Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-07 Thread Mika Kuoppala
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Mike Frisch wrote: You're kidding, aren't you? Seems like RedHat is really trying to go the SuSE way and become Windows... Oh, please do tell why a graphical installer is a bad thing... especially if it allows installation to a software RAID array. It's

Is Raid Stable?

1999-10-07 Thread Stephen Millard
From the accounts I have observed, it appears questionable that Raid (software) for Linux is ready for serious use. Indeed, the product support tech at RedHat inferred this also. I am about to install a Linux server to a client, and the question I have is: Will the installation of Raid be a

Re: autodetect help needed

1999-10-07 Thread David Robinson
All looks fine:-) I believe the persistant superblock is put at the end of the partition. This is why you need to make the raid device then format it with e2fsck. Your first configuration should have worked unless you somehow overwrote the persistant superblock at the end of the

RAID, Netatalk, Quota

1999-10-07 Thread Amr A.Aysha
Hi, I am newbie in linux, and I very delighted if I can receive some information regarding RAID-1, Netatalk, and Quota system. Here is my configuration : Kernel 2.2.12 and two disks (SCSI) First Disk Second Disk / /Head /swap /swap /user

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different - installs

1999-10-07 Thread Bill Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Alvin Oga wrote: I'd be interested in writing an installer/duplicator... - I like to do something like: a. give um a bootable cdrom... ( self detect the hardwara ) ( aka rescue cdrom ) Try the PXE stuff in redhat

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-07 Thread James Knowles
Oh, please do tell why a graphical installer is a bad thing... especially if it allows installation to a software RAID array. because it's bloat. 'plague from seattle' :) Better reason is that any distribution which insists on installing GUI's is quite useless when installing small

RE: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-07 Thread Vincenzo Jon - IL
I couldn't agree more! If one doesn't accept the need for diversity and choice in damn near everything, he(or she) should just be sheep and follow M$. A GUI is exactly what we need. Non-Technical people fear things that appear(at least initially) unfriendly. Remeber the first time you sat down

RE: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-07 Thread Shaw, Marco
Although I object strongly to this argument about non-technical users being able to use it. I like GUIs for the introduction of tools, but beyond an introduction, and when I'm comfortable with the tool, I'd much prefer the command line to get the "real error messages" and for remote management

Re: RAID, Netatalk, Quota

1999-10-07 Thread Stephen Waters
--SNIP-- Is it possible to mount /dev/md# as macintosh volume to my Apple computer via netatalk. abridged procedure: make your /dev/md* devices mke2fs /dev/md* mount /dev/md* somewhere configure netatalk to export those mounts After that, is it possible to implement Quota system for

Notify scripts?

1999-10-07 Thread Wayne Buttles
I have been playing with raid on a stock Redhat 6.0 install for a couple days now. I think I have finally figured everything out. I have raid5 working with 3 drives automounting via the kernel with type fd partitions. I powered off a drive and then added it back with raidhotadd on a

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-07 Thread Lawrence Dickson
James and all following, You seem to have missed the point Lauri made. We aren't saying don't offer GUIs. We are saying please offer GUIs AND offer command/script control capability. Then that baby user can make his first steps AND we wannabe power users don't get trapped in a pretty box of

RE: Re: 2.2.13pre15 SMP+IDE test summary

1999-10-07 Thread thx
is it correct that this failing kernel didnt have the RAID patch applied? No, it was with raid too (all pre15 runs were). But this specific test result is not of much use anyway, since there was an eventually problematic reject with the Unified IDE patch (but still: that kernel survived

Re: Is Raid Stable?

1999-10-07 Thread thm
Well, its crowded at least :) Seriously, I know and respect the redhat people (ought to, used to work there). They would not have gone anywhere near the raid code if it was gonna kill reliability in 6.1. For more direct results, I've got a raid 1 on my web server, a raid 0 in test (stupid jedi

Re: 2.2.13pre15 SMP+IDE test summary

1999-10-07 Thread manfreds
PIO request cues...as they take longer to serviceis is possible that we are slipping out of the rq- order and loading the do_ide_request with repeated calls more often than the acknowledged and cleared? What about filling everything with printk-messages, stopping klogd and adding

Re: 2.2.13pre15 SMP+IDE test summary

1999-10-07 Thread Mike Black
Do you have anything that monitors temperature on your system? I had similar lockups on a dual-SMP and found out my 2nd CPU was overheating and was causing lockups. Removing the 2nd CPU fixed my lockup problems. And, putting in two new CPUs also fixed it (Duall PIII/500 now running for 5 days).