[ Wednesday, January 5, 2000 ] Chris R. Brown wrote:
> We have had a 108G RAID 5 array (8 * IBM 16G) running rock solid
> for months on Linux 2.2.11 using raidtools 0.90.0. We had the array
> filled to about 29G when hardware started to hose out. /dev/hdc
> started to get weird, and we t
Hello everyone,
We have had a 108G RAID 5 array (8 * IBM 16G) running rock solid
for months on Linux 2.2.11 using raidtools 0.90.0. We had the array
filled to about 29G when hardware started to hose out. /dev/hdc
started to get weird, and we took it out, replacing it with another
drive.
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, James Manning wrote:
>I noticed set_blocksize was left out... so was it included
>in 2.2.14 vanilla and there's a diff. source of the problem
Yes it was included into 2.2.14.
>the linux-raid guy is having using the 2.2.11 patch? hmmm
Yes that's the source of the problem. Pe
>[ Wednesday, January 5, 2000 ] Brian Kress wrote:
>> I think Andrea Arcangeli has a fix for this. Search the lkml
>> archives for something on set blocksize. It's an incremental
>> patch over RAID 0.90.
Yes, if you are using the new raid code with 2.2.14 you should apply also
this below patc
I'm having problem after I enable (mkraid) my raid partition. It's a
simple 2 SCSI RAID and the partition that I'm dealing with is identical
and unused on both disks. My raidtab entry is this:
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 1
nr-raid-disks 2
persistent-superblock
does this work with Linear RAID also ?..
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Innovation Strategies wrote:
>
> IS> How can I reconstruct my RAID1?
>
> If you're using the new RAID code (which you should be), you should be
> able to just "raidhotadd /dev/hda5". It will add back into the
> > Does anyone know of an ATA-66 IDE RAID controller for Linux? I have seen
> > the Arco product at http://www.arcoide.com/dupli-pci.htm but it is only
> > UDMA/33.
> >
>
> You might look at the RaidZone product line (http://www.raidzone.com)
> although it might be more than what you're lookin
[ Wednesday, January 5, 2000 ] Brian Kress wrote:
> I think Andrea Arcangeli has a fix for this. Search the lkml
> archives for something on set blocksize. It's an incremental
> patch over RAID 0.90.
The set_blocksize patches the last of which I see are at
kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/
I had the same problem with the 2.2.14pre18 configuration I'm using. I
can tell you how to get around it, but not why it happens. (Hey, I'm a
newbie!)
If you edit the /etc/fstab and tell the system not to dump or e2fsck the
raid (set the 5th and 6th columns to 0), everything will boot and moun
I think Andrea Arcangeli has a fix for this. Search the lkml
archives for something on set blocksize. It's an incremental
patch over RAID 0.90.
Brian
>
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to warn everybody not to use raid0145-19990824-2.2.11 together with
>kernel
> 2.2.14: at least in my configurat
Hi,
I just wanted to warn everybody not to use raid0145-19990824-2.2.11 together with
kernel
2.2.14: at least in my configuration (two IDE drives with RAID-1, root on /dev/mdx)
the
kernel panics with "B_FREE inserted into queues" at boot time.
This seems to be some kind of a known problem, h
On Wed, 05 Jan 2000 11:00:29 +0100, you wrote:
>At 21:39 04.01.00 GMT, Marc Haber wrote:
>>On Sat, 13 Nov 1999 15:59:50 GMT, you wrote:
>>>For a test, I disconnected sda while system power was off and expected
>>>the system to come up on the remaining disks. However, the RAID array
>>>wasn't detec
Hi,
is there a way to remove a RAID-1, or to convert the array to an standard
ext2fs, without erasing all the files on the disk ? I would like to keep all
the files without having to do an entire restore of a previous backup which
takes a very long time.
Thanks.
---
Sylvain BARTHELEMY, Economis
Raid wrote:
>
> Does anyone know of an ATA-66 IDE RAID controller for Linux? I have seen
> the Arco product at http://www.arcoide.com/dupli-pci.htm but it is only
> UDMA/33.
>
You might look at the RaidZone product line (http://www.raidzone.com)
although it might be more than what you're lookin
-Original Message-
From: Kelina
>>Assuming this is yet again the cause of problems, is anyone else getting
>>sick of
>>stupid distros like Suse and Mandrake that include raidtools-0.90 without
>>including support in the kernel?
>
>I keep replying to these emails, all the users are thankf
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 05:35:19PM -0800, Michael wrote:
> Could the Raid experts revisit a portion of the discussion about swap
> on raid. I understand that the use/non-use of buffer space during
> reconsturction vs swap creates a problem for swap on raid, however in
> my pea-sized brain it ap
Hi Maillist Members,
I've done a successfull upgrade for my raid5 TestDrive (9x 7MBytes) from mdtools 0.4x
to the aktuell RaidTools 0.90 with persistent-superblock. All auto startup works best.
Due to the Mail from Brian a 'few days' ago I was very carefull with that procedure,
only going step
At 19:59 04.01.00 -, Ron McKelvey wrote:
>Out of 4 dirves, I have 2 good drives. I know the data on the 3rd drive is
>still good, I just need to force the raid to come back up with no regard to
>the event timer and the superblock update time inconsistency.
>Can you help me force this thing t
At 21:39 04.01.00 GMT, Marc Haber wrote:
>On Sat, 13 Nov 1999 15:59:50 GMT, you wrote:
>>For a test, I disconnected sda while system power was off and expected
>>the system to come up on the remaining disks. However, the RAID array
>>wasn't detected:
>>
>>|autodetecting RAID arrays
>>|autorun...
>
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999 09:35:55 +0100, you wrote:
>In contrast, raidstart uses the raidtab just for getting ONE device (the
>first one) for your raid device. It reads the superblock off this first
>devices and uses this info to add the other devices.
On my test machine, I have found out something t
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000 14:24:22 +0100, you wrote:
>make a conf file specifying as failed-disk the drive
>you cut the power to, then mkraid, data should be there.
Isn't mkraid destructive any more?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc
Hi,
how about Promise Raid 0,1 Controller.
Have a look @ http://www.promise.com/Products/products.htm#ideraid
By, Barney
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Raid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2000 04:03
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: IDE RAID controller?
22 matches
Mail list logo
