Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-25 Thread Gregory Leblanc
Thomas Waldmann wrote: > > > > Well, although all of reiser/ext3-fs and raid are very fine stuff, I would > > > definitely vote for SW-RAID to be preferred (if they can´t be included > > > alltogether due to incompatibilities) > > ! > > > Thankfully, they can and will be living happily together

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-25 Thread Thomas Waldmann
> > Well, although all of reiser/ext3-fs and raid are very fine stuff, I would > > definitely vote for SW-RAID to be preferred (if they can´t be included > > alltogether due to incompatibilities) ! > Thankfully, they can and will be living happily together, This would be, of course, the best.

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-24 Thread James Manning
&don_hat($devils_advocate); [ Monday, January 24, 2000 ] Thomas Waldmann wrote: > > I believe that Ingo realizes that no amount of last-minute cram-testing > > is going to be a real factor, it'll come down to Linus's feeling of > > how well reiser, ext3, and 0.90 raid play together. > > Well, al

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-24 Thread Thomas Waldmann
> I believe that Ingo realizes that no amount of last-minute cram-testing > is going to be a real factor, it'll come down to Linus's feeling of > how well reiser, ext3, and 0.90 raid play together. Well, although all of reiser/ext3-fs and raid are very fine stuff, I would definitely vote for SW-R

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-24 Thread Jakob Østergaard
On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 01:43:38PM +0100, Holger Kiehl wrote: > ...[snip]... > > Here is my original post from 17th January: > > On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > here is the first alpha version of the '2.4 RAID merge' patch against > > pre4-2.3.40: > > > > http://www.red

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-23 Thread Holger Kiehl
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Jakob Østergaard wrote: > > To everyone on linux-raid: > It seems improbable that the 0.90 raid stuff will go into 2.4 currently. This > is catastrophic. We need to try Ingo's patch, and give it all the testing we > can. If enough people try the patch and we can give a

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-23 Thread James Manning
[ Saturday, January 22, 2000 ] Michael wrote: > Gee, I'd like to see it in 2.2 and 2.3. I'm getting real tired of > applying the patches to new builds -- which I've been doing now for a > couple of years (like you). How stable does it need to be?? Haven't > had one break yet!!! > > Currently h

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-23 Thread James Manning
[ Saturday, January 22, 2000 ] Jakob Østergaard wrote: > It seems improbable that the 0.90 raid stuff will go into 2.4 currently. > This is catastrophic. We need to try Ingo's patch, and give it all > the testing we can. If enough people try the patch and we can give a > reasonable argument that

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-23 Thread Jakob Østergaard
On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 12:38:04AM -0500, Joseph Malicki wrote: > Is there a raid patch for 2.3 kernels? Or are they already in? I recently > tried to run 2.3.39 recently and it couldn't find my RAID array created > with RedHat 6.1.. http://people.redhat.com/mingo/ Try the ibc-ext2-raid-2.3