As expected, unholy alliances beget monsters. Here is the 1st born.
Maybe 'dropped' is not the right term for 'Hula'. It was, er, debased
(like having the carpet pulled out from underneath it) ?
http://forge.novell.com/pipermail/hula-general/2006-November/002084.html
As expected, a prolifi
On 11/29/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe 'dropped' is not the right term for 'Hula'. It was, er, debased
(like having the carpet pulled out from underneath it) ?
It's not like Hula was moving anywhere, unless by "moving" you mean
something like Mozilla's "moving" when it took 5 years
I'm glad Ilya answered first, or I would have thought that maybe I'm
stuck in an opinion without letting reality check in.
Peter wrote:
> As expected,
Novell, at the moment, are a fish in a barrel. Once you decided that the
MS&Novell deal is unholy, anything they do is, in your eyes, an evil
man
El mié, 29-11-2006 a las 15:15 +0200, Shachar Shemesh escribió:
> A few years ago a new Linux distribution came along. It was called
> "Lindows", and it promised to use Wine in order to run your existing
> Windows applications on it. A couple of years later the company decided
> that Wine was not
Hi,
Just small remark..
A few years ago a new Linux distribution came along. It was called
"Lindows", and it promised to use Wine in order to run your existing
Windows applications on it. A couple of years later the company decided
that Wine was not getting there, and stopped sponsoring any mor
Julian Daich wrote:
> El mié, 29-11-2006 a las 15:15 +0200, Shachar Shemesh escribió:
>
>
>> A few years ago a new Linux distribution came along. It was called
>> "Lindows", and it promised to use Wine in order to run your existing
>> Windows applications on it. A couple of years later the comp
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just small remark..
>
>> A few years ago a new Linux distribution came along. It was called
>> "Lindows", and it promised to use Wine in order to run your existing
>> Windows applications on it. A couple of years later the company decided
>> that Wine was not getting
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Julian Daich wrote:
In conclusion, I think that this email is a bit paranoid.
Peter
Shachar
P.s.
Since some of the list's administrators have seemed to jump those guns
in the past, threatening actions, I would like to clarify that though I
think that Peter's email is par
On 11/29/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
b) vague concerns with regards to
any patented/0wned technology used in Hula (i.e. essentially proprietary
m$ messaging protocols used to communicate with real Exchange)
Just to put the record straight, Hula doesn't aim for any special
Exchange inte
Peter wrote:
> I do not consider myself paranoid,
I guess that makes the two of us.
> I would like to add that in view of what m$'s history of 'cooperation'
> with other entities looks like, I consider that people who are not
> paranoid about what happens in such instances overdose their
> Ritalin
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
Just to put the record straight, Hula doesn't aim for any special
Exchange interop. Essentially, it's an attempt by Novell to resurrect
a dead product called NetMail, which they happily sold without any
patent concerns (till it got old and irrelevan
El mié, 29-11-2006 a las 16:40 +0200, Shachar Shemesh escribió:
> Julian Daich wrote:
>
> > El mié, 29-11-2006 a las 15:15 +0200, Shachar Shemesh escribió:
> >
> >
> >> A few years ago a new Linux distribution came along. It was called
> >> "Lindows", and it promised to use Wine in order to run
With¨ paid¨ do you mean that MS lost the case?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_v._Lindows
Peter
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo
El mié, 29-11-2006 a las 16:40 +0200, Shachar Shemesh escribió:
> > but¨ Lindows¨ became¨ Linspire¨ and they were granted by
> > Microsoft with the rights to use or distribute codecs as the win32
> > package and other proprietary software within their distribution.
> >
> Which, you have agree,
Julian Daich wrote:
>> The suing party (MS) paid the defendants (Lindows) to change their name,
>> understanding that if the trial does go forward MS will lose their
>> trademark.
>>
> With¨ paid¨ do you mean that MS lost the case?
>
Nobody lost it. It was settled out of court.
>> Which,
15 matches
Mail list logo
