I have linux 2.2.3 with raid014519990309.. patch.
On a PPC (Mac G3) system, I am getting what seems to be memory buffer
courruption when using raidstart. The same kernel source run with i386
architecture seems to be fine.
To show the problem, I do something like the following...
# cd ~me
#
Maybe that is the problem...
Greetings, Dietmar
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Absender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Can't get started with raid 1
Empfänger: Joe Beauchamp
Kopie-Empfänger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: 13. Apr 1999 18:07
hi, Joe,
I just wonder why you use hdb2 and hdb3
Hi folks,
we are trying to set up a mirrored (raid-1) system for reliability
but it is not possible according
to the latest HOWTO to swap onto a raid volume. Is there any change on
this?
Has anyone set up a system like this with/without swap configured and
what is your experience?
We have
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
we are trying to set up a mirrored (raid-1) system for reliability
but it is not possible according
to the latest HOWTO to swap onto a raid volume. Is there any change on
this?
it does work for me (i do not actually use it as
Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it does work for me (i do not actually use it as such, but i've done some
stresstesting under heavy load). Let me know if you find any problems.
Hmm? Since when does swapping work on raid-1? How about raid-5?
--
Osma Ahvenlampi
On 14 Apr 1999, Osma Ahvenlampi wrote:
Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it does work for me (i do not actually use it as such, but i've done some
stresstesting under heavy load). Let me know if you find any problems.
Hmm? Since when does swapping work on raid-1? How about raid-5?
I'm a fan of SW RAID (a motherboard with 3 LVD busses, 2 EIDE busses, and 1 W
bus kind of satisfies our disk IO requirements), but I've being pressured to
buy some HW RAID for our "main" NFS servers.
The suggestion is either AMI 438 (which I was suprised not to see mentioned in
I myself use a AMI 428 MegaRAID II controller in a Dell PowerEdge 2300.
According to the driver info (version 0.93 distributed by Jeffrey Jones
of AMI) it also supports the 438 board.
Kees Metzger
Philips Corporate IT
Piete Brooks wrote:
I'm a fan of SW RAID (a motherboard with 3 LVD
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Piete Brooks wrote:
I'm a fan of SW RAID (a motherboard with 3 LVD busses, 2 EIDE busses, and 1 W
bus kind of satisfies our disk IO requirements), but I've being pressured to
buy some HW RAID for our "main" NFS servers.
The suggestion is either AMI 438 (which I was
Mustafa Bodur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mkraid: aborted
ioctl(5, 0x40480923, 0x804f758) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
kernel is 2.2.3 and tools are raidtools-0.90.
i have feel like that i am missing something obvious :-)
The obvious is that you did not install the RAID kernel
Hello All, Cool now when do we get the new alpha-lilo
alpha-silo, alpha-milo tools to support the alpha-raid ?
I know, I know, 'hack away...' tnx, JimL
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:
On 14 Apr 1999, Osma Ahvenlampi wrote:
Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i have feel like that i am missing something obvious :-)
What does /var/log/messages say ?
On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 02:55:21PM +0100, Piete Brooks wrote:
I'm a fan of SW RAID (a motherboard with 3 LVD busses, 2 EIDE busses, and 1 W
bus kind of satisfies our disk IO requirements), but I've being pressured to
buy some HW RAID for our "main" NFS servers.
What do you need the lower
Hi guys!
I'm looking for some advice.
Our IT department is going to buy us a development server for me to put
Linux onto. They are determined to go with a Hardware RAID solution and a
multiprocessor motherboard.
I would be _very_ grateful if any of you could advise me on hardware that is
very
Swapping to a file should work, but if I remember correctly you get horrible
performance.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 9:36 AM
To: Linux Raid
Subject: Swap on raid
Hi
Errr?
It wasn't a month ago that this was not possible because it needed to
allocate memory for the raid and couldn't because it needed to swap to do
it? Was I imagining this or have you guys been working too hard!
Either way, brill!
James
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:
On 14
16 matches
Mail list logo