These are patches designed to improve system responsiveness. It is
configurable to any workload but the default ck* patch is aimed at the
desktop and ck*-server is available with more emphasis on serverspace.
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.11/2.6.11-ck2/patch-2.6.11-ck2.bz2
web:
I think ur idea of generating a random number
with a seed will not be effective. The kernel comes up
with true random number generation by using the random
interaction of device drivers with the kernel. I think
that will be more effective than ur logic. It provides
true randomness and it
Hi Benjamin,
Few coding style nitpicks follow.
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 18:11:59 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Index: linux-work/include/linux/pci.h
===
--- linux-work.orig/include/linux/pci.h 2005-01-24
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives
that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
way in the future.
IMHO it sould be
With 2.6 kernels we've noticed that there's a period during booting that
the serial console output is messed up. Most probable cause is a wrong
baud rate.
This is on Dell rackmount servers, with the serial console running at
115200 baud. The BIOS works fine, GRUB works fine, the first part of the
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:28:32AM +, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
With that full tarball for 2.6.11.X the issues would be over.
I think there should be one.
It's already there
Marado
cu
Adrian
--
Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the
Any sense of how costly it is to use spin_lock_irq's vs spin_lock
(across different architectures) ? Isn't rwsem used very widely ?
Regards
Suparna
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:33:58AM +, David Howells wrote:
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we want to take the spinlock from
Suparna Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any sense of how costly it is to use spin_lock_irq's vs spin_lock
(across different architectures) ? Isn't rwsem used very widely ?
It's only on the slow path, and we've already done a bunch of atomic ops
and a schedule()/wakeup() anyway.
-
To
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 16:34 +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
Any sense of how costly it is to use spin_lock_irq's vs spin_lock
(across different architectures)
on x86 it makes a difference of maybe a few cycles. At most.
However please consider using spin_lock_irqsave(); the _irq() variant,
Hi all!
What is the maximal data I can write to a /proc file? I write two kilo bytes,
but buffer in the proc_write function only contains 1003 bytes :-((
Cheers, Kristian.
--
Kristian Sørensen
- The Umbrella Project -- Security for Consumer Electronics
http://umbrella.sourceforge.net
-
To
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 16:34 +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
Any sense of how costly it is to use spin_lock_irq's vs spin_lock
(across different architectures) ? Isn't rwsem used very widely ?
oh also rwsems aren't used all that much simply because they are quite
more expensive than regular
On St 09-03-05 09:52:46, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote:
which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives
that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
way in the
Suparna Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any sense of how costly it is to use spin_lock_irq's vs spin_lock
(across different architectures) ? Isn't rwsem used very widely ?
On P4s cli/sti is quite costly, let's says 100+ cycles. That is mostly
because it synchronizes the CPU partly. The
I looked at some of the oops reports against keyrings, I think the problem
is that the search isn't restarted after dropping the key_user_lock,
*p will still be NULL when we get back to try_again and look through the tree.
It looks like the intention was that the search start over from scratch.
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 16:34 +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
Any sense of how costly it is to use spin_lock_irq's vs spin_lock
(across different architectures)
on x86 it makes a difference of maybe a few cycles. At most.
However please consider
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives
that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 16:34 +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
Any sense of how costly it is to use spin_lock_irq's vs spin_lock
(across different architectures) ? Isn't rwsem used very widely ?
oh also rwsems aren't used all that much simply
Roberts-Thomson, James wrote:
I've been trying to investigate an IO performance issue on my machine, as
part of this I've noticed what is (presumably only a cosmetic) issue with
the messages displayed at kernel boot-time.
Agree, purely cosmetic.
In the good old days (i.e. older 2.6.x kernel
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 16:34 +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
Any sense of how costly it is to use spin_lock_irq's vs spin_lock
(across different architectures)
on x86 it makes a difference of maybe a few cycles. At most.
However please consider
This patch adds dummy gameport_register_port, gameport_unregister_port
and gameport_set_phys functions to gameport.h for the case when a driver
can't use gameport.
This fixes the compilation of some OSS drivers with GAMEPORT=n without
the need to #if inside every single driver.
This patch
Hi!
Fbsplash - The Framebuffer Splash - is a feature that allows displaying
images in the background of consoles that use fbcon. The project is
partially descended from bootsplash.
What are you trying to do exactly? I really don't see the point of this
patch.
At least some Debians,
Hello,
We sent you an email a while ago, because you now qualify
for a much lower rate based on the biggest rate drop in years.
You can now get $327,000 for as little as $617 a month!
Bad credit? Doesn't matter, low rates are fixed no matter what!
Follow this link to process your application
Vojtech Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think I have a patch for the MX1000 among them. I do have the
MX1000, though, and I'm still thinking about what to do with it.
;)
The problem is that the mouse really does reports all the double-button
stuff and autorepeat, and horizontal
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spin_lock_irq() is OK for down_*(), since down() can call schedule() anyway.
spin_lock_irqsave() should be used in up_*() and I guess down_*_trylock(),
although the latter shouldn't need to go into the slowpath anyway.
That's what I've done. I'm just
I looked at some of the oops reports against keyrings, I think the problem
is that the search isn't restarted after dropping the key_user_lock,
*p will still be NULL when we get back to try_again and look through the tree.
It looks like the intention was that the search start over from scratch.
I just see that this patch went into mainline.
[PATCH] posix-timers: high-resolution CPU clocks for POSIX clock_* syscalls
This patch provides support for thread and process CPU time clocks in the
/*
+ * This is called on clock ticks and on context switches.
+ * Bank in p-sched_time the
Hi all,
I am running Redhat 9 Linux.
I have problem with compiling the i810fb driver downloaded from
Sourceforge site. I have D/W the i810fb patch
linux-i810fb-0.0.35.tar.bz2.
When I run the make modules I get the following ERROR
i810_main.c: 643: warning: passing arg 1 of
The attached patch makes read/write semaphores use interrupt disabling
spinlocks, thus rendering the up functions and trylock functions available for
use in interrupt context.
I've assumed that the normal down functions must be called with interrupts
enabled (since they might schedule), and used
--- Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Tangent: I would like to see requests-for-testing for FC
kernels on LKML.
If people announce -ac/-as/-aa/-ck/etc. kernels on LKML, why
not distro
kernels?
Because some people switched to other distribution also
because of the
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Mukund JB. wrote:
Hi all,
I am running Redhat 9 Linux.
I have problem with compiling the i810fb driver downloaded from
Sourceforge site. I have D/W the i810fb patch
linux-i810fb-0.0.35.tar.bz2.
When I run the make modules I get the following ERROR
i810_main.c: 643: warning:
which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives
that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
way in the future.
It seems to me that we have V (delta?) and VI (delta incremental) for
all the other kernel patch series. So perhaps we could have both,
Please suggest me what could be the problem.
the problem is that you are using a way way way too old kernel. I
suggest you fix that first
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Hello,
While installing DCE 0.1.13 on RH Linux AS 2.1 Kernel 2.4.18-e.54smp
running on Itanium, the system hangs and becomes unbootable. It then has
to be started in single user mode, the dce rpm has to be removed and
then booted. This happens with kernel patch 52/54.
Has anyone faced a
Dominik Brodowski wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 12:35:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Dominik Brodowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
compiling -mm2 on my x86 box results in:
SYSMAP .tmp_System.map
Inconsistent kallsyms data
Try setting CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS
make: *** [vmlinux] Fehler 1
Does it work correctly under any other kernel versions? If so, which?
I just tried with 2.4.29, and it has the same problems.
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, George Georgalis announced authoritatively:
Here's what I'm doing that is broken. I use tcpserver (functionally
similar to inetd) to receive an incoming smtp connection. While the
smtp session is still open, the message is piped to a temp file which
is then scanned for
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:12, Jan Kara wrote:
Isn't also the following scenario dangerous?
__journal_unfile_buffer(jh);
journal_remove_journal_head(bh);
It depends. I think the biggest problem here is that there's really no
written rule protecting this stuff universally. But in
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 18:21 +0530, Singal, Manoj Kumar (STSD) wrote:
Hello,
While installing DCE 0.1.13 on RH Linux AS 2.1 Kernel 2.4.18-e.54smp
running on Itanium, the system hangs and becomes unbootable. It then has
to be started in single user mode, the dce rpm has to be removed and
then
Hi Christian,
Could you check the mm/oom_kill.c for your kernel 2.6.11-rc3?
During the 2.6.11-rc development, the oom killer was changed by Andrea
Arcangeli. I do not remember exactly which was the version that this
modification was included, perhaps in kernel 2.6.11-rc4.
Now this oom killer
Hello,
I just connected an Ultratrak SX8000 instead of the Ultratrak100 TX8,
and it seems to work without a problem...
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Tony Luck wrote:
Take a look at the driver (fs/proc/kcore.c) that creates this pseudo-file.
will do ;)
Initially the size of the file is set from the size of your memory.
Reading the file has the side-effect of setting up the ELF headers to make
this look like an ELF file ... in fact a
...replying to myself: it happened again!
switched back to 2.6.11-rc5-bk2, details will follow.
thanks,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #311:
transient bus protocol violation
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
Hello,
In the ChangeLog-2.6.11 file I read that the enhanced I/O accounting
data patch and the enhanced memory accounting data collection patch were
added. It's cool but I don't see how this stuff is used because
information is never dump in a file or send to an accounting application
(or I
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:12, Jan Kara wrote:
Isn't also the following scenario dangerous?
__journal_unfile_buffer(jh);
journal_remove_journal_head(bh);
It depends. I think the biggest problem here is that there's really no
written rule protecting this stuff universally. But
Hi,
I have some questions regarding the page descriptors in the linux kernel with
discontig memory support.
According to my understanding memory for page descriptors is allocated from
the
bootmem allocator and that for pg_dat_t structure comes from the
node_remap_start addr.
So the first
Hi Christian,
I found the 2.6.11-rc3 patch. The oom killer modification from
Arcangeli was included in 2.6.11-rc3. Right? So this is correct, so
the problem is not related to Arcangeli modification.
Does anyone have idea?
BR,
Mauricio Lin.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:18:31 -0400, Mauricio Lin
Mauricio Lin wrote:
Hi Christian,
I found the 2.6.11-rc3 patch. The oom killer modification from
Arcangeli was included in 2.6.11-rc3. Right? So this is correct, so
the problem is not related to Arcangeli modification.
Does anyone have idea?
hi Mauricio,
thank you for your answers, but
Hi
There is a bug in make menuconfig. If one chooses 386 or 486 for cpu
type, CONFIG_X86_TSC=y is set in .config. This creates a kernel that is
unbootable on 386. Testing shows that it worked in 2.4.19, but is broken
from 2.4.20 onwards. Someone should definetely look into this.
(I'm not
Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 11:00 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
That sounds good. But we loose the advantage of doing limited debugging
with gdb. Crash (or other analysis tools) will still take considerable
amount of time before before they are fully ready
Hi,
I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
and reliable. During S3 I've measured a power consumption of 1400
to 1500 mWh (using 512 megabytes of RAM). Is there still room for
optimization? What's the
Lee Revell wrote:
OK, I have run some simple tests with JACK, Hydrogen, and 2.6.11.
2.6.11 does not seem to be much of an improvement over 2.6.10. It may
in fact be slightly worse. This was what I expected, as it appears that
a number of latency fixes in the VM got preempted by the 4-level page
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:03:21 -0500 (EST), linux-os
You can't measure interrupt latency that way even
though you may get the correct answer!
Why do you think the technique is not valid?
Make a simple module that uses IRQ7, the printer-port
interrupt. Inside your ISR, you toggle one of the
Dear All,
I have developed a small module in Fedora Core 3 with 2.6.9-1.667 kernel
version. This module uses the interruptible_sleep_on_timeout call and
one proc entry in it. After inserting the module when I try to cat the
/proc entry I got the following messages on the screen.
jit_init
source drivers/scsi/megaraid/Kconfig.megaraid
+source drivers/scsi/megaraid/Kconfig.megaraid_sas
why a fully separate file and not add your ONE config option to
Kconfig.megaraid instead ??
Arjan, I didn't want to needlessly couple megaraid and megaraid_sas.
Since they are in
Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
and reliable. During S3 I've measured a power consumption of 1400
to 1500 mWh (using 512 megabytes of RAM). Is
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 16:34 +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
Any sense of how costly it is to use spin_lock_irq's vs spin_lock
(across different architectures) ? Isn't rwsem used very
Dear All,
I have developed a small module in Fedora Core 3 with 2.6.9-1.667 kernel
version. This module uses the interruptible_sleep_on_timeout call and
one proc entry in it. After inserting the module when I try to cat the
/proc entry I got the following messages on the screen.
jit_init
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:09:58 -0700 (MST), Zwane Mwaikambo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At some cpu frequency point on i386 the main cause of your interrupt
service latency will be in the interrupt controller and how long from irq
assertion to the signal being recognised, resultant vector being
I will make this an instance parameter if the idea to reduce as many
global variables as possible. But if the objection is because each
adapter
may have different value for variable, then it is indeed a global
value.
is_dma64 - which is computed using the size of dma_addr_t - is
telling
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:17:49AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 11:00 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
This also requires, setting the kernel virtual addresses while preparing
the headers. KVA for linearly mapped region is
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 08:07:57PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:54:04PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
1. return EINVAL if the DIO goes past EOF.
2. truncate the request to file size (which is what your patch does)
and if it works, it works.
3.
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 13:28, Jan Kara wrote:
Hmm. I see for example a place at jbd/commit.c, line 287 (which you
did not change in your patch) which does this and doesn't seem to be
protected against journal_unmap_buffer() (but maybe I miss something).
Not that I'd find that race
This patch is against 2.6.11.
The Mobility docking station provides a PCI-based parallel port. Since
the docking station connects via Cardbus, such devices are removable.
Therefore, track which parallel ports are registered to each PCI device,
and remove them when the PCI device is
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:06:11PM +, Nix wrote:
An interesting technique that allows a program (such as a log writer)
to run as an unprivileged user, while receiving privileged data. (taken
almost verbatim from Gerrit Pape's socklog)
#!/bin/sh
exec /proc/kmsg
exec 21
exec softlimit
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:28:32AM +, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Dominik Karall wrote:
which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives
that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
way in the future.
IMHO it
Last night, I did a bk pull from linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6,
built and rebooted, and the pppd (version 2.4.2) failed to start
after the modem at the ISP end answered.
I usually keep the kernel fairly up-to-date with bk, and I'm
certain that 2.6.11-vanilla ran pppd just fine a few days earlier.
I
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:26:30 +0100, Weber Matthias wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 20:05:42 +0100, Weber Matthias wrote:
is there any chance to signal an EOF when writing data to kernel via proc
fs? Actually if the length of data is N*PAGE_SIZE it seems not to be
detectable.
I
Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:55:33PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
+static ssize_t jsm_driver_boards_show(struct device_driver *ddp, char *buf)
+{
+ int adapter_count = 0;
+ adapter_count = jsm_total_boardnum();
+ return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, %d\n, adapter_count);
+}
+static
On Maw, 2005-03-08 at 22:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Really - so does it go to the PCI maintainer, the IDE maintainer or the
DRI maintainer or someone else, or all of them, or in bits to different
ones remembering there are dependancies and I don't use bitcreeper ?
If you don't know send
Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:42:31PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
The following email I got from Scott Kilau in digi:
Scott Kilau wrote:
The DPA program is very old, and is shared among other drivers
and OS's,
so changing the code to read the sysfs instead of doing ioctls
On Middeweken 09 Mrz 2005 03:05, Michal Januszewski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:17:11AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
change_console()
complete_change_console()
switch_screen() == redraw_screen()
con_switch() == fbcon_switch()
From inside fbcon_switch(), we need to call the splash
szonyi calin wrote:
Let me tell you what i understood from this thread:
2.6.12 almost stable
2.6.13 devel (new drivers,fixes and stuff -- may be broken)
2.6.14 (based on 2.6.13) tries to became stable again
2.6.15 also devel (see above)
2.6.16 (based on 2.6.15) also tries to became stable again
. And since this is compile time
system-wide property, I kept it as driver global.
that step I don't understand... why is it a global *VARIABLE* if it's
compile time system-wide property...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
On Mer, 2005-03-09 at 07:26, CaT wrote:
Carried over from 2.6.10-ac
BTW. What's the probability of the ITE driver making it into the stock
kernel?
I have given up caring about the base kernel IDE code. I've tried to get
stuff submitted and failed. I've no plan to waste further time on it.
Hi,
On Tuesday, 8 of March 2005 13:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
]-- snip --[
Now, akpm sent all (?) swsusp updates to Linus, so it should appear in
bk tree later today. If you could regenerate the patches (1/3 will no
longer be needed) and send them to me l-k. I'll then forward them to
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 20:12 +0530, Srinivas G. wrote:
I have developed a small module in Fedora Core 3 with 2.6.9-1.667
kernel
version. This module uses the interruptible_sleep_on_timeout call and
don't use interruptible_sleep_on_timeout()
really.
(and if you want to use the
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 17:44, Daniel McNeil wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 11:18, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Andrew, please don't apply the original patch. We shouldn't even attempt
to submit IO beyond the filesize. We should truncate the IO request to
filesize. I will send a patch today to
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 10:44:25PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 05:46:51PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
+static ssize_t jsm_tty_baud_show(struct class_device *class_dev, char *buf)
+{
+ struct jsm_channel *ch;
+
+ if (class_dev) {
+ ch =
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:47:45PM -0600, Kilau, Scott wrote:
For example, lets say a customer has a modem connected to a serial port.
If you were to open up the port with an stty -a to get the current
settings and signals, you would unintentionally raise RTS and DTR.
That isn't special to
On Monday 07 March 2005 19:28, Ryan Anderson wrote:
Make the deb-pkg build target understand the um arch and set up the
package and directory structure to match a mainline-Debian style
user-mode-linux package.
This is primarily so that it stops matching, exactly, the naming
convention used
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:18:16PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
ChangeSet 1.1998.11.27, 2005/02/25 15:48:28-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] PCI: One more Asus SMBus quirk
One more Asus laptop requiring the SMBus quirk (W1N model).
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:26:46 +1100, CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:34:22PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
For a couple of reasons I've not yet merged Greg's 2.6.11.1 yet but this
diff should actually apply to either right now.
2.6.11-ac1
o Fix jbd race in ext3
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:47:22AM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
+static ssize_t jsm_driver_debug_show(struct device_driver *ddp, char *buf)
+{
+ return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, 0x%x\n, jsm_debug);
+}
+static DRIVER_ATTR(debug, S_IRUSR, jsm_driver_debug_show, NULL);
Should just be a module
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:50:04AM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
+/* Ioctls needed for dpa operation */
+#define DIGI_GETDD ('d'8) | 248 /* get driver info */
+#define DIGI_GETBD ('d'8) | 249 /* get board info */
+#define DIGI_GET_NI_INFO ('d'8) | 250 /*
. And since this is compile time
system-wide property, I kept it as driver global.
that step I don't understand... why is it a global *VARIABLE* if it's
compile time system-wide property...
I see your point! Are you saying I should use if(sizeof(dma_addr_t)==8)
instead of the shortcut
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:06:15AM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:18:16PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
ChangeSet 1.1998.11.27, 2005/02/25 15:48:28-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] PCI: One more Asus SMBus
On Mer, 2005-03-09 at 16:26, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
It can be merged if somebody fix it to always force controller into
non-RAID mode and remove RAID mode support (which currently
does nothing more besides complicating the driver and making special
commands unusable).
Incorrect
-
CC: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it should be there, please check better.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/x86_64/kernel/sys_x86_64.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:38:43 +, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mer, 2005-03-09 at 16:26, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
It can be merged if somebody fix it to always force controller into
non-RAID mode and remove RAID mode support (which currently
does nothing more besides
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 23:37:29 +0100, Michal Januszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 04:18:07AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
It should probably just use its own hotplug agent instead of calling
the helper directly.
I've just had a look at it, and it seems possible. From
On Maw, 2005-03-08 at 17:40, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
ChangeSet 1.2094, 2005/03/08 09:40:59-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] remove dead cyrix/centaur mtrr init code
This patch was discussed previously and declared incorrect. The -init
method call is missing in the base mtrr
On Tuesday, March 8, 2005 9:58 pm, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:37:13 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 23:35 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
This is from /linux-2.5/Documentation/filesystems/sysfs-pci.txt. It
describes how ia64 is achieving
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unify the spinlock initialization as far as possible.
Signed-off-by: Amit Gud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Paolo
On Maw, 2005-03-08 at 17:39, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
ChangeSet 1.2088, 2005/03/08 09:39:30-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] Support for GEODE CPUs
This patch is also incorrect.
This patch has been on my homepage
Something in the last 24hrs in linus bk broke my ability to mount root:
Creating root device
Mounting root filesystem
mount: error 6 mounting ext3
mount: error 2 mounting none
Switching to new root
Switchroot: mount failed 22
umount /initrd/dev failed: 2
If I back off a day everything works
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
This patch was discussed previously and declared incorrect.
Well, it was also declared as a don't care by Dave, I think, by virtue
of nobody having ever complained.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 11:01 -0500, Bagalkote, Sreenivas wrote:
. And since this is compile time
system-wide property, I kept it as driver global.
that step I don't understand... why is it a global *VARIABLE* if it's
compile time system-wide property...
I see your point! Are you
Andrew Morton wrote on Tuesday, March 08, 2005 10:28 PM
But before doing anything else, please bench this on real hardware,
see if it is worth pursuing.
Let me answer the questions in reverse order. We started with running
industry standard transaction processing database benchmark on 2.6
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:47:22AM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
+static ssize_t jsm_driver_debug_show(struct device_driver *ddp, char *buf)
+{
+ return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, 0x%x\n, jsm_debug);
+}
+static DRIVER_ATTR(debug, S_IRUSR, jsm_driver_debug_show, NULL);
Should just be
Jon Smirl wrote:
Something in the last 24hrs in linus bk broke my ability to mount root:
Creating root device
Mounting root filesystem
mount: error 6 mounting ext3
mount: error 2 mounting none
Switching to new root
Switchroot: mount failed 22
umount /initrd/dev failed: 2
If I back off a day
501 - 600 of 937 matches
Mail list logo
