On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
2) If I do, will it still broken unless I apply the "2.2.16combo" patch?
3) If it will, then how do I resolve the problem with the md.c hunk failing
with "2.2.16combo"?
If I remember correctly, 2.2.16combo was there to make it possible to use
Sure enough, you've got an old version of the RAID code. Hop over to
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/ . I've had no problems running
Alan Cox's 2.2.17pre13 code with the 2.2.17 patch from Ingo. The raidtools
0.90 that you have should work fine, if you have any concerns just
Hi,
I am tearing my hair out over this stuff (I should have mentioned that I am
completely new to not only RAID but Linux in general). This is the first
task I have been given in my new job - talk about being thrown in at the
deep end! :)
I've written to many lists for help with this and
On 08-Aug-00 octave klaba wrote:
I will try to play with next time the server crash. Also maybe it is
because of the reconstruction is done in the same time that the fsck.
I think you answered your questions. If the raid ist reconstructing and
gets changes bu fsck all the time this will slow
Hi,
raiddev /dev/md0
device /dev/sda2
device /dev/sdb2
/dev/hda6 / ext2defaults1 1
/dev/hda1 /boot ext2defaults1 2
/dev/hda5
Hi,
I will try to play with next time the server crash. Also maybe it is
because of the reconstruction is done in the same time that the fsck.
I think you answered your questions. If the raid ist reconstructing and
gets changes bu fsck all the time this will slow down.
so, something is
Hello,
does anybody know how to find out about the size of a (EIDE) drives
cache if the company 'lost' the data sheet?
Thanks for your time.
Kay
--
Kay A Salzwedel
Heinz Nixdorf Institute
University of Paderborn
Germany
Hi all,
I have a up and running web server system with one SCSI 17,5 GB
disk, and I'm thinking of putting in a extra 17,5 GB disk and
build an RAID-1 array.
Questions:
* Is there a way of initializing the array without destroying data
on the first disk, so that reconstruction is commenced
-Original Message-
From: Kay Salzwedel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 5:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: disc drive cache
Hello,
does anybody know how to find out about the size of a (EIDE) drives
cache if the company 'lost' the data sheet?
hello,
could anybody tell me which of these is quicker (in performance)
sorry if this is a FAQ
until next mail B-), l8r
Peter
--
:~~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~:
: student of technical computer science :
: university of applied
-Original Message-
From: Jane Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problems booting from RAID
Hi,
I am tearing my hair out over this stuff (I should have
mentioned that I am
completely new to not only
Suppose I have a SW RAID5 over 5 disks, 9.1 G each
We are getting to a point where we need more space, but the box has no
more space. So I am wondering how I might go about upgrading the disks to
bigger capacity volumes. Suppose I insert bigger disks one by one and let
the array reconstruct.
Title: RE: bigger disks
It is possible to resize the filesystem (ext2), but it is NOT possible to resize the raid 5.
There has been some experimental work done in the area of resizing raid 5 arrays (and raid 0), but it is a risky proposition and never was completed.
You either need to 1)
or is alan cox's 2.2.17pre series recommended nowadays?
-tcl.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, tc lewis wrote:
sorry for mailing, but my HOWTO is rather outdated.
where's the latest raid stuff for linux kernel 2.2?
ie: the patch, and raidtools.
i'm upgrading from 2.2.14 to 2.2.16. is the
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Waldmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Where to get uptodate raidtool/kernelpatches (2.2.1x) ?
Sure enough, you've got an old version of the RAID code.
Hop over to
15 matches
Mail list logo
