On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:16:23PM -0700, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:00:12AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 11:39 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:23:22AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > SCHEDULER:
> > > > > ...
>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:00:12AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 11:39 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:23:22AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > SCHEDULER:
> > > > ...
> > > > R: Steven Rostedt (kernel/sched/rt.c)
> > > > R: Juri Lelli (kerne
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 11:39 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:23:22AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > SCHEDULER:
> > > ...
> > > R: Steven Rostedt (kernel/sched/rt.c)
> > > R: Juri Lelli (kernel/sched/deadline.c)
> >
> > Maybe a better syntax might be something lik
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:23:22AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > SCHEDULER:
> > ...
> > R: Steven Rostedt (kernel/sched/rt.c)
> > R: Juri Lelli (kernel/sched/deadline.c)
>
> Maybe a better syntax might be something like:
> R:Steven Rostedt
> F: kernel/sched/rt.c
>
> where
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 19:42 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:09:25PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 15:25 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:05:16PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > []
> > > > I still think the concept is
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:09:25PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 15:25 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:05:16PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> []
> > > I still think the concept is pretty useless and it's
> > > just a duplication of "M:", which isn't an
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 10:00 -0700, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:09:25PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > I wrote a script to find which maintainer addresses that
> > haven't signed or authored a commit in the last 2 years.
>
> Did you count Acked-by or Reviewed-by line
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:09:25PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 15:25 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:05:16PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> []
> > > I still think the concept is pretty useless and it's
> > > just a duplication of "M:", which isn't an
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 04:14 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:09:25PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > I wrote a script to find which maintainer addresses that
> > haven't signed or authored a commit in the last 2 years.
> >
> > I got ~250 entries. That's about 1/4 of al
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:09:25PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 15:25 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:05:16PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> []
> > > I still think the concept is pretty useless and it's
> > > just a duplication of "M:", which isn't an
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 15:25 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:05:16PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > I still think the concept is pretty useless and it's
> > just a duplication of "M:", which isn't anything other
> > than a list of who should be sent patches.
[]
> It wil
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:05:16PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 14:52 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 02:01:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 13:41 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> []
> > > > scripts: Teach get_maintainer.pl a
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 14:52 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 02:01:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 13:41 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[]
> > > scripts: Teach get_maintainer.pl about the new "R:" tag
>
> [ . . . ]
>
> > Paul, I already sent you a
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 02:01:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 13:41 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:06:24AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 10:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:42:03PM -0700,
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 13:41 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:06:24AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 10:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:42:03PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > MAINTAINERS | 8
> > > > 1
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:06:24AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 10:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:42:03PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > MAINTAINERS | 8
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 10:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:42:03PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > MAINTAINERS | 8
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 1814075c0e74..92f2bf91eec1 100644
> > --- a/MAINT
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:42:03PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> MAINTAINERS | 8
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1814075c0e74..92f2bf91eec1 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -7405,6 +7405,9 @@ F: kernel/rcu/t
From: "Paul E. McKenney"
Adding Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, and Lai Jiangshan as designated
RCU reviewers based on recent emails:
o https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/578 (Steven)
o https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/621 (Mathieu)
o https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/3/897 (Lai)
Sign
19 matches
Mail list logo
