Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 06:20:27PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Hi, >

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 06:20:27PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Hi, >

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > >

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:35:25AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > >

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:34:53PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:34:53PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > > > This is all I get

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > > > This is all I get

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > > > This is all I get

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > > > This is all I get

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > > > This is all I get

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > > > This is all I get

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > This is all I get from the bootloader on omap3: > > Starting kernel ... > > data abort > pc :

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > This is all I get from the bootloader on omap3: > > Starting kernel ... > > data abort > pc :

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

Allwinner devices are OK, Exynos devices (except 4210) are OK. -- Original -- From: "Tony Lindgren"; Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2018 11:37 PM To: "陈华才"; Cc: "Andrew Morton"; "Fabio

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

Allwinner devices are OK, Exynos devices (except 4210) are OK. -- Original -- From: "Tony Lindgren"; Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2018 11:37 PM To: "陈华才"; Cc: "Andrew Morton"; "Fabio Estevam"; "Stephen Rothwell"; "Rich Felker"; "Russell King"; "Yoshinori Sato";

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

* 陈华才 [180326 06:59]: > Hi, Tony and Fabio, > > Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't > understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken. Well the kernel I'm testing is just current Linux next cross compiled omap2plus_defconfig

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

* 陈华才 [180326 06:59]: > Hi, Tony and Fabio, > > Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't > understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken. Well the kernel I'm testing is just current Linux next cross compiled omap2plus_defconfig kernel. I do have

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

Hi, Tony and Fabio, Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken. Huacai -- Original -- From: "Andrew Morton"; Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2018 03:15 AM

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

Hi, Tony and Fabio, Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken. Huacai -- Original -- From: "Andrew Morton"; Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2018 03:15 AM To: "Fabio Estevam"; Cc:

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

Hi Andrew, On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:15:30 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:45:27 -0300 Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Looks like

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

Hi Andrew, On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:15:30 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:45:27 -0300 Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > > compressed

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:45:27 -0300 Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > Yes,

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:45:27 -0300 Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > Yes, almost all imx are broken in linux-next due

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. Yes, almost all imx are broken in linux-next due to this commit:

Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. Yes, almost all imx are broken in linux-next due to this commit:

Regression with arm in next with stack protector

Hi, Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. This is all I get from the bootloader on omap3: Starting kernel ... data abort pc : [<810002d0>] lr : [<100110a8>] reloc pc : [<9d6002d0>]lr : [<2c6110a8>] sp :

Regression with arm in next with stack protector

Hi, Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. This is all I get from the bootloader on omap3: Starting kernel ... data abort pc : [<810002d0>] lr : [<100110a8>] reloc pc : [<9d6002d0>]lr : [<2c6110a8>] sp :