Re: FW: Dream RAID System (fwd)

1999-10-14 Thread Marc Merlin
On mar, oct 12, 1999 at 10:05:25 -0600, Chris M wrote: What do you mean "SCSI logic to handle drives..." With a safety (no idea how you write this) backplane, a disk shelf can communicate with the SCSI card and physically turn off a failed disk for instance. When some SCSI disks go

Re: FW: Dream RAID System (fwd)

1999-10-13 Thread John Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Christopher E. Brown wrote: ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- MachineMB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec

Re: FW: Dream RAID System (fwd)

1999-10-13 Thread Jan Edler
Did something change? The raidzone Smartcans we have are just nice packages for ATA drives so you can do software raid. One ATA controller per drive, with nice slim hot-swap carriers. Jan Edler NEC Research Institute

Re: FW: Dream RAID System (fwd)

1999-10-12 Thread Christopher E. Brown
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 14:03:11 -0400 (EDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kenneth Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Dream RAID System On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Kenneth Cornetet wrote: Hardware RAID does not necessarily preclude speed. I put

Re: FW: Dream RAID System (fwd)

1999-10-12 Thread jlewis
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Christopher E. Brown wrote: ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- MachineMB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU

Re: FW: Dream RAID System (fwd)

1999-10-12 Thread Marc Merlin
On mar, oct 12, 1999 at 10:19:00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: automatic rebuilds using hot spares without having to roll my own scripts to do so I'm pretty sure software RAID5 will rebuild parity on a spare disk if it takes another drive off-line ability to boot from a RAID5 (though

Re: FW: Dream RAID System (fwd)

1999-10-12 Thread jlewis
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Marc Merlin wrote: ability to boot from a RAID5 (though AFAIK, lilo can boot from software mirrored partitions now, no?) Correct. Note that depending on the Raid card and the distribution, you may not be able to boot on it without bootstrapping your

Re: FW: Dream RAID System (fwd)

1999-10-12 Thread Marc Merlin
On mar, oct 12, 1999 at 11:44:23 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Though, how does the PC handle things booting up if the drive on controller 0, ID 0 has gone bad? I expect this is another case where I don't think it will boot, unless you have a boot floppy as a backup that will boot on the

Re: FW: Dream RAID System (fwd)

1999-10-12 Thread Chris M
There's nothing (that I know of) stopping anyone from buying Intel Astor/AstorII/Cabrillo-C server chassis and making use of their hot-swap bays without hardware RAID. The Astor chassis are surprising cheap too. True, but a real disk shelf with dual power supply, diagnostic LEDs, and

Re: FW: Dream RAID System (fwd)

1999-10-12 Thread Jakob Østergaard
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 08:50:26PM -0700, Marc Merlin wrote: On mar, oct 12, 1999 at 11:44:23 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Though, how does the PC handle things booting up if the drive on controller 0, ID 0 has gone bad? I expect this is another case where I don't think it will boot,

Re: FW: Dream RAID System (fwd)

1999-10-12 Thread jlewis
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, [iso-8859-1] Jakob Østergaard wrote: With IDE drives, you can (at least on a few newer BIOSes where I've tried it) set your drives to ``autodetect'' so that the BIOS won't complain if one drive is missing. Then, with identical /boot partitions on both drives, and the