Hello,
I have two Linux Desktops at home (both running Fedora Core 9).
I had connected both Desktop to a simple switch; also the ADSL bezeq
router (BFOCUS 312+) is connected to the switch.
One desktop has this ip address on eth0: 10.0.0.1
and on the second I configured 10.0.0.2 as the ip
Rafi,
You should configure your BFocus modem as a router for your network and
apply NAT on all outgoing traffic.
Take a look at post #14 in the following Israeli forum:
http://www.fresh.co.il/vBulletin/showthread.php?t=1373
- Noam
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Rafi Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
1) Thanks for the quick answer; I will try that.
2) Still I really wonder: can my goal be achieved
when using the bezeq ADSL as it is, using
configuring one of the desktops (which has 2 nics)
to be a bridge? Does anybody have an idea ?
Regards,
Rafi
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:10 PM,
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Rafi Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Still I really wonder: can my goal be achieved
when using the bezeq ADSL as it is, using
configuring one of the desktops (which has 2 nics)
to be a bridge? Does anybody have an idea ?
Yes, it is possible (anyhow, it's
Hi,
I tried to change the setting exactly according to the thread if
frehs.co.il that you
sent. Than I ran ifdown eth0 and ifup e
I am able to ping www.google.com and other sites ; however, when I
enter the URL of
www.google.com or www.yent.co.il I am unable to get a page ;
I must add that I did
Hi,
I now remember that I have observed a similar problem at my parents' place.
The thing is that even though the bfocus 312+ claims to provide proxy DNS
service, it has some major bugs in their implementation.
I suggest that you set your Linux boxes to use your ISP's DNS servers
directly and
Try Digikam
#
On Monday 29 September 2008, Amos Shapira wrote:
Hello,
I've been a happy Digikam user for many years now - managing photos
taken with camera and phone, burning CD's, editing etc.
I now need something which will allow me to do basic manipulation of
videos. I don't expect to
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 01:30:42PM +0300, Noam Meltzer wrote:
2- You want *real* control over every parameter in your router and the black
box supplied by ECI does not provide that.
I'd use this thread to raise another issue (although it might have been
nicer to start a new thread). This ECI
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 11:47:57PM +0300, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
I'd use this thread to raise another issue (although it might have been
nicer to start a new thread). This ECI 312+ is rather old - it's not
sold (or given) anymore, as far as I know. But it runs Linux inside, and
theoretically
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 12:16:04AM +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 11:47:57PM +0300, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
I'd use this thread to raise another issue (although it might have been
nicer to start a new thread). This ECI 312+ is rather old - it's not
sold (or
As much as I know, they contain MonteVista Linux.
They where built by a subcontractor in Taiwan and when I asked ECI in
Israel, they had no clue of what contractor and how can I get the sources.
I know that MonteVista Israel also tried with no success so far.
--
Ori Idan
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at
11 matches
Mail list logo
