WHOA Gents!
Let me get some popcorn to watch this p-contest.
The way you guys are sniping at each other sounds like the good-old days,
when everyone railed me and the subsystem and ended up railing back
Guess nothing was learned from the 6+ years of flamage.
I have mellowed out with age ...
On Llu, 2005-08-22 at 11:28 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Any news about URLs? It shouldn't be too hard find them unless they
> never existed in the first place. I will work on the issues immediately.
Please learn to use the linux-kernel archive. It's quite user friendly
-
To
Any news about URLs? It shouldn't be too hard find them unless they
never existed in the first place. I will work on the issues immediately.
Bartlomiej
On 8/14/05, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/14/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sul, 2005-08-14 at
On 8/22/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Llu, 2005-08-22 at 11:28 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Any news about URLs? It shouldn't be too hard find them unless they
> > never existed in the first place. I will work on the issues immediately.
>
> Please learn to use the
On 8/22/05, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Llu, 2005-08-22 at 11:28 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Any news about URLs? It shouldn't be too hard find them unless they
never existed in the first place. I will work on the issues immediately.
Please learn to use the
Any news about URLs? It shouldn't be too hard find them unless they
never existed in the first place. I will work on the issues immediately.
Bartlomiej
On 8/14/05, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/05, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56
On Llu, 2005-08-22 at 11:28 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Any news about URLs? It shouldn't be too hard find them unless they
never existed in the first place. I will work on the issues immediately.
Please learn to use the linux-kernel archive. It's quite user friendly
-
To
WHOA Gents!
Let me get some popcorn to watch this p-contest.
The way you guys are sniping at each other sounds like the good-old days,
when everyone railed me and the subsystem and ended up railing back
Guess nothing was learned from the 6+ years of flamage.
I have mellowed out with age ...
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:33:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > > [227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
> > > CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
>
> Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
>
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:33:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
[227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
should be
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:33:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> What does a full identify data set for the drive look like ?
Here it is for the two drives. Please note that multisect was turned on
manually as well as the security freeze.
/dev/hda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model
On 8/14/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > * your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd
> > fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted)
>
> They were.
I remember discussion about
Daniel Drake wrote:
CaT wrote:
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset.
It lived a brief but noted life before being taken out without any
reason (that I
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> * your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd
> fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted)
They were.
> * you've never provided any technical details on "the stuff I broke"
I did,
On 8/14/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:01 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
> > > should be harmless.
> >
> > Therefore please submit them.
>
> Cut the crap, you know I've
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:01 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
> > should be harmless.
>
> Therefore please submit them.
Cut the crap, you know I've submitted the stuff again and again and
again along with other
On 8/14/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > > [227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
> > > CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
>
> Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
> should be
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > [227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
> > CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
should be harmless.
> > [227523.229631] hda: cache flushes not
CaT wrote:
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
Alan's driver has been merged into 2.6.13. You can get the up-to-date
Wooo!
patches here:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:08:42PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> CaT wrote:
> >1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
> > seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
> >2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset.
> > It lived a brief but noted life
CaT wrote:
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset.
It lived a brief but noted life before being taken out without any
reason (that I spotted) in
CaT wrote:
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset.
It lived a brief but noted life before being taken out without any
reason (that I spotted) in
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:08:42PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
CaT wrote:
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset.
It lived a brief but noted life before
CaT wrote:
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
Alan's driver has been merged into 2.6.13. You can get the up-to-date
Wooo!
patches here:
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
[227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
should be harmless.
[227523.229631] hda: cache flushes not supported
On 8/14/05, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
[227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache,
CHS=24321/255/63, BUG
Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
should be harmless.
On 8/14/05, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:01 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It
should be harmless.
Therefore please submit them.
Cut the crap, you know I've submitted the stuff
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
* your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd
fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted)
They were.
* you've never provided any technical details on the stuff I broke
I did, several
Daniel Drake wrote:
CaT wrote:
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in Andrew Mortons mm patchset.
It lived a brief but noted life before being taken out without any
reason (that I
On 8/14/05, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
* your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd
fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted)
They were.
I remember discussion about
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:33:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
What does a full identify data set for the drive look like ?
Here it is for the two drives. Please note that multisect was turned on
manually as well as the security freeze.
/dev/hda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model
Having an IDE card with one of these chipsets has left me with a bit of
a quandry. I've seen 2 different patch, both seemingly not going
anywhere.
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in
Having an IDE card with one of these chipsets has left me with a bit of
a quandry. I've seen 2 different patch, both seemingly not going
anywhere.
1. Alan Cox's IDE driver that was included in his ac patchset, which
seems to have died at 2.6.11ac7.
2. A brief visit from a SCSI IDE driver in
33 matches
Mail list logo
