On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Matthew Stapleton wrote:
>
> Is there a way to convert from TeX to the MSWord DOC format? The reason
> I want to know is as follows. I am a student who is wanting to start
> writing all his papers in TeX. However, I sometimes submit papers for
> publication and-or for classe
Hello,
Is there a way to convert from TeX to the MSWord DOC format? The reason
I want to know is as follows. I am a student who is wanting to start
writing all his papers in TeX. However, I sometimes submit papers for
publication and-or for classes, both of which require usually the MSWord
form
I forgot to mention, on kernel 2.4.18+patch, I have had no problems
at all.
Conway S. Smith
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:47:34 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've been having problems with major filesystem corruption on
> kernels
> 2.4.19, 2.4.20, and 2.4.21.
> I'm pretty sure it's a problem with t
I've been having problems with major filesystem corruption on kernels
2.4.19, 2.4.20, and 2.4.21.
I'm pretty sure it's a problem with the driver for the PCI expansion IDE
controller the drives are on,
and I've reported this problem to the manufacturer (Promise Technology
Inc, www.promise.com),
but
I didn't mean to do a HUGE mail about this... so I made as short as
possible.
- Original Message -
From: "Ray Olszewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: problems with Apache, FTP, SAMBA
> At 02:37 PM 6/19/2003 -0400, Alan Bor
At 02:37 PM 6/19/2003 -0400, Alan Bort wrote:
Ok... her is my problem:
I have apache2, proftpd and samba on two machines. Though
I have them
configured correctly (at least I think so) I have the fopllowing
problem. Machine A has access to internet trough machine B. From A I
can s
Ok... her is my problem:
I have apache2, proftpd and samba on two machines. Though I have them
configured correctly (at least I think so) I have the fopllowing
problem. Machine A has access to internet trough machine B. From A I
can see and use B's apache perfectly. BUT from B to
You sent this to me personally; I'm replying to the list, since that is how
I prefer to provide technical assistance.
I think your error is in misunderstanding what "make oldconfig" does. It
does NOT magically cause the new compile options to match your running
kernel. It simply makes whatever
This report is far too incomplete to get a good response. First of all,
your earlier message asked about applications "like Xwindows", and the ones
you list here neither include X nor are similar to it in any interesting
way I can think of.
Second, selected, context-free log output gives a trou
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 13:51, Amin wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:25:33 +0300, Halil Demirezen
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, they all seem nice for initial. And extra, bh processing, spinlocks
> > and usage of semaphores in linux kernel, the cache tables.. etc etc.
> >
> > I am lookin
I have installed RH8.0 in my system.
Then I have downloaded the linux kernel 2.4.18 and
configured it and compiled it to get new image.
I have used the old configuration(make oldconfig) with
my RH8.0(2.4.18-14).
when I boot into the new image,I have observed the
following things form the /var/l
On Thursday 19 June 2003 02:24, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> At 11:29 PM 6/18/2003 +1200, cr wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > 1:2345:respawn:/sbin/getty 38400 tty1
> >
> >Yep, they're there.Would the '2345' be runlevels?
>
> Yes.
> [...]
>
> > > The other thing to do is to check that when you do start
12 matches
Mail list logo