On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 01:37:36AM +0100, Guest section DW wrote:
>
> I see lots of messages from you about corruption in 2.4.0-test11
> but we all know very well that 2.4.0-test11 corrupts things
> and further evidence is not necessary.
> Hopefully all, or at least the most significant, problems
At 03:16 11/12/2000, Ion Badulescu wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
>Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > > My card is an Ether Express Pro 100, lcpci says: Intel Corporation 82557
> > > [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 04)
>
>So it's an i82558 A-step. That's interesting, the patch shouldn't h
Hi Ryan,
> This is notice that the do_try_to_free_pages bug is still present in the
> latest 2.2 kernel, 2.2.18pre27.
>
> VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kjournald...
> VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kjournald...
> VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kjournald...
>
> The error also occur
Hi
I've had some very peculiar problems with 2.4.0-test12-pre8
In particular I can't start linux in single user mode, it goes to level
5 when trying to init 1.
There is also a problem building fs/smbfs/inode.c at line 166
Is there a fix or have I got something really screwed up?
--
Regards
Right Thanks. I did not realize I was not in text mode.
I have somehow fixed the problem by doing something to the apm-bios
settings. I disabled a bunch of stuff in the bios and the thing is working
apparently ok now. Don't ask me what cause I really don't know. It's just
working now.
Thanks, an
Yeah I just read that. Thanks for the info. Knew nothing about it being
kicked out there. I usually only read looking for package locations of
needed software to run the kernels. Now it looks like I should be reading
more. Thanks for the blow to the head to get me thinking right again. :)
BTW, I
Well, I just had a Signal 11 even with the patch. What can I do to help
figure this out?
Thanks,
--Rainer
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 11:07 PM
To: David Woodhouse
Cc: Andi Kleen; Rainer Mager; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mark Vojk
Hello,
> There is also a problem building fs/smbfs/inode.c at line 166
>
> Is there a fix or have I got something really screwed up?
If you are referring to 'next' is not a member of the structure? If so, known issue.
Regards,
-Frank
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib
i'm compiling kernel 2.4.0-test11 uder RH7. i've changed the CC= line to use
kgcc, executed "make clean" and "make mrproper". "make menuconfig" and "make
dep" went smoothly. however during the "make modules" process, several
warning messages (shown below) appeared:
{standard input}: Assembler mes
Alan,
I was trying to re-install my VMware with the latest 2.2.18 kernel.
It failed to try to re-compile the modules.
What is the location of the directory of C header files that match your
running kernel? [/usr/src/linux/include]
The directory of kernel headers (version 2.
did we lose ip=autoconf. I see dhcp and arp transmitting infinitely. I was
able to boot only after completely entering nfsroot= and ip= boot commands.
2.2.17 worked thusley.
root=/dev/nfs ether=0,0,eth0
2.2.18-pre26 works only
root=/dev/nfs
nfsroot=192.168.50.11:/tftpboot/191.168.50.2,rsize=81
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:15:53 +0800,
"Corisen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i'm compiling kernel 2.4.0-test11 uder RH7. i've changed the CC= line to use
>kgcc, executed "make clean" and "make mrproper". "make menuconfig" and "make
>dep" went smoothly. however during the "make modules" process, seve
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> More fixes. Ignore previous.
diff -urw linux-2.4.0-test12.old/drivers/atm/ambassador.c
linux-2.4.0-test12/drivers/atm/ambassador.c
--- linux-2.4.0-test12.old/drivers/atm/ambassador.c Fri Jul 7 00:37:24 2000
+++ linux-2.4.0-test12/drivers/at
Hi,
which functions DON'T need inline documentation in the kernel?
Thanks,
Jani.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.t
Steven Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 06:20:31PM +, David Wragg wrote:
> > If I understood why the MTRR driver was doing something on the K6-2,
> > then model-specific differences might make some sense. But currently,
> > I don't see why there would be any differ
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> > - this comment from include/linux/fs.h should be deleted
> > #define NR_RESERVED_FILES 10 /* reserved for root */
> well, not really -- it is "reserved" right now too, it is just root is
> allowed
> did we lose ip=autoconf. I see dhcp and arp transmitting infinitely. I was
> able to boot only after completely entering nfsroot= and ip= boot commands.
>
> 2.2.17 worked thusley.
:
I didn't try with 2.2.18 yet but looking at the source (ipconfig.c)
seem that my patch wasn't accepted, you can
Hi!
Rule Set Based Access Control (RSBAC) for Linux version 1.1.0 has been released.
Information and downloads are available from
http://www.rsbac.org
Amon Ott.
--
Name: rsbac
Version: 1.1.0
Kernelver: 2.2.17, 2.4.0-test10,11
Status:9 (UP), 7 (SMP)
Hi Keith,
Thanks for your reply. The below mentioned warning messages where displayed
while using modutils 2.3.22. Guess I need to apply the patch you mentioned
to removed all the anonying messages.
As I've not applied any patch before, pls advise where should I download the
patch and the instru
I'm posting this again hoping that it'll get incorporated into the kernel.
I've tested the patch against 2.4.0-test12-pre8, and it's working fine.
Thanks,
Jeff
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
- Original Message -
From: "Werner Almesberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PR
I'm posting this again hoping that it'll get incorporated into the kernel.
I've tested the patch against 2.4.0-test12-pre8, and it's working fine.
Thanks,
Jeff
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
- Original Message -
From: "Werner Almesberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PR
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:05:42 +0800,
"Corisen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks for your reply. The below mentioned warning messages where displayed
>while using modutils 2.3.22. Guess I need to apply the patch you mentioned
>to removed all the anonying messages.
>
>As I've not applied any patch
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 01:37:36AM +0100, Guest section DW wrote:
> >
> > I see lots of messages from you about corruption in 2.4.0-test11
> > but we all know very well that 2.4.0-test11 corrupts things
> > and further evidence is not necessary.
Dietmar Kling wrote:
>
> Ok guys i take your arguments...
> (i really loved to hear them)
>
> and i'd like to continue them in a
> private discussion( but i am
> tired now ... :) )
>
> but a last one i cannot resist...
>
>
> but why are your ideas not widespread and
> so successful like kde,g
> root=/dev/nfs ip=both ether=0,0,eth0 gives this result
>
> Dec 10 22:50:52 Eddys dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:50:ba:05:7b:fb via eth0
> Dec 10 22:50:52 Eddys dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.50.2 to 00:50:ba:05:7b:fb
> via eth0
Those are DHCP. 'both' is the old keywords for rarp and bootp. It no
> which functions DON'T need inline documentation in the kernel?
A good guide initially is probably 'document those that are exported via
EXPORT_SYM() only'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read
Thinko.
Question is... Adam Richter posted a patch for i2o_lan.c that does
this...
static struct tq_struct i2o_post_buckets_task = {
list: LIST_HEAD_INIT(i2o_post_buckets_task.list),
sync: 0,
routine: (void (*)(void *))i2o_lan_receive_post,
data: (void *) 0
};
If
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Rainer Mager wrote:
> Well, I just had a Signal 11 even with the patch. What can I do to help
> figure this out?
Is init permanently running after you see a couple of these?
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:38:52 Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
> Please don't put KDE into the same bunch as gnome or
> windows. KDE is in fact *well designed*! In esp. 2.0
>
That is why you need a supercomputer to run KDE at acceptable interactive
speeds...
--
Juan Antonio Magallon Lacarta
> You could just tell people the truth. Something far worse that DANGEROUS.
> Like:
>
> CRIPPLED BY LEGAL DURESS
>
> Or as I come to understand:
>
> The processes that would normally have fixed this driver by now
> are broken by the vigorous defense of Microsoft's IP.
> It will trash your dis
Recently I had some thoughts on how to realise CPU attachment and
detachment in a running Linux system (based on the 2.4 kernel).
CPU attachment and detachment would make sense on an S/390 when there
are several Linuxes running, each in its own logical partition. This
way a CPU could be taken
Recently I had some thoughts on how to realise CPU attachment and
detachment in a running Linux system (based on the 2.4 kernel).
CPU attachment and detachment would make sense on an S/390 when there
are several Linuxes running, each in its own logical partition. This
way a CPU could be taken
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Rainer Mager wrote:
> Well, I just had a Signal 11 even with the patch. What can I do to help
> figure this out?
My troublesome box finally seems to be stable. It's been up for the
last two days whilst under quite heavy loads without problems.
Previously, it would be lucky t
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When running top, procinfo, or free I get 0 for Shared memory. Obviously
> this is incorrect. What has changed from the 2.2.x and the 2.4.x that
> would cause these apps to misreport this information.
Known 2.4 behaviour. It is simply to costly t
Hi,
This tiny patch extends ipchains logging. This way one can distinguish
(plain) connection attempts and (stealth) scans. E.g.
kernel: Packet log: input - lo PROTO=6 127.0.0.1:40326 127.0.0.1:80
L=40 S=0x00 I=5808 F=0x T=51 (#1)
vs.
L=40 S=0x00 I=5808 F=0x T=51 SYN ACK (#1)
and
L=40 S=0
Jeff Chua wrote:
> I'm posting this again hoping that it'll get incorporated into the kernel.
It's already in Alan's tree (e.g. patch-2.4.0test11-ac1.bz2) and should
find its way from there into Linus' tree soon (i.e. probably by test12).
- Werner
--
_
> sigp. To synchronize n CPUs one can create n kernel threads and give
> them a high priority to make sure they will be executed soon (e.g. by
> setting p->policy to SCHED_RR and p->rt_priority to a very high
> value). As soon as all CPUs are in synchronized state (with
> interrupts disabled) the
I am trying to modify a driver that worked great
on 2.2.16 to 2.4.0-x..
My old code was:
static struct wait_queue *roundrobin_wait;
static struct wait_queue *task_stop_wait; static struct
tq_struct roundrobin_task; static struct timer_list timeout_timer;
...
init_timer(&timeout_tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rik van Riel) writes:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [snip whine]
>
> > I've consistently re-produced this on my Dell Latitude CS laptop. I'm
> > wondering if this will reduce battery life since the CPU is constantly
> > being loaded instead of proper
hi,
I think you forgot some revert of the aaccraid patch, thing like that
:
#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_AACRAID
#include "aacraid/include/linit.h"
#endif
in drivers/scsci/hosts.c
make no sense.
revert patch attached
PS: even if it doen't change anything actually it may help when need
to apply the pat
Hi Martin
this patch makes computing of pci_resource_len a bit more
straightforward and hopefully still correct.Plus an aesthetic change in a
struct declaration :)
--- /usr/src/clean/linux/include/linux/pci.hMon Dec 11 16:49:19 2000
+++ pci.h Mon Dec 11 17:54:24 2000
@@ -432,8
Hello,
since test11, the NFS code uses the set_bit and related routines
to manipulate the wb_flags member of the nfs_page struct (nfs_page.h).
Unfortunately, wb_flags has still data type 'int'.
This is a problem (at least) on the 64-bit S/390 architecture,
as our ..._bit macros assume bit 0 is
> "Ulrich" == Ulrich Weigand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ulrich> Hello,
Ulrich> since test11, the NFS code uses the set_bit and related
Ulrich> routines to manipulate the wb_flags member of the nfs_page
Ulrich> struct (nfs_page.h). Unfortunately, wb_flags has still data
Ulrich> type 'int'.
> since test11, the NFS code uses the set_bit and related routines
> to manipulate the wb_flags member of the nfs_page struct (nfs_page.h).
> Unfortunately, wb_flags has still data type 'int'.
NFS is wrong. Rusty did a complete audit of the code and I've been feeding
some stuff to Linus. That one
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 08:26:46AM +0100, Dominik Kubla wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 03:50:16PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> >
> > Can you enable both at the same time? It's an installer issue with laptops
> > and I need tobe able to detect whatever is running.
> >
>
> IIRC you can choos
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Please don't put KDE into the same bunch as gnome or
> windows. KDE is in fact *well designed*! In esp. 2.0
'Tis funny, you know, because ISTR that the bloody thing
got the same problems with the program sizes, API bloat and lack of
orthogonality.
- Original Message -
From: J . A . Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin Dalecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit
>
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:38:52 Martin Dalecki wrote:
> >
> > Please do
Hello,
I tried this patch against test12-pre7, and all that I get is
"cs: socket c7604800 timed out during reset. Try increasing
setup_delay."
Performing cardctl reset yields the same message. I think that
cardctl reset takes away the possibility that increasing
setup_delay would actually he
Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
> > Please don't put KDE into the same bunch as gnome or
> > windows. KDE is in fact *well designed*! In esp. 2.0
>
> 'Tis funny, you know, because ISTR that the bloody thing
> got the same problems with the program sizes,
Heiko,
If I'm not mistaken, this sort of thing has been done by the beowulf folks.
Matthew D. Pitts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 9:03 AM
Subject: CPU attachent and detachment in a running Linux s
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> In each case, the task and the tools used are the same. The only
> difference was the kernel used. In both cases, 2.2.18 won by 3%.
> Its comparing apples to apples and oranges to oranges. Granted 3%
> isn't very much, but I would have guessed th
On 11 Dec 2000, John Fremlin wrote:
> Two points: [snipped]
Doing a 'make bzImage' is NOT VM-intensive. Using this as a test
for the VM doesn't make any sense since it doesn't really excercise
the VM in any way...
If you want to measure, or even just bitch about, the VM, you should
a
> Doing a 'make bzImage' is NOT VM-intensive. Using this as a test
> for the VM doesn't make any sense since it doesn't really excercise
> the VM in any way...
Its an interesting demo that 2.4 has some performance problems since 2.2
is slower than 2.0 although nowdays not much.
-
To unsubscribe
Heiko and Matthew -
I'm pretty certain this is not something beowulfish, unless perhaps
you are thinking in terms of mosix and some of the other batch/queueing
systems. Beowulf after all is a set of distributed processors,
not SMP (although an individual node maybe SMP).
regards,
Per Jessen, Lo
Hello all,
test12-pre7 seems to randomly just power off my machine.
CONFIG_APM=y and CONFIG_APM_REAL_MODE_POWER_OFF=y as well. Could this
be what is
making it power off the machine randomly? Has it been fixed in pre8?
I wasn't doing much on the machine at the time.. it just happens
sporadi
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Dietmar Kling wrote:
> I do not understand this
> "i saw it - yuck! - and now i want to kill it "
s/want to kill it/do not want to touch it/
> point of view.
> As I tried to point out. Things evolve. And
> the evolution has the right do things wrong.
> Next evolution ste
very helpful.
Technical merits and voter intent aside, this behavior is misleading and
inconsistent with previous kernels. Tools like top or a CPU dock applet show
a constantly loaded CPU. Hacking them to deduct the load from 'kapm-idled'
seems like the wrong answer.
stewart
On Mon, 11 Dec 20
> You do realize what "evolution" means? I'm not talking about the bugs
> in implementation. I'm talking about botched design. _That_ never gets
> fixed. Show me one example when that would happen and I might consider
> taking such possibility seriously.
That's what I am talking about in my "mean
** Reply to message from "Jonathan Brugge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:49:05 +0100
> I got a message about a bad CMOS and when I looked in my
> BIOS-settings I saw they were totally reset... No HD's, date was 1/1/2000,
> etc.
The BIOS will do this at boot time if it detects tha
> Technical merits and voter intent aside, this behavior is misleading and
> inconsistent with previous kernels. Tools like top or a CPU dock applet show
the goal of kernel revision is *not* to remain consistent with old stuff.
> a constantly loaded CPU. Hacking them to deduct the load from 'kap
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> very helpful.
>
> Technical merits and voter intent aside, this behavior is misleading and
> inconsistent with previous kernels. Tools like top or a CPU dock applet show
> a constantly loaded CPU. Hacking them to deduct the load from 'kapm-idled'
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 04:37:40PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Pavel Machek]
> > I'd say that warning is more acceptable than #ifdef... In cases where
> > warnings can be eliminating without ifdefs, that's okay, but this...
>
> In this case it is dead weight in the object file -- and for
Hello!
> Looks like it tries to read on socket which is already closed from other
> side. And it seems like recv did not return in this case. Is this OK, or
> kernel bug?
This smells like an unknown bug in kernel.
It is unknown, hence there is no workaround (but upgrading to 2.4).
It would be
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Doing a 'make bzImage' is NOT VM-intensive. Using this as a test
> > for the VM doesn't make any sense since it doesn't really excercise
> > the VM in any way...
>
> Its an interesting demo that 2.4 has some performance problems since 2.2
> is slower than 2.0 although nowda
Same latencies as 2.2.16 and 2.2.17 vanilla,
over 75 seconds to wait on an other screen!
And top(1) on a serial VT510 freezes.
Machine loaded with 2 setiathome and
Doug Ledford's memtest.
ASUS P2B-DS Dual PIII550 1024MB memory,
only SCSI devices (no IDE!).
Andrea Arcangeli's ..17pre6aa2, ..18pr
I goofed in the report below. I had switched to the i82365
pcmcia driver to see if it was affected by the pirq problems
the night before, and forgotten to switch back to the yenta_socket.
Switching back to the yenta_socket, plus andrewm's keventd patch
allowed the collection of cardbus pcmcia ca
Hi Alan,
I've compiled a plain 2.2.18 kernel for the HP NetServer this afternoon,
and guess what ? (ok, I know that you guessed) : the netraid card now works
correctly.
BTW, I noticed that the firmware and bios versions are improperly displayed
(only garbage). According to the code, that's becau
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> Doing a 'make bzImage' is NOT VM-intensive. Using this as a test
>> for the VM doesn't make any sense since it doesn't really excercise
>> the VM in any way...
> Its an interesting demo that 2.4 has some performance problems since 2.2
> is slower than
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Here are a few more:
>
> net/acenic.c: pci_write_config_byte(ap->pdev, PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
> net/gmac.c: PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, 8);
> scsi/sym53c8xx.c: printk(NAME53C8XX ": PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE set to %d (fix-up).\n",
For this one, this happens on
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Dietmar Kling wrote:
> > You do realize what "evolution" means? I'm not talking about the bugs
> > in implementation. I'm talking about botched design. _That_ never gets
> > fixed. Show me one example when that would happen and I might consider
> > taking such possibility s
I have a PC164 Alpha (500Mhz) and I get hard lock ups randomly when
accessing the internet. It happens very frequently (like within a few
minutes) with 2.4 kernels, but happens much more infrequently with 2.2
kernels. Also, I have to compile the kernel for generic alpha (NOT PC164)
otherwise
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Doing a 'make bzImage' is NOT VM-intensive. Using this as a test
> > for the VM doesn't make any sense since it doesn't really excercise
> > the VM in any way...
>
> Its an interesting demo that 2.4 has some performance problems
> since 2.2 is slower than
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
>
> I do however still recieve a nasty message about a pirq table
> conflict, but it does not seem to affect the operation of the
> card.
It doesn't.
> The pirq conflict message seems a little harsh though, and perhaps
> unnecessary.
It is a bit
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:03:47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Recently I had some thoughts on how to realise CPU attachment and
> detachment in a running Linux system (based on the 2.4 kernel).
>
> CPU attachment and detachment would make sense on an S/390 when there
> are several Linuxes running,
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>
> > Here are a few more:
> >
> > net/acenic.c: pci_write_config_byte(ap->pdev, PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
>
> Acenic is at least setting it to the correct values, not hardcoding it.
>
> > net/gmac.c: PCI_C
Hello Gerard!
> Having to call some pdev_enable_device() to have the cache line size
> configured looks like shit to me. After all, the BARs, INT, LATENCY TIMER,
> etc.. are configured prior to entering driver probe.
Once upon a time, they used to be, but they no longer are. Unfortunately, there
> Hello. I just noticed that in 2.2.18pre27 you can only use the aty128fb
> driver at 8 bit, because of some missing bits to drivers/video/Config.in.
> w/o this you can't use console at > 8 bit nor X. I would consider this to
> be a good thing to squash for 2.2.18 final because 2.2.18 is the 1st
Hi Linus!
> My tentative fix for this would be to make Linux never assign bus #1 or #2
> to a cardbus bridge, and start cardbus bridges at bus #8 or something like
> that. That way we'd still catch any strangeness in the pirq table, but we
> wouldn't get the message for this case which seems to
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:41:24AM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>
> There was is usual with these sorts of things, multiple problems I was
> dealing with. The first was that I was trying to use cardmgr, and my
> pcmcia config file was still trying to load epic_cb. Oops. David, you
> might wa
> > - I don't think we can say that the kernel hotplug interface is
> > complete until we have real, working, tested userspace tools. David,
> > could you please summarise the state of play here? In particular,
> > what still needs to be done?
>
> Well, for USB I would like to know whic
Hi!
> I don't remember having the same problem months (6?) ago when
> I built my first Kernel with this enabled (well, maybe I never
> touched the key).
>
> When built into the Kernel, by only pressing the
> PrintScreen/SysRq the current application is terminated (tested
> on a console and GNU s
Hi!
> Bought myself this new CPU that is mainly available for laptops.
>
> I have Tyan S1590 board which BIOS won't POST if I set cpu speed (it's
> 500Mhz chip) >300Mhz. This won't matter much in windows since I can there
> use graphical utility which allows one to set whe CPU clock multiplier i
Hi!
> > This email is here to announce the availability of a port of ORBit (the
> > GNOME ORB) to the Linux kernel. This ORB, named kORBit, is available from
> > our sourceforge web site (http://korbit.sourceforge.net/). A kernel ORB
> > allows you to write kernel extensions in CORBA and have t
Hi all,
am I right that the aic7xx version in latest test is 5.2.1 ? Is there a
reason why this is not up to date to Doug Ledfords 5.1.31 ?
TIA
With best regards
Michael Meding
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Martin Mares wrote:
> Hello Gerard!
>
> > Having to call some pdev_enable_device() to have the cache line size
> > configured looks like shit to me. After all, the BARs, INT, LATENCY TIMER,
> > etc.. are configured prior to entering driver probe.
>
> Once upon a time, the
>Hi all,
>
>am I right that the aic7xx version in latest test is 5.2.1 ? Is there a
>reason why this is not up to date to Doug Ledfords 5.1.31 ?
My hope is that the Adaptec sponsored driver will eventually
become the driver embedded in 2.4.X kernels. This driver is
currently in Alpha (Beta to b
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Doing a 'make bzImage' is NOT VM-intensive. Using this as a test
> > for the VM doesn't make any sense since it doesn't really excercise
> > the VM in any way...
>
> Its an interesting demo that 2.4 has some performance problems since 2.2
> is slower than
Hi all,
sorry, next time I should at least do sanity checks on my own email.
Of course 5.2.1 as in latest-test is newer than 5.1.something.
Just did a quick look in the source and on Dougs site and mixed the version
numbers up. Stupid me!
Greetings,
Michael Meding
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 04:38:11PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2000, John Fremlin wrote:
>
> > Two points: [snipped]
>
>
> Doing a 'make bzImage' is NOT VM-intensive. Using this as a test
> for the VM doesn't make any sense since it doesn't really excercise
> the VM i
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> How much of that is due to the fact that the 2.4.0 scheduler interrupts
> processes more often than 2.2.x? Is the better interactivity worth the
> slight drop in performance?
What better interactivity ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
Yo All!
I just tried to compile SMBFS in test12-pre8. Here is the error
message I get:
make[3]: Entering directory `/u3/local/src/linux-2.4.0-test12-pre8/fs/smbfs'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/local/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpr
As Keith Owens pointed out klogd mangled the decode, I haev run it through
ksymoops and got the following decode:
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test11. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/ (default)
-m
Ben Ford wrote:
> Why would you *ever* want to write a device driver in perl???
Well, Perl, I don't know. But the USB 'driver' for my Canon PowerShot
S20 runs in userspace. Seems a safer place to do things.
-M
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
Here's an update for my patch to enable the just released 2.2.18 kernel
to compile with any of the different versions of the StackGuard
compiler.
If anyone has any problems with it, please let me know,
greg k-h
--
greg@(kroah|wirex).com
http://immunix.org/~greg
diff -Naur -X /home/greg/linux
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 22:30:59 +0100 (CET)
From: Gérard Roudier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
> Really, in 2.4.x sparc64 requires PCI config space hackery no longer.
Really?
I was thinking about the pcivtophys() alias bus_dvma_to_mem() hacke
linux-2.4.0test12pre8/include/linux/module.h contains some
kernel-specific declarations that now reference struct list_head, which
which is only defined when __KERNEL__ is set. This causes sysklogd
and probably any other user level program that needs to include
to fail to compile.
> Hi!
>
> > I don't remember having the same problem months (6?) ago when
> > I built my first Kernel with this enabled (well, maybe I never
> > touched the key).
> >
> > When built into the Kernel, by only pressing the
> > PrintScreen/SysRq the current application is terminated (tested
> > on
Aaron Tiensivu wrote:
>Rerun the 2.4.0 with kgcc to be fair. :)
John Fremlin wrote:
>Two points: (1) gcc 2.95 makes slightly slower code than egcs-1.1
>(according to benchmarks on gcc.gnu.org) so compile 2.4 kernel with
>egcs for a fairer comparison. (2) The new VM was a performance
Ok, several
"Mohammad A. Haque" wrote:
>
> Thinko.
>
> Question is... Adam Richter posted a patch for i2o_lan.c that does
> this...
>
> static struct tq_struct i2o_post_buckets_task = {
> list: LIST_HEAD_INIT(i2o_post_buckets_task.list),
> sync: 0,
> routine: (void (*)(void *))i2o_l
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
