I found the lectures today rather unimpressive, although the event itself
was quite nice and well organized.
Some specific notes:
1. The "Ila" guy seemed to misunderstand the whole "use Linux in govt."
proposition. This has been discussed a lot, but worth repeating:
His argument was that if Lin
Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
I found the lectures today rather unimpressive, although the event
itself was quite nice and well organized.
Some specific notes:
1. The "Ila" guy seemed to misunderstand the whole "use Linux in
govt." proposition. This has been discussed a lot, but worth repeating:
Quoting Alexander Maryanovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1. The "Ila" guy seemed to misunderstand the whole "use Linux in govt."
> proposition. This has been discussed a lot, but worth repeating:
>His argument was that if Linux is good, it should compete and win based
> on that, and not on a law.
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
> I found the lectures today rather unimpressive, although the event itself
> was quite nice and well organized.
> Some specific notes:
> 1. The "Ila" guy seemed to misunderstand the whole "use Linux in govt."
> proposition. This has been discussed
Therefore it can be argued that the government should require software to be
auditable by some means, but not to force Linux specifically, or even free
software in general. For example, assume that MSFT gives the government a peek
at their source code, subject to NDA and a license written by the
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 16:24:04 +0200, Alexander Maryanovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 3. Linux is Open Source? FreeBSD is Free Software? Am I missing something
> here? Last I checked, Linux was GPL and FreeBSD was BSD, making Linux Free
> Software and FreeBSD OSS. I would've believed it was an
Quoting Alexander Maryanovsky, from the post of Wed, 08 Jan:
> 1. The "Ila" guy seemed to misunderstand the whole "use Linux in
> govt." proposition. This has been discussed a lot, but worth
> repeating: His argument was that if Linux is good, it should compete
> and win based on that, and not on a
Quoting Shlomi Fish, from the post of Wed, 08 Jan:
>
> Naturally, I was disappointed that Stallman did not show up, but still I
> did not find it disappointed because I got to meet a lot of my Linuxer
> friends whom I do not get to meet very often (IRL, that is).
yeah, I fealt anxious by the numb
Ira Abramov wrote:
Red Hat are not "in the black" AFAIK either.
Actually, they are:
http://www.commweb.com/article/IWK20021217S0007
Cheers,
Henry
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe"
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 06:24, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
> Especially disappointing was Moshe Bar's lecture. I've only heard about him
> until now, but since he teaches the "OS design" class in TAU (which I'm
> going to have to take for my degree), I assumed he's more knowledgeable
> that that
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Ira Abramov wrote:
> > 2. Nobody is making money from selling Free software? This may be true
> > per se, but it's a very bad statement. There are many companies who
> > are making money *developing* Free software, so who cares if they're
>
> and proof was Zend and a few others
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:18:26PM +0200, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Shlomi Fish, from the post of Wed, 08 Jan:
> >
> > Naturally, I was disappointed that Stallman did not show up, but still I
> > did not find it disappointed because I got to meet a lot of my Linuxer
> > friends whom I do not ge
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 04:24:04PM +0200, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
> I found the lectures today rather unimpressive, although the event itself
> was quite nice and well organized.
Come to the event in Haifa tomorrow (today) (if you registered in
advance), should be much more technical and les
Quoting Muli Ben-Yehuda, from the post of Thu, 09 Jan:
> I'm going to give a talk on kernel hacking ("your kernel just
> oopsed. What do you do? what do you do?") at the bi weekly Haifux
> meeting on Monday, Jan 20th. All that want to drop by are most
> welcome, and we'll be going out for Sushi aft
Quoting Muli Ben-Yehuda, from the post of Thu, 09 Jan:
> Again, the Haifa event has been slated from the beginning as
> technical, while the TAU event has been slated as
> "marketing/introductory" oriented. Hope to see you in Haifa!
damn. for some reason I was convinced it was the same set of lect
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:18:26PM +0200, Ira Abramov wrote:
> > Quoting Shlomi Fish, from the post of Wed, 08 Jan:
> > >
> > > Naturally, I was disappointed that Stallman did not show up, but still I
> > > did not find it disappointed because I got to
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:18:26PM +0200, Ira Abramov wrote:
> > > Quoting Shlomi Fish, from the post of Wed, 08 Jan:
[snip]
> Can you please not go to Sushi? Chinese food or Italian Food or Pizza or
Chin
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote about "Re: IBM lecture(s) rant":
> Can you please not go to Sushi? Chinese food or Italian Food or Pizza or
> Nando's or Mizrahi or whatever will be much better for me. I cannot think
And if Muli prefers Sushi over Italian/Nandos,
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote about "Re: IBM lecture(s) rant":
> > Can you please not go to Sushi? Chinese food or Italian Food or Pizza or
> > Nando's or Mizrahi or whatever will be much better for me. I c
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:18:26PM +0200, Ira Abramov wrote:
> > > > Quoting Shlomi Fish, from the post of Wed, 08 Jan:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Can you pleas
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 06:20:06PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote about "Re: IBM lecture(s) rant":
> > Can you please not go to Sushi? Chinese food or Italian Food or Pizza or
> > Nando's or Mizrahi or whatever will be
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 06:20:06PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote about "Re: IBM lecture(s) rant":
> > > Can you please not go to Sushi? Chinese food or Italian Food or Piz
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:30:29PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Do they serve other food there? If so I'll gladly come. (unless people
> smoke there of course)
They do, and people do smoke there. The number of completely non
smoking restaurants in Haifa that I know of is far too small.
In any ca
Shlomi Fish wrote:
> We can easily go to Nando's instead. They serve only various variations of
> Chicken and other entrees, but the food is very good.
>
> Do they serve other food there? If so I'll gladly come. (unless people
> smoke there of course)
No.
I was not planing on going to this one
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> > We can easily go to Nando's instead. They serve only various variations of
> > Chicken and other entrees, but the food is very good.
> >
> > Do they serve other food there? If so I'll gladly come. (unless people
> > smoke
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote about "Re: IBM lecture(s) rant":
> I was not planing on going to this one, but if I did I could not even
> go into a nando's (I'm allergic to chicken) It is not a place
> for people who can't/won't eat chick
"Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, Nandos is indeed not a very diverse place. Chicken this,
> chicken that. Just missing is Alcoholic chicken [1] :)
Oh, but they do have "alcoholic chicken": they used to run a promotion
(mivtsa) where you got a free beer (yeah, I managed to throw
Quoting Ira Abramov, from the post of Thu, 09 Jan:
> damn. for some reason I was convinced it was the same set of lectures in
> two locations. now I'm sad I decided to go to TAU rather than the one in
> Haifa... do send in notes and summeries (and anecdotes, and...)
>
> thanks :)
WELL? what was
> -Original Message-
> From: Shlomi Fish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Can you please not go to Sushi? Chinese food or Italian Food
> or Pizza or
> Nando's or Mizrahi or whatever will be much better for me. I
> cannot think
> of eating small servings of raw fish with a little rice. I hear
Quoting Arik Baratz, from the post of Thu, 09 Jan:
> I'd like to offset the opinions that you have had by saying that Sushi
> is delightfully tasety, and not at all disgusting. It is real food,
> eaten by real people, many of which are in Japan. It is far from
> poisonous, with the single exception
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Arik Baratz, from the post of Thu, 09 Jan:
> > I'd like to offset the opinions that you have had by saying that Sushi
> > is delightfully tasety, and not at all disgusting. It is real food,
> > eaten by real people, many of which are in Japan. It is
Quoth Shlomi Fish:
> Kudos to the pun. If there is cooked food, which is similar to something I
> know, I'm all for it. I always like to taste new dishes. But Linux Dinners
> are somewhere I'd rather stick to something I know would be tasty in
> advance. The reason is that the point is the company
te List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Ira Abramov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Sushi (was RE: IBM lecture(s) rant)
> Quoth Shlomi Fish:
>
> > Kudos to the pun. If there is cooked food, which is similar to someth
acred traditional instrument).
Also, can anyone add to the Linux-IL FAQ a prohibition about discussing
what kinds of food one doesn't want to consume?
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote about "Re: IBM lecture(s) rant":
> &
34 matches
Mail list logo
