the old swap on raid question

2000-07-03 Thread Michael
The risk to using swap on raid is that resync and swap operations can not go on at the same time so that if the swap raid set has been damaged and is resyncing, swap can not be allowed. There are several workaround scripts that detect the resync and allow it to finish before proceeding. Would

Re: linear mode RAID question

1999-09-13 Thread Brian Bell
Post your /etc/raidtab You may have a spelling oops hidden in there, according to the error message :) "Stoica, Dragos" wrote: > Hi! > I'm trying to create a RAID volume in linear mode from two 18Gb partitions > on different HDD's. I followed the instructions in Software RAID HOWTO and I > al

Raid Question :)

1999-09-07 Thread Brian Bell
OK, no matter what I do or with any combo of drives I get this. I am running Mandrake 6.0 w/ kernel 2.2.12 (tried 2.2.9) with MD support and raid1 compiled in. Tried the mandrake rpm raid tools and raid tools 19990824 The /etc/raidtab is exactly like the howtos and examples are. I am trying to

Re: Raid question

1999-08-12 Thread Bart-Jan Vrielink
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Thomas James Mackie III wrote: [NON-Text Body part not included] This error really means: see syslog for more information. I asume this is just a test setup, because using raid0 on two ide devices on the same controller is not very useful, it will kill any performance and

Re: Raid question

1999-08-10 Thread jakob
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 02:52:52AM -0700, Thomas James Mackie III wrote: > OK have two IDE 20gig I'm trying to do Raid 0 > /dev/hdh1 > /dev/hdg1 > I did a mkraid --really-force /dev/md0 and I get mkraid: aborted ... I did the >/etc/raidtab and it still fails. What is the procedure. This is a new

Raid question

1999-08-10 Thread Thomas James Mackie III
OK have two IDE 20gig I'm trying to do Raid 0 /dev/hdh1 /dev/hdg1 I did a mkraid --really-force /dev/md0 and I get mkraid: aborted ... I did the /etc/raidtab and it still fails. What is the procedure. This is a new system and there is nothing on the 20gig drives. Thank you,Thomas J. Mackie I

Re: General RAID question...

1999-06-03 Thread Mike Frisch
Tom Livingston wrote: > Linux software raid is partition based, so you don't have to lose that > space. When you sub in the 9gig for the 4gig, just make one partition the > same size as all the other disks, and another partition that will hold the > ~5gigs. Of course, this 5gigs isn't included i

RE: General RAID question...

1999-06-02 Thread Tom Livingston
> I am planning on building a small SCSI RAID array (using software RAID) > for my home Linux server. Suppose I have 4 of the same drive (perhaps > 4GB drives). What happens in a year or two when one of the drives fails > and I am unable to find a matching replacement? Linux software raid is pa

General RAID question...

1999-06-02 Thread Mike Frisch
I am planning on building a small SCSI RAID array (using software RAID) for my home Linux server. Suppose I have 4 of the same drive (perhaps 4GB drives). What happens in a year or two when one of the drives fails and I am unable to find a matching replacement? Sure, I could sub in a 9GB drive