Hi,
On 02/24/2010 03:32 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 13:55 Wed 24 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
snip
Where necessary libv4l currently has code snippets like:
#ifndef V4L2_PIX_FMT_SPCA501
#define V4L2_PIX_FMT_SPCA501 v4l2_fourcc('S','5','0','1') /* YUYV per line */
#endif
I don't think
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 07:05 AM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 16:51 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me,
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 07:05 AM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 16:51 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you,
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is
On 13:55 Wed 24 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
The better here is to have the latest kernel headers copied on the tree.
This way, it is possible to compile libv4l2 with an older kernel version and
later upgrade the
Hi all,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
I know that was mentioned then, but re-thinking this, as this will all
be Linux specific, I don't really see a need for autotools atm, and as
I personally find autotools a bit overcomplicated. I would like to try
just using plain
Hello all,
On 02/23/2010 10:51 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil and
On 22:12 Mon 22 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
According to the wiki[1] these tools are without a maintainer. So, if
no one cares about them enough to make releases why merge them and
clutter up the git tree with dead code?
[1]
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
git
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
git clone
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 10:01 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 10:01 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
Manu Abraham wrote:
and we've got some comments at the mailing list. Btw, the patches
I added there also adds DVB-S2 support to szap/scan, but tests
are needed, since I don't have any satellite dish nowadays.
Btw, I did spend time to review your code before it is pulled in. You
did not
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Question: shouldn't we merge dvb-apps and v4l-utils? The alevtv tool was
merged into dvb-apps, but while that tool supports dvb, it also supports
v4l2. Just like we merged dvb and v4l in a single repository, so I think we
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
git
Manu Abraham wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 10:01 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
[snip]
What's the advantage in merging the dvb and v4l2 utils, other than to
make the download/clone bigger ?
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 22:12 Mon 22 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
That's said, if all the issues are the ones listed above, I can try
to address them on the next months, to put it into a better
shape. That's said, I don't think we should have a single
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
What's the advantage in merging the dvb and v4l2 utils, other than to
make the download/clone bigger ?
There aren't any big advantages on merging, nor there are big advantages on
keeping
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil and dougsland.
I see good, thanks! Can someone (Douglas ?) with
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil and
dougsland.
I see good, thanks! Can
Am Dienstag, den 23.02.2010, 13:45 +0400 schrieb Manu Abraham:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat
On 16:51 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil
and dougsland.
I see
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
git clone git://ifup.org/philips/create-v4l-utils.git
cd create-v4l-utils/
On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
git clone
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
According to the wiki[1] these tools are without a maintainer. So, if
no one cares about them enough to make releases why merge them and
clutter up the git tree with dead code?
[1] http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/LinuxTV_dvb-apps
That's weird. I've
Hi,
On 01/24/2010 01:42 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/21/2010 08:23 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
snip
Yes, but, as we have also non-c code, some rules there don't apply.
For example the rationale for not using // comments don't apply to c++,
since it is
Hi all,
On 01/21/2010 08:34 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:46:05 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi,
On 01/21/2010 08:23 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
snip
Yes, but, as we have also non-c code, some rules there don't apply.
For example the rationale for not using // comments don't apply to c++,
since it is there since the first definition.
Most apps are already in 'kernel' style. The main
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/21/2010 08:23 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
snip
Yes, but, as we have also non-c code, some rules there don't apply.
For example the rationale for not using // comments don't apply to c++,
since it is there since the first definition.
Most apps are already
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:07:32 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
I've different experience in the projects with git I've used, as
long as there are some governance rules (like never ever push -f,
always do a rebase fix your stuff and then push, and
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:46:05 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
So here is how I see v4l-utils.git being laid out based on what others
have said:
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
test/
Hi,
On 01/19/2010 12:08 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
snip
I do have one proposal: parts of our hg tree are independent of git: v4l2-apps,
possibly some firmware build code (not 100% sure of that),
Hi Hans,
Hi,
On 01/19/2010 12:08 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
snip
I do have one proposal: parts of our hg tree are independent of git:
v4l2-apps,
possibly some firmware build code (not 100% sure
Hi Hans,
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 09:36:08 Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/19/2010 12:08 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
snip
I do have one proposal: parts of our hg tree are independent of
Hi,
The uvcdynctrl utility is part of the libwebcam project:
http://www.quickcamteam.net/software/libwebcam
But given that libwebcam is unmaintained and not used by anything AFAIK, I'm
patching
uvcdynctrl to no longer need it. The plan is to add uvcdynctrl to libv4l
soon, as that
is
Hi,
On 01/20/2010 10:54 AM, Paulo Assis wrote:
Hi,
The uvcdynctrl utility is part of the libwebcam project:
http://www.quickcamteam.net/software/libwebcam
But given that libwebcam is unmaintained and not used by anything AFAIK, I'm
patching
uvcdynctrl to no longer need it. The plan is to add
Hans Verkuil wrote:
4) v4l2-apps - I agree that splitting it could be a good idea, provided
that we find
a way to handle the few cases where we have example applications at
the media docs.
Note that v4l2-apps also contains libv4l, it so happens that I've been
discussing moving
libv4l to
Hi,
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
4) v4l2-apps - I agree that splitting it could be a good idea, provided
that we find
a way to handle the few cases where we have example applications at
the media docs.
Note that v4l2-apps also contains
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
maybe the better is to port it to -git (in a way that we can
preserve the log history).
I have a small script I used to convert
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
maybe the better is to port it to -git (in a way that we can
preserve the log history).
I have a small
On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
maybe the better is to port it to -git (in a
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:07:32 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
maybe the better is to port it to
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:46:05 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
As we're discussing about having a separate tree
48 matches
Mail list logo
