> Hi,
> I'm running RH6.1 and have a raid-1 system of 3 disks (2 mirror, 1 spare),
and I'm using raid autodetect (which works fine with RH and 2.2.12 kernel).
>
> After upgrading to kernel 2.2.14 it doesn't work anymore, I've put the
right module in initrd and it does load the module, but when it
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, domdev wrote:
> md: md0: raid array is not clean -- starting background reconstruction
> raid1: raid set md0 not clean; reconstructing mirrors
> md2 [events: 0001](write) md2's sb offset: 208576
> Got md request, not good...
> ===
>
> T
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > After upgrading to kernel 2.2.14 it doesn't work anymore, I've put the
> > right module in initrd and it does load the module, but when it wants
> > to mount /dev/md0 it says" invalid argument.
[ Wednesday, January 26, 2000 ] Tomas Fasth wrote:
> Did you remember to
Manage to spare 2 IDE drive. Create 3 partition of 100MB on each and construct
Raid5
md1= hdc1, hdc2, hdc3
md2= hdd1, hdd2, hdd3
md0= md1, md2
but when try to construct Raid1(md0) on top of them system hanged. this is the
responce
handling MD devic
See below.
Danilo Godec wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Edward Schernau wrote:
>
> > I am running 2.2.13, whose config script has options for RAID. I have
> > raidtools-0.90. Why/Do I need to patch? Pointers appreciated.
>
> You have to patch because plain 2.2.13 kernel has an 'old style'
I cannot find a patch for 2.2.14, not even for 2.2.12
Since redhat uses the 2.2.12 kernel -a-?? (2.2.11?) patch I wonder;
is it save to use the 2.2.11 patch on the 2.2.14 kernel?
Thanks for the answer patch thing happy to have it in my ~/mbox I'm very happy anyhow
with or without patch, the e
I assume you are looking for double redundancy--survive a double failure.
It would be more efficient to do raid5 on top of several raid1 arrays. You
will have more arrays, but the checksum will only be calculated once. If you
tried raid1 above raid5, you would be calculating the checksum twice (o
Something more on the non-working raid-1 with RH 6.1 when upgrading to kernel 2.2.14.
There are all kinds of files in the kernel source different with respect to raid,
especially :
/usr/src/linux-2.2.12/include/config/autodetect/raid.h
the directory include/config/autodetect doesn't exist in
Did you remember to patch the kernel with the new software raid code?
The kernel RedHat distributes with RH6.1 is already patched. If you
pull down standard 2.2.14 kernel source from kernel.org or a mirror,
the patch is missing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm running RH6.1 and have a ra
>
>
> How many drives are you running from that PS? How
> many cards? What kind of a processor?
(2) 10GB 7200RPM IDE Maxtor disk
(2) 366MHz Celerons Overclocked to 594MHz, 2.0V core
(3) Case fans
(1) 486 fan mounted on the BX chipset heatsink
(2) Glacier 4500C (think thats the model) - 2 s
oyah,
it also says something about /dev/md.. not being raid0 or linear, which is true,
because it's raid-1. but it's not booting from /dev/md.. so it shouldn't matter.
Cheers,
Jeroen.
Hi,
I'm running RH6.1 and have a raid-1 system of 3 disks (2 mirror, 1 spare), and I'm
using raid autodetect (which works fine with RH and 2.2.12 kernel).
After upgrading to kernel 2.2.14 it doesn't work anymore, I've put the right module in
initrd and it does load the module, but when it want
Hi.
Is it possible to construct Raid1 on Top of 2 Raid5 arrays (all
software raids) ?
Thanks.
Hi there, just want to share some nasty experience (and what to do to solve
it).
Two weeks ago I installed a Raid-5 on two IDE and one SCSI partition under
SuSE 6.3 with the raid0145 patches.
The SCSI drive hangs of an adaptec controller. The drives were type fd and
autodetection of raid is on in
Derek Shaw wrote:
>
> I'm reviewing the docs in preparation for installing the
> software RAID. Specifically RAID 1.
>
> The readme for raidtools-0.41 says:
> "RAID-1 doesn't support mixed SCSI/non-SCSI pairs."
>
> Can anyone tell me if this is still the case?
Personally, I'd get raidtools-0.
Kevin Carpenter wrote:
>
> Earlier I believe I caught reference to someone else on this list who
> was having problems with resets working on their BP6. If memory serves,
> they resolved this by upgrading to a 300W power supply.
>
> Alas, I am experiencing the same reset issues and already have
Earlier I believe I caught reference to someone else on this list who
was having problems with resets working on their BP6. If memory serves,
they resolved this by upgrading to a 300W power supply.
Alas, I am experiencing the same reset issues and already have a 300W power
supply in my Supermicr
Edward Schernau wrote:
>
> Note the crosspost.
>
> Ive had occasional, maybe 6 lockups since I bought my ABit BP6/dual
> system, a month ago.
>
> Since installing the raid patches on my hpt366-patched kernel last
> week, its locked up much more often, tonight 4 times.
>
> I left it running all
I first used the patche at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha/raid0145-19990824-2.2.11
Although not for kernel 2.2.13 most of it patches fine, with 2-3 files
needing handadjustments and one: linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c needing
more attention as some LVM code has been inserted th
Some threads never die... I'm continuing one here from October...
Thanx for the great summary of how to get a system up and running, but I
have a question about the setup below.
I'm trying to get some 40GB Maxtors up using either Promise Ultra33's or
Ultra66 boards (33's in the logs below). Wit
Thank you for all the reply's I received.
I figured out what the problem was, and of course it was something that makes you want
to kick yourself
right in the %*@#^! Anyway, I was using the wrong boot disk! I was using the boot and
suplemental disks
for RH6.0 for a RH6.1 installation. The thing i
21 matches
Mail list logo
