Re: Confusing Mirrors

2001-01-16 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > I am looking for a version of glib >= 1.2.7 and gcc >= 2.95. > glibc is also in www.gnu.org Try to read the question before you reply. Omer asked about Glib, you answered about Glibc. Those are two different libraries! BTW: Your m

Re: Confusing Mirrors

2001-01-16 Thread Ely Levy
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, guy keren wrote: | | On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Omer Zak wrote: | | > I am looking for a version of glib >= 1.2.7 and gcc >= 2.95. | > I started browsing the mirrors at | > ftp://ftp.iglu.org.il/pub/distributions/, and quickly got confused. | | when you want official inf

Re: Confusing Mirrors

2001-01-16 Thread mulix
hi guy, the information below is not entirely correct. the official statement from the gcc project is available at: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html i have been unable to find redhat's official response to this issue, but have seen it before. short sum (be warned that my memory sometimes has par

Re: Confusing Mirrors

2001-01-16 Thread guy keren
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Omer Zak wrote: > I am looking for a version of glib >= 1.2.7 and gcc >= 2.95. > I started browsing the mirrors at > ftp://ftp.iglu.org.il/pub/distributions/, and quickly got confused. when you want official info - look at the code's "owner" web site. with gc - it's somewhe

Confusing Mirrors

2001-01-15 Thread Omer Zak
I am looking for a version of glib >= 1.2.7 and gcc >= 2.95. I started browsing the mirrors at ftp://ftp.iglu.org.il/pub/distributions/, and quickly got confused. I remember that there was some stench about gcc version 2.96 or something. Where can I RTFM the authoritative information about versi