Re: I'm installling a system

2000-06-23 Thread Michael
> > True. If fact, you don't need floppies (except maybe a boot floppy) heh... heh also true! But my balls aren't quite that big. I like to be able to boot the system after I make one of the "little" mistakes. Having a raid kernel and all the tools on a floppy make it easier for me to sl

Re: I'm installling a system

2000-06-23 Thread phil
True. If fact, you don't need floppies (except maybe a boot floppy) if you don't mind losing a partition. I.e., have a regular partition for the initial install, form the raid from the other partitions, copy the files over (cp -a /usr /home ..) to the raid, update the raid's /etc/fstab, then re

Re: I'm installling a system

2000-06-23 Thread Michael
> If you're only installing RAID "later", you must realize that you > will not be able to apply RAID to the existing data on your drives; > you will only be able to 'raidify' empty partitions, unless you > reinstall RedHat and use their new HA Disk Druid capabilities. > That is an oversimplifica

Re: raid.lilo patch works (boot/root on RAID1), but no labels on mirror

2000-06-23 Thread Doug Ledford
Scott McDermott wrote: > > LILO is stock RH 6.2 build (which includes lilo.raid and other patches > according to the .spec) > > lilo.conf: > > boot= /dev/md0 > image = /boot/blah > label = something > root= /dev/md0 > read-only > > boot and r

RE: raid.lilo patch works (boot/root on RAID1), but no labelson mirror

2000-06-23 Thread Dave Meythaler
Try adding a "default" line to your lilo.conf and see if that fixes the problem. There is a bug with the lilo that ships with RH6.2 and this seems to workaround it. -Original Message- From: Scott McDermott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 11:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROT

raid.lilo patch works (boot/root on RAID1), but no labels on mirror

2000-06-23 Thread Scott McDermott
LILO is stock RH 6.2 build (which includes lilo.raid and other patches according to the .spec) lilo.conf: boot= /dev/md0 image = /boot/blah label = something root= /dev/md0 read-only boot and root are both on /dev/md0 which is sda1 and sdb1.

RE: Installation of RAID

2000-06-23 Thread Gregory Leblanc
> -Original Message- > From: Dimitri SZAJMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 7:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Installation of RAID > > Hi this is me again I have a last question : > > So I'm gonna install monday a linux RH 6.

RE: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performance

2000-06-23 Thread Gregory Leblanc
> -Original Message- > From: Hugh Bragg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 12:36 AM > To: Gregory Leblanc > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performance > [snip] > > > What version of raidtools should I use against a stock 2.2.16 > >

RE: I'm installling a system

2000-06-23 Thread Diegmueller, Jason (I.T. Dept)
After installation you can: : #1 - Add new hard drive (two for RAID5) : #2 - Create failed disk RAID1 or RAID5 : #3 - Create file system on RAID1 or RAID5 : #4 - Boot from rescue disk (must have RAID kernel on it) : #5 - Copy old non-RAID to new RAID using afio or cpio : #6 - Reboot to new RAID (c

Re: I'm installling a system

2000-06-23 Thread Mike Black
You can create an emergency boot disk (minus modules) very easily with: cat /vmlinuz >/dev/fd0 That will be identical to booting off your hard drive. I used to use that until lilo started recognizing RAID and I still keep one around in case the boot gets hosed.

Re: Software RAID 5 problem due broken disk to substitute

2000-06-23 Thread Morten Bøgeskov
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Andrea Ferraris wrote: >My problem is that /dev/hdc of my PC is broken (the 1st IDE disk of the 2nd >channel) and I had to replace it with /dev/hde (it is an ATA/66 disk with a >Promise controller, that can't become /dev/hdc). > >Please, if you can, reply also to my address,

Installation of RAID

2000-06-23 Thread Dimitri SZAJMAN
Hi this is me again I have a last question : So I'm gonna install monday a linux RH 6.2. The computer will have 2 UW2 SCSI HDD (let's say HDD1 and HDD2, both 9Gb) and I want to do software RAID 1. Do I have something specific to do when installing my RH ? Should I say somewhere that I want a

Software RAID 5 problem due broken disk to substitute

2000-06-23 Thread Andrea Ferraris
My problem is that /dev/hdc of my PC is broken (the 1st IDE disk of the 2nd channel) and I had to replace it with /dev/hde (it is an ATA/66 disk with a Promise controller, that can't become /dev/hdc). Please, if you can, reply also to my address, because I'm not subscribed to the list. The inte

Re: Question about RAID disks

2000-06-23 Thread Marco Shaw
The 1GB won't be "lost". You can still mirror the 9GB onto the 10GB, then you can use the leftover 1GB for another non-RAID partition. Marco -- > From: Dimitri SZAJMAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Question about RAID disks > Date: June 2

Re: I'm installling a system

2000-06-23 Thread Mike Black
Well - you can upgrade to a RAID1 or RAID5 (sort of). After installation you can: #1 - Add new hard drive (two for RAID5) #2 - Create failed disk RAID1 or RAID5 #3 - Create file system on RAID1 or RAID5 #4 - Boot from rescue disk (must have RAID kernel on it) #5 - Copy old non-RAID to new RAID us

Re: I'm installling a system

2000-06-23 Thread Marco Shaw
If you're only installing RAID "later", you must realize that you will not be able to apply RAID to the existing data on your drives; you will only be able to 'raidify' empty partitions, unless you reinstall RedHat and use their new HA Disk Druid capabilities. Marco -- > From: Dimitri SZ

I'm installling a system

2000-06-23 Thread Dimitri SZAJMAN
Hi ! I'm installing a RH 6.2 linux system. Right now I have only one hdd and I will add software Raid later. Is it possible ? Can I install the system now and add the second HDD and the software Raid later ? Must I take special cares now for installing the system ? Thanks! ___ Dimi

Question about RAID disks

2000-06-23 Thread Dimitri SZAJMAN
Hi, I have in a server a 9 Gb UW SCSI disk. I would like to install RAID on it. Software RAID. Do you know what new disk should I buy ? Must it be exactly the same ? Or can I buy like a 10 Gb UW SCSI dans 1 Gb will be lost ? Thank you ! ___ Dimitri SZAJMAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://

Re: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performance

2000-06-23 Thread Hugh Bragg
Gregory Leblanc wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hugh Bragg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 5:04 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performance > > > > Patch http://www.icon.fi/~mak/raid1/raid1readbalance-2.2.