Kevin Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey there guys, got a question for you. I just received one of
these cards and it is basically a dual channel raid system. The problem
I am having is that RH6.1 recognizes the first drive and only the first
drive. Here is the config.
We fixed a
Hi there,
I have an Adaptec 4-channel raid controller. I have just got the
drivers from Dell for this card and it turns out that they have been
statically compiled for a specific version of the kernel. I need to use
the raid array as a boot device (which the driver allows) but I don't
have a
At 06:03 AM 2/29/2000, Manuel Fernandes wrote:
Hi All
Sorry that I am bothering you about this but I am a little lost and a
little desperate. I have an new AMD athlon + RAID 0 on it. We have been
using raid0 since about 1996 or 1997 and I have just changed the setting
to use the new RAID which
With the possibility of beeing wrong, I would assume you would need to
patch the kernel for 2.2.14 if you want to use raidtools-0.90. Check out
the patch at:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.14-B1
Regards
Henrik
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, zharn2 wrote:
ok ill looked and
I've run about 100 hours of benchmarks for the last days, and I'll say the
following: chunksize is probably meaningless on raid1 if my data is
anything close to consistent, and so (or therefore?) is supplying -Rstripe
to mke2fs. The block-size, however, is 100% significant. I've got the
simple
/proc/rd/ relevant information:
* DAC960 RAID Driver Version 2.2.4 of 23 August 1999 *
Copyright 1998-1999 by Leonard N. Zubkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configuring Mylex DAC960PG PCI RAID Controller
Firmware Version: 4.06-0-08, Channels: 1, Memory Size: 4MB
PCI Bus: 0, Device: 10,
James, I've run a whole truckload of benchmarks on raid1 with varying
chunksizes on three different kernels, and on a plain disk. I'm about to
publish some of the stuff, but I'm wondering very hard why is it that the
readbalancing test showed _awful_ numbers on tiotest 0.21 and great
numbers on
On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, Johan Ekenberg wrote:
0.90. Every server has a Raid-5 array consisting of 5 large IBM scsi disks +
one spare. It works like a charm, extremely fast and no trouble at all with
How fast are the IBM disks? We're using Quantums here and they suck!
Software-RAID during
[ Tuesday, February 29, 2000 ] Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Peter Pregler wrote:
All is fine but during reconstruction I get a few syslog-messages that I
simply cannot believe are true. The message in question are:
Feb 12 11:31:52 kludge kernel: md: serializing
0.90. Every server has a Raid-5 array consisting of 5 large IBM
scsi disks +
one spare. It works like a charm, extremely fast and no trouble
at all with
How fast are the IBM disks? We're using Quantums here and they suck!
I haven't done any actual, documented testing, but they're the
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Rottler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 1:43 AM
To: Linux RAID
Subject: Re: ask help RAID1, 2 SCSI Drive, RedHat6.1
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 05:40:11PM -0600, George Liu wrote:
This is a simple question but is
[ Tuesday, February 29, 2000 ] Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
I've got the simple scripts I used to do the benchmarks here and if
somebody wants to have a look, feel free.
go ahead and mail them to the list as attachments. Might make for
more scripts to shove into tiotest/funnyscripts/
James
i tried this but mkraid still gives the same error of "a maximum of 12
disks is supported."
i set MD_SB_DISKS_WORDS to 480 to give me 15 disks.
does anyone have more detailed instructions?
looking in parser.c i see where that should have worked, but i guess i'm
missing something. it parses down
[ Tuesday, February 29, 2000 ] Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
James, I've run a whole truckload of benchmarks on raid1 with varying
chunksizes on three different kernels, and on a plain disk. I'm about to
publish some of the stuff, but I'm wondering very hard why is it that the
readbalancing
[ Tuesday, February 29, 2000 ] Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
/proc/rd/ relevant information:
* DAC960 RAID Driver Version 2.2.4 of 23 August 1999 *
Copyright 1998-1999 by Leonard N. Zubkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configuring Mylex DAC960PG PCI RAID Controller
Firmware Version:
The sample /etc/raidtab is different in the HOWTO compared to the sample
/etc/raidtab given in version 0.9 of the raidtools.
I got the 2.2.14 kernel patch and 0.90 version of the raidtools from
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/
I also picked up the latest version of the Software
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 11:40:24AM -0800, Brian Lavender wrote:
persistent-superblock 1
~~~
unrecognized option peristent-superblock
detected error on line 9:
peristent-superblock1
~~
Could this be a typo??? ;-)
Thomas
I created the /dev/md0 and I compiled the kernel to pick up the devices
automatically, but it looks as if dmesg indicates that something did not
work right. Also, what sort of entries do I put in my /etc/fstab?
Here is my dmesg output. It looks as if it is looking for a md-personality-3
James Manning wrote:
[ Tuesday, February 29, 2000 ] Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
/proc/rd/ relevant information:
* DAC960 RAID Driver Version 2.2.4 of 23 August 1999 *
Copyright 1998-1999 by Leonard N. Zubkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configuring Mylex DAC960PG PCI RAID Controller
[ Tuesday, February 29, 2000 ] Brian Lavender wrote:
mammoth:/# mkraid /dev/md0
unrecognized option peristent-superblock
Try using a spell checker :)
James
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 15:41:23 -0500
From: James Manning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ Tuesday, February 29, 2000 ] Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
/proc/rd/ relevant information:
* DAC960 RAID Driver Version 2.2.4 of 23 August 1999 *
Copyright 1998-1999 by Leonard N.
The sample raidconf will work.
George
Brian Lavender wrote:
The sample /etc/raidtab is different in the HOWTO compared to the sample
/etc/raidtab given in version 0.9 of the raidtools.
I got the 2.2.14 kernel patch and 0.90 version of the raidtools from
Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
James, I've run a whole truckload of benchmarks on raid1 with varying
chunksizes on three different kernels, and on a plain disk. I'm about to
publish some of the stuff, but I'm wondering very hard why is it that the
readbalancing test showed _awful_ numbers
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 10:14:35AM -0800, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
I think you've got them mixed up. It makes the most sense to be able to
boot from a RAID1 (mirror), next most to be able to boot from LINEAR, and
the least ammount of sense to be able to boot from a RAID0 or RAID5, because
of
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, James Manning wrote:
[ Tuesday, February 29, 2000 ] Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
/proc/rd/ relevant information:
* DAC960 RAID Driver Version 2.2.4 of 23 August 1999 *
Copyright 1998-1999 by Leonard N. Zubkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configuring Mylex
Perhaps if you also modified MAX_REAL in the md_k.h file to 15, it will like more
than 12. This value is only used by raid0.
Lance.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i tried this but mkraid still gives the same error of "a maximum of 12
disks is supported."
i set MD_SB_DISKS_WORDS to 480 to give me
Hi all,
I'm trying to add mirroring RAID to an existing partition. Is this possible?
It appears to me that when I do mkraid I'm going to kill the existing data.
Is there no way to tell it to use my exisiting data in a new RAID seting and
sync it to the new partition(s)?
Thank,
--Rainer
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Rottler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 2:44 PM
To: Linux RAID
Subject: Re: ask help RAID1, 2 SCSI Drive, RedHat6.1
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 10:14:35AM -0800, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
I think you've got them mixed up.
[cc'ed to linux-raid]
Dominick,
I got it working!
I went through and made sure that I had raid1 compiled directly in the
kernel along with ramdisk. I don't know if ramdisk is required, but I put
it in there. I also threw in the other modules that were listed below the
different raid levels in
29 matches
Mail list logo
