hi,
I decided that it's time to update my kernel. Since I like working hard, I
usually compile my own kernels. What I usually do is use the
scripts/patch-kernel command found in linux2.4 (at least...)
Now, recently Linus decided to move into a 4 numbers versions, and it seems I
am having
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:43:41AM +0300, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Hi,
I decided that it's time to update my kernel. Since I like working hard, I
usually compile my own kernels. What I usually do is use the
scripts/patch-kernel command found in linux2.4 (at least...)
Now, recently Linus
, 27 2005, 01:59,Yedidyah Bar-David:
Now, recently Linus decided to move into a 4 numbers versions, and it
seems I am having problems with it. I checked several times, and I always
find that 2.6.12.2 fails to patch. (upgraded from 2.6.0 into 2.6.11 and
then run the
You meant
32 matches
Mail list logo
