Re: IPX networking

2002-10-28 Thread Sergey Suleymanov
> Stas Sergeev writes: Stas> Doesn't look healthy to me. Does this patch help? It does. Thanks. Stas> Patch is completely untested, but it compiles:) Well, it has tested now. :) -- Sergey Suleymanov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-28 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Lars Bjørndal wrote: > Bart Oldeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Lars Bjørndal wrote: > > > >> I've noticed that if I use dosemu-1.0.1, the mem-command gives, in the > >> line "largest executable program size" 617K, 1.1.3.5, the same command > >> and

RE: ms-dos w/dosemu

2002-10-28 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Joshua Gaines wrote: > Thanks for the quick response. That's OK, but please cc the list. Private mail is generally deprecated unless invited. > We've actually got an old FoxPro system that runs under DOS. > I guess what I'm looking for then are the instructions f

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-28 Thread Lars Bjørndal
Thank you! Now, wp.exe works perfect! Lars Bart Oldeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Lars Bjørndal wrote: > >> How do I unpack the wp.exe-file? > > try this: > http://www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/msdos/execomp/unp411.zip > > I don't completely understan

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-28 Thread Lars Bjørndal
Bart Oldeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Lars Bjørndal wrote: > >> I've noticed that if I use dosemu-1.0.1, the mem-command gives, in the >> line "largest executable program size" 617K, 1.1.3.5, the same command >> and config gives 611K. Why, do you think? > This problem was

I can't run RM COBOL programs

2002-10-28 Thread Marcelo Daniel Arroyo
Hi. When I try run a RM-COBOL 85 program under DOSEMU, it can't open files. Can you help me? Thanks in advance. -- Marcelo Arroyo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/

Re: ms-dos w/dosemu

2002-10-28 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On 28 Oct 2002, Joshua Gaines wrote: > I'm very new to linux and am trying to use dosemu to network into an NT > Domain. Unfortunately, even after downloading a version of Lan Manager > that boasts 'FreeDos' compatibility, I still receive an "Incorrect DOS > Version" error every time Ne

Re: dosemu-1.1.3.5 for testing.

2002-10-28 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Grigory Batalov wrote: > On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:59:47 -0400 (EDT) > Bart Oldeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > it's available at > > http://www.dosemu.org/testing > > Also mkbindist-related part (sed) of patch-1.1.3.5 seems to be > broken. You should apply this patch. T

ms-dos w/dosemu

2002-10-28 Thread Joshua Gaines
I'm very new to linux and am trying to use dosemu to network into an NT Domain. Unfortunately, even after downloading a version of Lan Manager that boasts 'FreeDos' compatibility, I still receive an "Incorrect DOS Version" error every time Net Services attempt to load. Is there any documentation o

Re: IPX networking

2002-10-28 Thread Stas Sergeev
Hello. Sergey Suleymanov wrote: When I run dosemu without root privs, it says: (here 333 is internal net of the native NetWare server) ERROR: IPX: Failure adding route <0333 through 0111:0001> Is this ok? Doesn't look healthy to me. Does this patch help? Patch is

1.1.3.5 compiling problems

2002-10-28 Thread Boris Stevenson
I just upgraded to glibc 2.3.1 and a newer bison and when I compile, I get the following.. make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/dosemu-1.1.3/src/base/init' gcc -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -MD -mcpu=i686 -fno-strict-aliasing -DGCC_VERSION_CODE=3002 -DASM_PEDANTIC -DGLIBC_VERSION_CODE=20

Re: dosemu-1.1.3.5 for testing.

2002-10-28 Thread Grigory Batalov
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:59:47 -0400 (EDT) Bart Oldeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it's available at > http://www.dosemu.org/testing Also mkbindist-related part (sed) of patch-1.1.3.5 seems to be broken. You should apply this patch. -- Grigory Batalov. --- dist/mkbindist.orig Mon Oct 28 16:10

IPX networking

2002-10-28 Thread Sergey Suleymanov
These are my IPX nets: solt:~# cat /proc/net/ipx_interface NetworkNode_Address Primary Device Frame_Type 0111 0001 Yes Internal None 0777 00A0D216FF6B No eth1 802.3 0555 00C026A1AA2A No eth2 802.3 0666 00104

display multi-character under dosemu

2002-10-28 Thread Gene Leung
Hi to the list member, Currently, I have an old clipper program need to run on DOSEMU to access my data stored in the Novell 4.11 server, it works properly, however the multi-character Chinese big5 font can not display properly. I am using the following command to invoke the terminal console: /

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-28 Thread Stas Sergeev
Hello. Hartmut Figge wrote: It doesn't *cure* the problem, because the real problem is an exepack's bugs and not the default DOS loader. To clarify: it cured the problem with pushover. Or should i say, it circumvented the problem caused by exepack? That sounds better:) Can we agree, that th

Re: dosemu-1.1.3.5 for testing.

2002-10-28 Thread Sergey Suleymanov
> Grigory Batalov writes: Grigory> Should KEYB_TR be defined in some other place too, or I Grigory> have to use plugin_kbd_unicode ? Old keyboard code don't has turkish lauout. :( Grigory> Or I can safely remove next part from lexer.l.in ? --- tr Grigory> MAY_BE { yylval->i_

Re: dosemu-1.1.3.5 for testing.

2002-10-28 Thread Grigory Batalov
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:59:47 -0400 (EDT) Bart Oldeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it's available at > http://www.dosemu.org/testing When compiling with plugin_keyboard instead of plugin_kbd_unicode I get error: ... gcc -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -MD -mcpu=i586 -fno-strict-a

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-28 Thread Stas Sergeev
Hello. Bart Oldeman wrote: a) the DOS time is the same as in the previous PIC call. PIC schedules the next activation time and then works in "polling" mode to see when that time is reached. Even when it reached, there are no guarantees that it is possible to fire the int right away, so it can ke