Re: [arrest@tmicha.net: Warning! Your message was rejected]

2003-08-03 Thread Oded Arbel
On Saturday 02 August 2003 17:59, Vasiliev Michael wrote: The majority noted that small ISPs don't even respect their own spam policies (if they have one) in fear of losing valuable broadband users. I'd say that most ISP's - even large ones - don't respect their own spam policies, at least in

Re: [arrest@tmicha.net: Warning! Your message was rejected]

2003-08-03 Thread Herouth Maoz
Quoting Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd say that most ISP's - even large ones - don't respect their own spam policies, at least in Israel. I don't remember one account where I contacted an ISP with regard of a spammer on their network and got a favourable response. I used to do that for

Re: [arrest@tmicha.net: Warning! Your message was rejected]

2003-08-03 Thread Mix Sella
On Saturday 02 August 2003 05:42, Shaul Karl wrote: I got a similar message for the 2 last messages that I have sent to the list. I guess that I will have another one for this message too. Was there a modification to the list policies lately regarding the header of the messages that are sent

Re: [arrest@tmicha.net: Warning! Your message was rejected]

2003-08-03 Thread Mix Sella
On Saturday 02 August 2003 17:59, Vasiliev Michael wrote: On Saturday 02 August 2003 14:33, Guy Cohen wrote: They still do nothing. This is absolutly disrespct for good paying customers!!! Well, once, in my free time, I interviewed a number of well known sysadmins on a certain IRC

RE: [arrest@tmicha.net: Warning! Your message was rejected]

2003-08-03 Thread Arik Baratz
-Original Message- From: Shaul Karl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 5:43 AM [snip] Hello all You are talking about the SPAM problem but ignoring a bigger problem: The misuse of SMTP. This announcement is automatic; yet instead of replying to the envelope

Re: [arrest@tmicha.net: Warning! Your message was rejected]

2003-08-02 Thread Oleg Kobets
Hi. I have received similar message from thmicha.net as well. As I can see we both use Actcom as our provider, it seems to me that Actcom is listed in one the spam lists that tmicha.net uses for email screening. Perhaps we should notify them of this issue. Oleg. - Original Message -

Re: [arrest@tmicha.net: Warning! Your message was rejected]

2003-08-02 Thread Guy Cohen
Yes you are right... Actcom is very close to lose my vote (and my monthly fee).. I have informed them 3 times in the last 2 month about spam that is coming from there network. actually to be more specific from 192.115.135.186 (main.retal.co.il). with specific logs of spam attempts from this user

Re: [arrest@tmicha.net: Warning! Your message was rejected]

2003-08-02 Thread Shaul Karl
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:23:45PM +0300, Guy Cohen wrote: Yes you are right... Actcom is very close to lose my vote (and my monthly fee).. I have informed them 3 times in the last 2 month about spam that is coming from there network. actually to be more specific from 192.115.135.186

Re: [arrest@tmicha.net: Warning! Your message was rejected]

2003-08-02 Thread Shaul Karl
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:02:34PM +0200, Oleg Kobets wrote: Hi. I have received similar message from thmicha.net as well. As I can see we both use Actcom as our provider, it seems to me that Actcom is listed in one the spam lists that tmicha.net uses for email screening. Perhaps we should

Re: [arrest@tmicha.net: Warning! Your message was rejected]

2003-08-02 Thread Guy Cohen
No, this is the same thing. This person at main.retal.org.il was sending spam, he tried to use my mail server, and when was not succeding probably used other methods. The point is Actcom does not do anyhting and does not care. Guy On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:50:22PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: On

Re: [arrest@tmicha.net: Warning! Your message was rejected]

2003-08-02 Thread Vasiliev Michael
On Saturday 02 August 2003 14:33, Guy Cohen wrote: They still do nothing. This is absolutly disrespct for good paying customers!!! Well, once, in my free time, I interviewed a number of well known sysadmins on a certain IRC network asking what they do to deal with these pesky spammers. The