> > > http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
> > > let me know if you have any problems with it.
> > patch -p0 < raid-2.2.16-A0
> what source kernel ? from ftp.kernel.org ? or from /usr/src/linux of
> your distribution ?
>From kernel.org, of course. Sorry for bothering a
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> at:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
> let me know if you have any problems with it.
>
> Ingo
patch -p0 < raid-2.2.16-A0
patching file `linux/init/main.c'
Alexander Javoronkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> > at:
> > http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
> > let me know if you have any problems with it.
> patch -p0 < raid-2.2.16-A0
what source ker
I use:
>
> ftp.kernel.org
> /pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/ide-2.2.16/ide.2.2.16-pre7.2509.patch.gz
>
> Thanks,
>
> Doug Egan
>
i have a patch for 2.2.16 that has both the latest ide patch (2.2.16-pre7)
in it as well as the 2.2.16-A0 raid patch. you can download it at:
> > I hate to bother the list with this, but...I have been unable to get
> > Redhat 6.1/2.2.16+raid-2.2.16-A0 working with Root RAID1. I
> > have read just
You don't need initrd. See the cook book on the Linux Documentation
Project web site.
Boot+Root+Raid+lilo howto
just follow the directions
Is there a new RAID patch for the kernel 2.2.16?
Douglas Egan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pardon my confusion.
>
> I want to move from 2.2.14 raid5 with IDE patches to support Promise
> Ultra66 to the 2.2.16 version.
>
> I have the raid patches, but I am confused about which ide patch to
> take.
>
> Should I use:
>
> ftp.kernel.org
> /pub
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Matthew DeFoor wrote:
> now!
> sdb6's event counter: 0006
> sda6's event counter: 0006
> request_module[md-personality-3]: Root fs not mounted
Seems to me you have raid1 compiled as a module. That's OK if you really
know initrd stuff, but personally I prefer to compi
[Matthew DeFoor]
> I hate to bother the list with this, but...I have been unable to get
> Redhat 6.1/2.2.16+raid-2.2.16-A0 working with Root RAID1.
>
> image=/boot/bzImage
> label=linux
> initrd=/boot/initrd-2.2.16.RAID.img
> read-only
> root=/dev/md0
>
> request_
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 12:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 2.2.16 RAID patch
>
> > the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-f
> the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> at:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
> let me know if you have any problems with it.
>
I hate to bother the list with this, but...I have been unable to get
Redhat 6.1/2.2.16+raid-2
Pardon my confusion.
I want to move from 2.2.14 raid5 with IDE patches to support Promise
Ultra66 to the 2.2.16 version.
I have the raid patches, but I am confused about which ide patch to
take.
Should I use:
ftp.kernel.org
/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/ide-2.2.16/ide.2.2.16-pre7.2509.p
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 15:50:09 -0400, Ed Schernau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 04:36:39 -0400, Edward Schernau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >> Could this be changed to 2.2.16-raid for future versions or should I
>> >> better get in touch with kernel-packag
2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: raid-patch for kernel 2.2.16
hallo,
because there is a security-bug in the linux kernel for
versions through 2.2.15 i want to upgrade my kernel-versions
to 2.2.16.
until now my servers run under suse 6.3, kernel 2.2.14 with
raidpatch raid-2.2.14-B1
(
hallo,
because there is a security-bug in the linux kernel for
versions through 2.2.15 i want to upgrade my kernel-versions
to 2.2.16.
until now my servers run under suse 6.3, kernel 2.2.14 with
raidpatch raid-2.2.14-B1
(from "http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches")
and raidtool-0.90-3.
Marc Haber wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 04:36:39 -0400, Edward Schernau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> Could this be changed to 2.2.16-raid for future versions or should I
> >> better get in touch with kernel-package's maintainer?
> >
> >Or just get a real kernel from kernel.org.
>
> Debian
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 04:36:39 -0400, Edward Schernau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Could this be changed to 2.2.16-raid for future versions or should I
>> better get in touch with kernel-package's maintainer?
>
>Or just get a real kernel from kernel.org.
Debian's kernel package relies on "real" ke
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 09:02:42 +0200 (CEST), Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Marc Haber wrote:
>> A kernel patched this way doesn't build with Debian's kernel package.
>> Complains "The version number 2.2.16-RAID is not all lowercase. Stop."
>>
>> Could this be changed
Marc Haber wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 14:34:59 +0200 (CEST), Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> >at:
> >
> >http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
> >
> >let me know if you have any pr
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Marc Haber wrote:
> A kernel patched this way doesn't build with Debian's kernel package.
> Complains "The version number 2.2.16-RAID is not all lowercase. Stop."
>
> Could this be changed to 2.2.16-raid for future versions or should I
> better get in touch with kernel-pack
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 14:34:59 +0200 (CEST), Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
>at:
>
>http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
>let me know if you have any problems with it.
A kernel patched thi
> the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> at:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
> let me know if you have any problems with it.
>
Should CONFIG_AUTODETECT_RAID be defined in md.c? I can manually start
the raid and have it s
> the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> at:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
> let me know if you have any problems with it.
>
What version of raidtools should be used? Is raidtools-0.90-5 sufficient?
Thanks! - mattd
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > ouch, right - i've uploaded a new patch. (this problem was caused by a bug
> > in creating the patch)
>
> Much nicer, patched cleanly, thanks. Now time to see if it compiles
> and works happily. ;)
it should :-) the problem was in creating t
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > Didn't appear to patch cleanly against a clean 2.2.16 tree, error
> > was in md.c and left a rather large .rej file..
>
> ouch, right - i've uploaded a new patch. (this problem was caused by a bug
>
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Didn't appear to patch cleanly against a clean 2.2.16 tree, error
> was in md.c and left a rather large .rej file..
ouch, right - i've uploaded a new patch. (this problem was caused by a bug
in creating the patch)
Ingo
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> at:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
> let me know if you have any problems with it.
Didn't appear to patch cleanly against a cle
the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
at:
http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
let me know if you have any problems with it.
Ingo
Hi there,
WARNING: IANAKH (I am not a kernel hacker)
I wanted to upgrade some of my machines to kernel 2.2.16, so I set about
trying to get mingo's patch for 2.2.15 to apply cleanly to 2.2.16.
WARNING #2: I have practically zero experience with diff -c or patch, but
I thought I would attempt i
At 12:07 PM 3/1/2000, Konstandinos A. Saipas wrote:
>Sorry for asking for the same thing but accidentaly I erased the
>email that had a url for raid patches for 2.2.14.
>I am talking about the proper patch that is needed to use raid-tools 0.90
>with kernel 2.2.14. ( I am using rh 6.1 ).
>
>Thank y
Sorry for asking for the same thing but accidentaly I erased the
email that had a url for raid patches for 2.2.14.
I am talking about the proper patch that is needed to use raid-tools 0.90
with kernel 2.2.14. ( I am using rh 6.1 ).
Thank you in advance,
Konstandinos A. Saipas
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Hello everybody.
I'm using Raid1 with kernel 2.2.13. But I need to install kernel 2.0.34 now.
Where can I get the raid patch for kernel 2.0.34?
Thanks in advance.
[ Wednesday, January 19, 2000 ] Innovation Strategies SL wrote:
> I'm using Raid1 with kernel 2.2.13. But I need to install kernel 2.0.34 now.
> Where can I get the raid patch for kernel 2.0.34?
I only see raid patches going back to 2.0.35 at
kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/
As far as I know there are no newer patches, I've used the 2.2.11 patches
with 2.2.13 successfully, ignore the rejects.
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Sebastian Lemke wrote:
> Hello everbody,
>
> a few month ago I patched my Linux 2.2.11 Kernel with the Raidpatch0145
> und Raidtools found at
> ftp://ftp
On Jan 4, 10:03am, Sebastian Lemke wrote:
} Subject: Raid Patch
> Hello everbody,
Good morning.
> a few month ago I patched my Linux 2.2.11 Kernel with the Raidpatch0145
> und Raidtools found at
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha/.
> But now I mentioned that
At 10:03 AM 1/4/2000 +0100, Sebastian Lemke wrote:
>Hello everbody,
>
>a few month ago I patched my Linux 2.2.11 Kernel with the Raidpatch0145
>und Raidtools found at
>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha/.
>But now I mentioned that there is a new Kernel 2.2.13 but the Raid
>Patches a
Hello everbody,
a few month ago I patched my Linux 2.2.11 Kernel with the Raidpatch0145
und Raidtools found at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha/.
But now I mentioned that there is a new Kernel 2.2.13 but the Raid
Patches are not available for this kernelversion. Can I use the "ol
M.C. wrote:
> ...
>Is there something I missed, did I use the wrong kernel patch version or
>what?... This is really starting to give me an ulcer now...
You missed the failing part of the patch concerning fs.h.
Add the following code to include/linux/fs.h and it will compile
static in
I have heard everyone talking about successfully applying the 2.2.6
raid-kernel patch to a 2.2.9 kernel, which would be great for me as I have
heard they have made the SMP code more stable and optimized.
I patch the kernel in a standard fashion... (from /usr/src/linux)
patch -p1 < ../raid0145-
> Steve Costaras wrote:
> >
> > I saw that 2.2.10 was just released, I know it's rather early but was
> > wondering if anyone
> > tested to see if the rebuild problem was fixed?
> >
> > Also, any word on if the the raid patches are now included in the
general
> > kernel release?
>
> I would seriou
Hello Steve, There has not been an inclusion of the alpha
drivers into this kernel release . I haven't attempted to
apply the 2.2.6 raid patches (& I probably won't) to this
kernel . Hth, JimL
On Mon, 14 Jun 1999, Steve Costaras wrote:
> I saw that 2.2.10 wa
Steve Costaras wrote:
>
> I saw that 2.2.10 was just released, I know it's rather early but was
> wondering if anyone
> tested to see if the rebuild problem was fixed?
>
> Also, any word on if the the raid patches are now included in the general
> kernel release?
I would seriously doubt if thes
I saw that 2.2.10 was just released, I know it's rather early but was
wondering if anyone
tested to see if the rebuild problem was fixed?
Also, any word on if the the raid patches are now included in the general
kernel release?
Steve
--
Steve Costaras
John Barbee wrote:
> I'm running Redhat 6 which comes with the 2.2.5 kernel.
>
> Does that mean I should be using the raid0145-2.2.6 patch from ftp.kernel.org?
>
> How do I incorporate this patch into the kernel. I couldn't find any
> directions. The patch starts with a lot of +'s and -'s. I p
I'm running Redhat 6 which comes with the 2.2.5 kernel.
Does that mean I should be using the raid0145-2.2.6 patch from ftp.kernel.org?
How do I incorporate this patch into the kernel. I couldn't find any
directions. The patch starts with a lot of +'s and -'s. I presume those
mark the differen
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> I made a small kernel and raidtools patch to mark a specific device as dirty
> (failure).
>
> Suppose you have as a /etc/raidtab
> raiddev /dev/md4
> chunk-size128
> raid-level1
> nr-raid-disks
This is exactly the idea I suggested the other day... I hope it meets with
everone's approval! it also could be used to force the system to move
data off a SPARE disk if I want to keep the same disk spare unless it's
being used for neatness
I realise that it leaves an inconsistant files
Hi,
I made a small kernel and raidtools patch to mark a specific device as dirty
(failure).
Suppose you have as a /etc/raidtab
raiddev /dev/md4
chunk-size128
raid-level1
nr-raid-disks 2
nr-spare-disks1
device
there is an archive of this list at www.linuxhq.com/lnxlists/
i suggest you go there and look for the empty_zero_page fix. it was
mentioned last week.
welcome to linux. and remember- this is not about anti-microsoft, it is
about pro-freedom. have fun in your brave new world.
al
"so don't tell us
Hello,
got the following problem compiling Kernel 2.0.36 with the
raid0145-19990128-2.0.36 patch file:
when I run 'make zImage' I get the following Error listed below (without
application of the patch there is no error, I get a new kernel).
If I apply the raid0145-19990128-2.0.36 patch everythi
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Scott Smyth wrote:
> I am interested in trying LVM for linux and would like to know
> the extent of the lvm module included in the alpha RAID patch:
> is it the full lvm implementation? will the lvm tools that are
> released with lvm work with this lvm code?
&
I am interested in trying LVM for linux and would like to know
the extent of the lvm module included in the alpha RAID patch:
is it the full lvm implementation? will the lvm tools that are
released with lvm work with this lvm code?
My point of reference is: http://linux.msede.com/lvm/
Thanks
On Fri, 27 Nov 1998, Enbo Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When can I get the new RAID patch for 2.0.36 kernel? or How can I use the
> current patch for 2.0.35 on my 2.0.36 kernel?
unless you know how to resolve a rejected patchfile, you should wait for
the next release that does 2.0.36
Hi,
When can I get the new RAID patch for 2.0.36 kernel? or How can I use the
current patch for 2.0.35 on my 2.0.36 kernel?
I am waiting for it. Please give me an answer.
THANX!
Hi,
Will you please tell me how to use RAID patch 1110 on my 2.0.36-pre-patch-22
? It always fails on some files (sys.c etc.). I've try two patch order:
patch kernel to 2.0.36-pre first then patch RAID; and patch RAID first then
patch 2.0.36-pre. The result is same.
Please help me!
Waitin
55 matches
Mail list logo
