Hello,
I just upgraded to 2.2.10 and I am unable to find the kernel patch to make
raid work (RH 6.0)Can someone point me in the right direction?
Thanks...
James
Fred Reimer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 06 Jul 1999, Christoph Martin wrote:
> > You can apply the 2.2.6 patches to 2.2.10. But it is not working
> > correctly. Normal operation is ok, but if a raid comes out of sync and
> > need a resync (like when you reboot without a proper shutdown), this
> > would fa
> > You can apply the 2.2.6 patches to 2.2.10. But it is not working
> > correctly. Normal operation is ok, but if a raid comes out of sync and
> > need a resync (like when you reboot without a proper shutdown), this
> > would fail.
This doesn't in fact have anything to do with RAID0, and anyway
Surely tested, but "production quality" depends on your application.
I don't believe it has been described by the developers as "Production
Quality" "but your mileage may vary"..
James
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Fred Reimer wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jul 1999, Christoph Martin wrote:
> > You can ap
On Tue, 06 Jul 1999, Christoph Martin wrote:
> You can apply the 2.2.6 patches to 2.2.10. But it is not working
> correctly. Normal operation is ok, but if a raid comes out of sync and
> need a resync (like when you reboot without a proper shutdown), this
> would fail.
>
> I have a 2.2.10 with 2
That would be a good idea, if there is a problem with 2.2.10 then
confusing it with raid isn't ideal
I don't think people understood my previous message which appears to have
started this thread... I was only really wanting more information
about the development status rather than rushin
Christoph Martin wrote:
> Ingo Molnar talked about working on the patches for 2.2.10 and that he
> fixed the problem with resync, but he did not yet release the code.
Perhaps he is "waiting" for the fs-corruption bug in 2.2.10 to go away?
René
Robert Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I'm wanting to use the latest kernel with raid patches and I'm new to
> the mailing list... Is raid with 2.2.10 a matter of applying the 2.2.6
> raid patches, and adding that code above? What are the "AC" patches?
> Is the fix in the second parag
John E. Adams wrote:
>
> >> Tom Livingston wrote:
> >>
> >>> As others have pointed out recently on this list, you can get raid working
> >>> with a 2.2.10 kernel. Ingo posted a fix, which involves changing just one
> >>> line.
> >>
> >> I wrote:
> >> The fix is only one line, BUT that one line
John E. Adams wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
> > Christopher E. Browne wrote:
> > So if I am distilling the correct data here, one patches 2.2.1
> > with the latest 2.2.6 raid patch, ignores the rejects, and cheges
> > those to lines and then has a working raid system?
Yes, that's how it works for m
>> Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>>> As others have pointed out recently on this list, you can get raid working
>>> with a 2.2.10 kernel. Ingo posted a fix, which involves changing just one
>>> line.
>>
>> I wrote:
>> The fix is only one line, BUT that one line occurs TWICE. Change both
>> occurr
On Sun, 4 Jul 1999, John E. Adams wrote:
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> >As others have pointed out recently on this list, you can get raid working
> >with a 2.2.10 kernel. Ingo posted a fix, which involves changing just one
> >line.
>
> The fix is only one line, BUT that one line occurs TWICE.
Tom Livingston wrote:
>As others have pointed out recently on this list, you can get raid working
>with a 2.2.10 kernel. Ingo posted a fix, which involves changing just one
>line.
The fix is only one line, BUT that one line occurs TWICE. Change both
occurrences of 'current->priority = 0' to '
13 matches
Mail list logo
