Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Capable Of Corrupting Your FS/data * Use PCI DMA by default in IDE is unsafe (must not do so on via VPx, x 3) (requires chipset tuning to be enabled according to Andre Hedrick --- we need to turn this on by default -- TYT)

Re: [BUG] threaded processes get stuck in rt_sigsuspend/fillonedir/exit_notify

2000-09-13 Thread David Ford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 07:28:22 -0700 From: David Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, how about backing out the threads change until somebody is ready to fix everything involved. I haven't the time, depth of knowledge, or rep for this. At present the only

Re: 2.4.0-test8 and ssh (OpenSSH_2.1.1): error: socket: Address family not supported by protocol

2000-09-13 Thread Christophe Broult
You are right the problem seems to be related to ssh. Thank you, Chris "Gregory T. Norris" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It looks like this one's a ssh issue. If you haven't already gotten it resolved, take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/71307... there's a patch which should take care of

Re: [BUG] threaded processes get stuck in rt_sigsuspend/fillonedir/exit_notify

2000-09-13 Thread Ulrich Drepper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I didn't realize things had changed that broke the old threading model. Did Linus do more than add support for the new thread groups? I didn't think any that had changed that would break the old LinuxThread programs. First he introduces CLONE_THREAD (or how it was

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread David Ford
Andre Hedrick wrote: 4. Boot Time Failures * Use PCI DMA 'lost interrupt' problem with some hw [which ?] (NEC Versa LX with PIIX tuning) If this is a rare version of the BX/LX that has a no fix errata, then it will be messy to issue resets to get out of the loop. *

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks, How can I submit a bug report to be added to this list? Regards Harri - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 11:37:57PM -0700, David Ford wrote: 4. Boot Time Failures * Use PCI DMA 'lost interrupt' problem with some hw [which ?] (NEC Versa LX with PIIX tuning) If this is a rare version of the BX/LX that has a no fix errata, then it will be messy to

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread David Ford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 8. Fix Exists But Isnt Merged Please add 'Quota support causes OOPS' Someone posted a patch but I don't have the reference offhand. That patch appears to have fixed one person's problems. 9. To Do * PIIXn tuning can hang laptop (2.4.0-test8-pre6, David Ford)

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 11:55:55PM -0700, David Ford wrote: * Possible ppp problem (fail to connect; may be user error; reported by Matt Spong; claims worked on 2.3.40) I use ppp frequently w/ current kernels, works fine. Most likely an user error, yes, for 2.4.0 the latest

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 01:56:39AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 8. Fix Exists But Isnt Merged ... 9. To Do * Mount of new fs over existing mointpoint should return an error unless forced (Andrew McNabb, Alan Cox) Probably this belongs under 8. I posted a patch a few days

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread Torben Mathiasen
On Wed, Sep 13 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * TLAN nic appears to be adding a timer twice (2.4.0test8pre6, Arjan ve de Ven) This has been fixed, just not sent off to Linus yet. -- Torben Mathiasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux ThunderLAN maintainer http://tlan.kernel.dk - To

sb driver oops in 2.4.0-test8

2000-09-13 Thread Joachim Achtzehnter
Didn't have this problem with 2.4.0-test2, but after upgrading from test2 to test8 the sb driver encounters this error: Sep 12 20:49:52 wizard kernel: SB 3.01 detected OK (220) Sep 12 20:49:52 wizard kernel: SB DSP version is just 3.01 which means that your card is

RE: Linux 2.2.18pre6

2000-09-13 Thread Jorge Boncompte \(DTI2\)
- Mensaje original - De: "Alan Cox" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado: martes, 12 de septiembre de 2000 17:38 Asunto: Linux 2.2.18pre6 o Fix rtc race between timer and rtc irq (Andrea Arcangeli) o Fix slow gettimeofday SMP race (Andrea Arcangeli) o Check lost_ticks in

UDMA100 Linux 2.2.*

2000-09-13 Thread Mason, Christopher (Paging) Engineering
Hi, Do not know if this is the right place to be asking this, but I thought it is worth a try to start with. Does anyone know if the High-Point HT370 UDMA100 controller is supported under the current 2.2.x Linux Kernel? Basically just bought an UDMA100 IBM hd, with an ABit BE6-II-100 m/board

[PATCH] thinko in 2.2.17 task file code

2000-09-13 Thread willy tarreau
Hi Andre, I remember you were very tired when you wrote this code. There's a little thinko in it, I believe : int tasksize = (HDIO_DRIVE_TASK) ? HDIO_DRIVE_TASK_HDR_SIZE : HDIO_DRIVE_CMD_HDR_SIZE; should be : int tasksize = (cmd==HDIO_DRIVE_TASK) ? HDIO_DRIVE_TASK_HDR_SIZE :

Re: Booting into /bin/bash

2000-09-13 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
According to Ion Badulescu: This still doesn't solve the original problem, i.e. init (or whatever you pass as init) still doesn't get a controlling tty from the kernel. And for *good* reason. However, since init appears to be safe from these issues, it it fairly trivial to fix this in the

Re: Booting into /bin/bash

2000-09-13 Thread Ion Badulescu
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: Don't patch the kernel. If init gets the controlling tty, and you press ^C - SIGINT gets sent to init - init interprets this as ctrl-alt-del ! Yes, choosing SIGINT as the signal sent to init on ctrl-alt-del was probably not very bright (and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Darkstar Development Project

2000-09-13 Thread Jamie Lokier
Ralf Baechle wrote: From some random Linux source tree's .hdepend: /usr/people/ralf/src/linux/linux/include/asm/sn/sn0/ip27.h: \ /usr/people/ralf/src/linux/linux/include/asm/mipsregs.h \ /usr/people/ralf/src/linux/linux/include/asm/sn/addrs.h @touch

Re: Test 8 Kernel Unable to get the password prompt?

2000-09-13 Thread Helge Hafting
Steven Walter wrote: If you're logging in as root, this is probably a result of the VT not being named in /etc/securetty. Devfsd mucks up the names, so you can either include "1," which would allow root logins from pseudo-terminals and other insecure places, or upgrade your util-linux to a

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Alexander Viro
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Daniel Quinlan wrote: Good patches are sent to the linux-kernel mailing list which is also where additional discussion about these patches can take place. All patches (good and bad) will be logged and there will be a web interface to access the patch

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Alexander S A Kjeldaas
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 02:15:58AM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote: Required tags: "Version" - the base kernel version. For example, "2.4.0-test8-pre1". The web page will list valid version strings. "Description" - a detailed description of the patch.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Darkstar Development Project

2000-09-13 Thread Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Jamie Lokier writes: .cvsignore Not so fast. Read your .hdepend file, notice which files that it's touching, and then notice that those are real source files (include/linux/*.h and include/asm/*.h). Michael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread Martin Diehl
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, David Ford wrote: Please add 'Quota support causes OOPS' Someone posted a patch but I don't have the reference offhand. That patch appears to have fixed one person's problems. [..] * Oops in dquot_transfer (David Ford, Martin Diehl) (Jan Kara has a

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Alexander Viro writes: Sigh... You know, some stuff is security-sensitive. Dunno about other folks, but in such situations I prefer to send the patches OOB to relevant maintainers. And they often go through several rewrites before they go into the tree. Having descriptions of _all_ pending

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Darkstar Development Project

2000-09-13 Thread Jamie Lokier
Jamie Lokier wrote: @touch /usr/people/ralf/src/linux/linux/include/asm/sn/sn0/arch.h [...] .cvsignore Oops, ignore me 'cos I obviously didn't read what I replied to. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: files bigger than 2 GB

2000-09-13 Thread Matti Aarnio
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:09:03PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: On 12 Sep 00 at 19:02, Matti Aarnio wrote: ReiserFS: Propably works EXT2: works Coda: Not (local cache issues, protocol is ok.) UFS: works (although not complete vs. O_LARGEFILE flag use.)

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Mitchell Blank Jr
Daniel Quinlan wrote: "Version" - the base kernel version. For example, "2.4.0-test8-pre1". The web page will list valid version strings. Ideally this should be overridable for patches marked experimental, since they might be to some modified kernel. Of course you

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread Torben Mathiasen
On Wed, Sep 13 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Loading the qlogicfc driver in 2.4.0-test8 causes the kernel to loop forver reporting SCSI disks that aren't present (Paul Hubbard) This is probaly due to the module_init/exit stuff that got into test8. I have already sent

Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee

2000-09-13 Thread Trond Myklebust
" " == Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 09:10:56PM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote: Making mtime a true 64-bit cookie on Linux servers would be a solution that works on all clients. Making mtime 64bit would also be useful for local parallel

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 02:15:58AM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote: Proposal: 1. Developers submit all Linux kernel patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not in place yet, so don't start sending patches). @vger.kernel.org 2. Each patch will conform to a standardized, but simple, text format,

Re: [RFC] Wine speedup through kernel module

2000-09-13 Thread David Howells
David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The code I posted yesterday is a bit of an abuse of the personality mechanism, but ought to work nonetheless. Didn't you like it? I didn't know how to get hold of a "struct pt_regs*" till someone sent me a message this morning (it was obvious really).

[OOPS] FB: 2.4.0-test8 with Riel's vm and sched pathes

2000-09-13 Thread Edward C. Lang
Hi, Got this Oops today, after X had crashed nicely. Attempted to use gpm on console, and wham. This is using the VESA framebuffer driver on a S3 Savage4 w/ 8M. ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test8. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default)

Re: [RFC] Wine speedup through kernel module

2000-09-13 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I didn't know how to get hold of a "struct pt_regs*" till someone sent me a message this morning Ah. I didn't realise you wanted the struct pt_regs for any purpose other than to pass to the lcall7 handler - and I was no longer using the lcall7 handler in the

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-13 Thread Alan Cox
Yes, but "how hard is it reasonable for the kernel to try" is based on both items. A good first order approximation is number of requests. I must strongly disagree with that claim. A request could be 512 bytes or 128K. It's still a queue - the queue of things we're going to take on this

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4

2000-09-13 Thread Alan Cox
They exist in the same way. You update stuff in controlled careful steps and you change troublesome drivers very early in a patch release - eg never touching tulip except early on So it could be in 2.2.19? Anything interested parties could/should do to help? Im still hoping to get it

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4

2000-09-13 Thread Alan Cox
Think Alan has made that clear. The way I read things the nfsv2 stuff needs to be split out, into sets of small independent patches. This lets Alan audit and control any bad patches easily. The nfsv3 changes should not We've taken that as far as we can already - To unsubscribe from this

Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee

2000-09-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:42:15PM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote: " " == Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 09:10:56PM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote: Making mtime a true 64-bit cookie on Linux servers would be a solution that works on all

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread Alan Cox
* PIIXn tuning can hang laptop (2.4.0-test8-pre6, David Ford) Need more details of how APM/ACPI is dorking with DMA settins by the OEM. Case 1 I've seen is assuming windows put the drive back into PIO no multimode before letting the bios suspend (for suspend to disk) Case 2 I've seen

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Kurt Garloff
Hi Dan, nice proposal. One comment: On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 02:15:58AM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote: Linus wants the body of patches to be in text format and not MIME-encoded or uuencoded. [...] Future features? - PGP signing of patches - conversion of uuencoded patches to text

locking in 2.4.0-prex (was [NFS] lockdsvc: Invalid argument)

2000-09-13 Thread Trond Myklebust
" " == Aaron T Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hey -- I'm running 2.4.0-test6, using knfsd serving a few Solaris systems. When they try to write, I'm getting "Err#91 ERESTART" which points to lockd. Trying to restart gives lockdsvc: Invalid argument, which Trond

Re: does anyone have a minimal opendir/readdir/closedir implementation?

2000-09-13 Thread Jamie Lokier
Felix von Leitner wrote: The kernel interface seems to be: * supply an O_DIRECTORY flag to open() O_DIRECTORY means "refuse to open if not a directory". Old kernels ignore the flag. So Glibc then calls fstat() to check it's really a directory. (opendir() is required to fail on

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Alexander Viro
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Also the requires stuff isnt going to be easy because you can't tell who beat you to a patch and your patch _might_ still apply with wrong results so that can't be totally automated either. nods BTW, any bug reports starting with "kernel is x.y.z +

Patches

2000-09-13 Thread Mason, Christopher (Paging) Engineering
How can I find out if the following patch, ide.2.2.16.2630.patch.bz2 is in the 2.2.17 kernel? It is the HighPoint Technologies UDMA100 controller patch. Thanks in advance -- Vodafone Paging Limited Registered Office: The Courtyard, 2-4 London Road, Newbury, Berks RG14 1JX Registered in

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4

2000-09-13 Thread Chip Salzenberg
According to Mike Castle: On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 07:57:38PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: So basically the situation is that people prefer to switch the whole OS as opposed to applying a kernel patch? Or multiple kernel patches. NFS. RAID. IDE. Bigmem. LVM. LFS. Rawio. Serial.

[PATCH][RFC] Add RUNTIME_FXSR to M686 defines

2000-09-13 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
This quick patch adds CONFIG_RUNTIME_FXSR=y to M686 defines. FXSR support will be always compiled in and used only when available (late PII/C). I see no disadvantages (maybe slightly bigger bzImage). Patch is against 2.4.0-test8. Compiled/tested on Celeron Mendocino. FXSR support is detected

Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee

2000-09-13 Thread Trond Myklebust
" " == Jamie Lokier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If we're getting serious about adding finer-grained mtimes to ext2, could we please consider using those bits as a way to know, for sure, whether a file has changed? Agreed. Btw, the whole cache coherency thing would

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Mitchell Blank Jr
Alan Cox wrote: Humans will generally get a weird report from sending Linus a message wonder what all this field stuff is and mail someone else instead. If they're able to create a patch, hopefully they'd be able to fill in a simple email template (and I've seen some pretty dim folks manage

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Mitchell Blank Jr
Alexander Viro wrote: BTW, any bug reports starting with "kernel is x.y.z + FOO42069 + K314 + long list of patches" will be cheerfully flushed down the toilet here, no matter what system of dependencies is going to be in place. Yes, for the stuff discussed on lkml patch dependencies should be

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-13 Thread James Sutherland
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Mitchell Blank Jr wrote: Alan Cox wrote: Yes, but "how hard is it reasonable for the kernel to try" is based on both items. A good first order approximation is number of requests. I must strongly disagree with that claim. A request could be 512 bytes or 128K.

kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711!

2000-09-13 Thread Eloy A. Paris
Hi! I got an Oops with 2.4.0test8. The message written to syslog said: Sep 13 02:51:49 antenas kernel: kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711! This machine has 128MBytes of memory and at the time of the Opps I was running Netscape and a big find was running in the background as well (Debian's daily

RE: Patches

2000-09-13 Thread Mason, Christopher (Paging) Engineering
-Original Message- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 September 2000 14:15 To: Mason, Christopher (Paging) Engineering Subject: Re: Patches On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Mason, Christopher (Paging) Engineering wrote: How can I find out if the following patch,

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Alexander Viro
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Mitchell Blank Jr wrote: Alexander Viro wrote: BTW, any bug reports starting with "kernel is x.y.z + FOO42069 + K314 + long list of patches" will be cheerfully flushed down the toilet here, no matter what system of dependencies is going to be in place. Yes, for

Re: Booting into /bin/bash

2000-09-13 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
According to Richard B. Johnson: Without patching the kernel, I think I can show that there is something basically wrong. The patch may just hide the problem. No. Something seems to be wrong, even with using the first virtual terminal, which is a 'tty' and should (must) be able to become a

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-13 Thread Mitchell Blank Jr
James Sutherland wrote: In terms of latency, I'd suggest we aim to keep the device in use all the time we have outstanding requests: every time the device is ready to accept a request, we feed it the "next" one in the queue; until it is free again, requests pile up in the queue, being sorted,

Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-13 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: You could use number-of-sectors, but that can't distinguish between random access and sequential access. We actually use the number of `buffer headers` that enters the ll_rw_block layer. (if all the fses have 4k blocksize it become the number of

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-13 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Yes, but "how hard is it reasonable for the kernel to try" is based on both items. A good first order approximation is number of requests. I must strongly disagree with that claim. A request could be 512 bytes or 128K. Current elevator account the

RE: Patches

2000-09-13 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Mason, Christopher (Paging) Engineering wrote: [...about HPT370 and ide patches...] If I wanted to install, say for example RedHat 6.2 onto a machine with just 1 UDMA100 HD, would I have to go and patch the setup disks so they could see the HD to install onto? As *I

reexporting a removable media through NFS

2000-09-13 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Hi! How can I reexport a mount point through NFS without causing too much surprise to the users? The mount point contains a removable media which can be removed anytime since it is not locked and the gui user can work the same way as in front of a Windows machine. The system is Red Hat

[PATCH] ACPI interpreter makefile fix

2000-09-13 Thread Andrey Panin
Hi all, I recently returned from Sea Launch homeport and already made a new patch :)) This patch fixes bothering problem with ACPI interpreter Makefile. Without this patch ACPI interpreter will unconditionaly recompiled every kernel build. Hope it will be usefull. Best wishes,

Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee

2000-09-13 Thread Trond Myklebust
" " == Jeff Epler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 02:53:02PM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote: No. Things fall in and out of the inode cache all the time. That's a vicious circle that's going to lead to a lot of unnecessary traffic. The traffic is

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-13 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Martin Dalecki wrote: Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Martin Dalecki wrote: First of all: In the case of the mp3 player and such there is already a fine proper way to give it better chances on getting it's job done smooth - RT kernel sceduler priorities

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 01:56:39AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: 9. To Do * Check all devices use resources properly (Everyone now has to use request_region and check the return since we no longer single thread driver inits in all module cases. Also memory regions

Re: oops

2000-09-13 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 19:46:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] I got this OOPS error. Ksymoops output is listed below. It occured when I was starting named and gave the message the error occured in 'chgrp'. FYI: most people will probably not look

Re: Booting into /bin/bash

2000-09-13 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: According to Richard B. Johnson: Without patching the kernel, I think I can show that there is something basically wrong. The patch may just hide the problem. No. Try it. Something seems to be wrong, even with using the first

RE: configuring from kernel source directory

2000-09-13 Thread Mason, Christopher (Paging) Engineering
You tried doing a make clean make mrproper first in the /usr/src/2.2.5_New before doing make xconfig. I think I had this problem before. -Original Message- From: Tan Chee Wei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 September 2000 15:27 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: configuring from

Re: elevator code

2000-09-13 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Martin Dalecki wrote: "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: lessons learned in live customer accounts. In NetWare, requests are merged at A) the boundry between the File Cache and the I/O subsystem, and B) in the drivers themselves and NOT THE ELEVATOR. Yes that's the proper place

Re: elevator code

2000-09-13 Thread Hans Reiser
If I understand your elevator algorithm, you switch between two queues, filling one queue while removing from another queue. If you modify this to only be invoked when starvation of is detected, that is, to only prevent filling the removing queue when the oldest unsatisfied request exceeds

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Eli Carter
Mitchell Blank Jr wrote: Daniel Quinlan wrote: "Version" - the base kernel version. For example, "2.4.0-test8-pre1". The web page will list valid version strings. Ideally this should be overridable for patches marked experimental, since they might be to some

(reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 (summary of elevator ideas)

2000-09-13 Thread Hans Reiser
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: One important point on remirroring I did not mention in my post. In NetWare, remirroring scans the disk BACKWARDS (n0) to prevent artificial starvation while remirring is going on. This was another optimization we learned the hard way by trying numerous

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread Alan Cox
Like any tracking system, the suceess or failure of its rollout depends completely on whether Linus et al will be steadfast enough to refuse to look at any patch that hasn't gone through the system. If that attitude is taken the large numbers of patches will never make 2.4 proper. Alan - To

Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4)

2000-09-13 Thread Alan Cox
[1] I understand the RAID issue with disk format compatibility, which makes the current RAID patch unacceptable for official 2.2 usage. I just wish somebody would *solve* that issue.[2] [2] Having complained about a problem, have I just volunteered myself to solve it? (HHOS)

RE: configuring from kernel source directory

2000-09-13 Thread Tan Chee Wei
hallo , Thanks for the quick reply ! However, after make clean make mrproper have been done, the same error message: [root@edge1 linux-2.2]# make xconfig rm -f include/asm rm: include/asm: is a directory make: *** [symlinks] Error 1 appears There is also an error message from make

usb-uhci forgets to destroy kmem entries

2000-09-13 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! I do not know, if anybody really uses this driver ('UHCI (Intel PIIX4, VIA, ...) support'), but based one the name, I choosen it, and found, that when it cannot find any USB host, it forgots to do kmem_destroy_..., and because of that any subsequent attempts to load usb-uhci

[PATCH] wrong SNAT behaviour in kernels 2.2.X

2000-09-13 Thread willy tarreau
Hi Alexey, I recently came across a rather strange thing using source NAT with ip rule : if the packets to be translated are matched ONLY by fwmark, and no from prefix is specified, the resulting address will be the original one ORed with the new desired one. This is because the srcmask field is

Re: Fixed addresses for various architectures

2000-09-13 Thread Eli Carter
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote: I would like to have suggestions for a fixed memory address into which a large object can (usually) be mmap(MAP_FIXED)'d safely on various architectures. On i386 I'm using 0x6000, which is (by and large) safely out of the way of libraries (grow up from

RE: configuring from kernel source directory

2000-09-13 Thread Mason, Christopher (Paging) Engineering
It is probably down to when you do cp -Rr x x, you are not copying the symlinks or something, no doubt someone here will know what the problem is. I usually find when I copy things with symlinks in I usually tar it up, using tar -zcvf x.tar.gz *, then untar it at the required location,

Re: elevator code

2000-09-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 04:29:18PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: About B) I can' believe you seriously want to duplicate the merging code in each lowlevel driver given most of them could share the same code (as they're doing in linux). I guess it would just be a library call. e.g. the BSDs

Re: configuring from kernel source directory

2000-09-13 Thread Eli Carter
Tan Chee Wei wrote: hallo , To back up a linux source directory, I tried a $ cp -Rr /usr/src/linux2.2.5 /usr/src/2.2.5_New and then I made the soft link to point to the new directory. My question is why does 'make xconfig' or any 'make config' in the new directory does not work ,even

Re: elevator code

2000-09-13 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Andi Kleen wrote: function that is called from the drivers as needed. For smart devices with very intelligent firmware you simply do not call it (assuming you have decently sized kiovec requests, with the current bh approach some premerging is probably always needed) I

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-13 Thread James Sutherland
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Mitchell Blank Jr wrote: James Sutherland wrote: In terms of latency, I'd suggest we aim to keep the device in use all the time we have outstanding requests: every time the device is ready to accept a request, we feed it the "next" one in the queue; until it is free

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-13 Thread James Sutherland
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Mitchell Blank Jr wrote: The "large queue" goes against the whole point of this exercise - that is that if there are many items in the "queue" being sorted then unlucky requests can end up waiting a long time to get

RE: usb-uhci forgets to destroy kmem entries

2000-09-13 Thread Dunlap, Randy
Yes, people use it. Thanks. ~Randy ___ |Randy Dunlap Intel Corp., DALSr. SW Engr.| |randy.dunlap.at.intel.com503-696-2055| |NOTE: Any views presented here are mine alone | |and may not represent the views of my employer. |

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread tytso
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:29:04 +0100 (BST) From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] Like any tracking system, the suceess or failure of its rollout depends completely on whether Linus et al will be steadfast enough to refuse to look at any patch that hasn't gone through the system.

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-13 Thread Michael T. Babcock
- Original Message - From: "Rik van Riel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: Uhmmm, isn't the elevator about request /latency/ ? Yes, but definitely not absolute "time" latency. So what do you think about

Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-13 Thread willy tarreau
Hi ! This is a very interesting idea, but I think we will quickly need two more types of information from the patch sender : - type of patch (fix, new feature, performance boost, cleanup ...) - the degree of reliability known to the sender : - some patches are hand-coded (often proposals

(reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 (summary of elevator ideas)

2000-09-13 Thread Rogier Wolff
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: One important point on remirroring I did not mention in my post. In NetWare, remirroring scans the disk BACKWARDS (n0) to prevent artificial starvation while remirring is going on. This was another optimization we learned the hard way by trying numerous

Re: elevator code

2000-09-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 04:59:22PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Andi Kleen wrote: function that is called from the drivers as needed. For smart devices with very intelligent firmware you simply do not call it (assuming you have decently sized kiovec requests, with the

Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee

2000-09-13 Thread Theodore Y. Ts'o
Date:Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:54:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Trond Myklebust [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't forget that 2^20 10^6, hence if you really want units of microseconds, you actually only need to save 3 bytes worth of data per timestamp. For the purposes of NFS, however the

Re: elevator code

2000-09-13 Thread Martin Dalecki
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Martin Dalecki wrote: "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: lessons learned in live customer accounts. In NetWare, requests are merged at A) the boundry between the File Cache and the I/O subsystem, and B) in the drivers themselves and NOT THE

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 (summary of elevator ideas)

2000-09-13 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
You're welcome. :-) Jeff Hans Reiser wrote: "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: One important point on remirroring I did not mention in my post. In NetWare, remirroring scans the disk BACKWARDS (n0) to prevent artificial starvation while remirring is going on. This was another

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-13 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: * PIIXn tuning can hang laptop (2.4.0-test8-pre6, David Ford) Need more details of how APM/ACPI is dorking with DMA settins by the OEM. Case 1 I've seen is assuming windows put the drive back into PIO no multimode before letting the bios

PowerPC Linux for AS/400 RS/6000 Hardware

2000-09-13 Thread dwayne
Linus, Cort Dougan recently announced he was no longer going to be maintaining the PowerPC Linux tree. There is a team within IBM actively working on PowerPC Linux for both 32-bit and 64-bit hardware and we are very interested in continuing the development of PowerPC Linux. We have been

SCSI scan problem in 2.4test8

2000-09-13 Thread Matthew Kirkwood
Hi, 2.4 seems to have problems scanning SCSI busses. It looks rather like it is scanning the first bus for every host that it finds. My dmesg is attached. In my dual-P3 box, I have three disks on the first channel of an on-board aic7xxx: $ cat /proc/scsi/scsi Attached devices: Host: scsi0

Re: Adaptec RAID driver?

2000-09-13 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: I was asked a question: Is there a driver for the Adaptec Array 1000U2 No and if this is the Adaptec IDE raid the feedback I've had has been pretty negative on getting open source drivers. Having said that Adaptec have opensourced their driver for some

Re: SCSI scan problem in 2.4test8

2000-09-13 Thread Matthew Kirkwood
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Torben Mathiasen wrote: 2.4 seems to have problems scanning SCSI busses. Could you try out this patch. The module_init/exit stuff in sd.c has given some people a real headache. I don't have sd modularised. Will it make any difference? MAtthew. - To unsubscribe from

Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4)

2000-09-13 Thread Matthew Kirkwood
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: [1] I understand the RAID issue with disk format compatibility, which makes the current RAID patch unacceptable for official 2.2 usage. I just wish somebody would *solve* that issue.[2] Solve that and the tool back compatibility problem for

Re: configuring from kernel source directory

2000-09-13 Thread Michael Elizabeth Chastain
and then I made the soft link to point to the new directory. If you are talking about a soft link named "linux", just completely delete it and reset it to the value that it had when you installed your distribution and then never touch it again. rm: include/asm: is a directory Instead of "cp

Kernel threads questions

2000-09-13 Thread Jaime Medrano
I have a lot of doubts about kernel threads. I have read somewhere that in a kernel thread the stack can't be used because there is no copy-on-write. I want also to know if I can make any syscall from a kernel thread. When I call kernel_thread, the process is cloned whith the CLONE_VM flag set.

Re: why ip_masq modules?

2000-09-13 Thread Martin Maciaszek
Thanks for the quick response :)) Regards Martin On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 06:09:23PM +0200, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:09:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Igmar Palsenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Martin Maciaszek [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: why ip_masq

[patchlet] Minor cleanup in mm/swapfile.c (2.4.0t8)

2000-09-13 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. This patch does minor and strightforward cleanup in mm/swapfile.c. --- linux-240test8-clean/mm/swapfile.c Thu Aug 10 16:29:54 2000 +++ linux/mm/swapfile.c Wed Sep 13 20:40:15 2000 @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ while (1) { p = swap_info[type]; - if ((p-flags

  1   2   3   4   5   >