Jim,
If you have the PCI space and the cards, maybe re-construct the whole thing
with each drive on a seperate controller... That will give you faster
access, as each controller can allocate it's 20mb/sec to each drive.
At 07:41 PM 12/12/1999 +, Jim Ford wrote:
>
>It's all worked so well
I earlier posted a message describing my difficulties with
booting root Raid0. From the start I was uneasy about the vulnerabilty of my
suggested setup, so I later decided to get another 1Gig disk and go for Raid5.
This seems to be the most popular mode and therefore well supported by
experi
This is an update to my previous mail about problem with the 5*36.5 GB
Soft RAID setup.
I'm not sure if this problem is RAID or Ext2 related. I just created a
new raid (without creating any filesystem etc. until the rebuild
finished).
When fsck:ing a _NEW_ filesystem (no options where used when
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 12 12:18:48 1999
>
> It sounds like 2.3.29 forgot the raidtools patch to be included.
> try patching it and enter N to any errors then try again.
SighAgain?
It would be really really nice if the kernel maintainers would
recognize the relative stability of th
It sounds like 2.3.29 forgot the raidtools patch to be included.
try patching it and enter N to any errors then try again.
At 09:19 PM 12/12/1999 +1100, Andre Pang wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I've been succesfully using raidtools-0.90 (from
>ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha) for the 2.2.x ke
[ Sunday, December 12, 1999 ] Andre Pang wrote:
> I've been succesfully using raidtools-0.90 (from
> ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha) for the 2.2.x kernel range but
> I've been unable to get them to work with 2.3.29.
The 0.90 RAID hasn't made it to 2.3.x yet... the last few days
Hi,
I've been succesfully using raidtools-0.90 (from
ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha) for the 2.2.x kernel range but
I've been unable to get them to work with 2.3.29.
Is there a more recent of the raidtools I should be using, and if so,
where do I get them from? I've search
