Re: root owned writable files under /sys

2010-11-18 Thread Or Gerlitz
Jack, I didn't see any further response on the matter, I got customers to complain on why the port_trigger sysfs entry is world writable and I wonder why isn't this pushed upstream, once you guys do that we can fix the permissions. Also they noted that the diag_counters entry has the same

Re: building RDMA perftests with g++

2010-11-18 Thread Ido Shamai
Hey Ed , I'm Ido , perftest maintainer , I will check the issue now , and report you back. In general , every c program can be compiled with g++ ? Ido On 11/18/2010 5:20 AM, i...@celticblues.com wrote: I have what is probably a silly question If I compile the rdma_bw example from

Re: rdma_lat whos

2010-11-18 Thread Ido Shamai
Hello Or , I will check the issue now. The latest git tree is available at git://git.openfabrics.org/~shamoya/perftest.git , I've just checked it and it works. Will get back to you soon Ido On 11/17/2010 1:30 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: Or Gerlitz wrote: Now, Jack, using this patch, I could get

Re: rdma_lat whos

2010-11-18 Thread Or Gerlitz
Ido Shamai wrote: The latest git tree is available at git://git.openfabrics.org/~shamoya/perftest.git I've just checked it and it works. Indeed its available but not through the ofa gitweb @ http://git.openfabrics.org/git/ so commits you are doing can't be browsed out, Vlad can help you

Re: rdma_lat whos

2010-11-18 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky
On 11/18/2010 01:44 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: Ido Shamai wrote: The latest git tree is available at git://git.openfabrics.org/~shamoya/perftest.git I've just checked it and it works. Indeed its available but not through the ofa gitweb @ http://git.openfabrics.org/git/ so commits you are doing

Re: rdma_lat whos

2010-11-18 Thread Or Gerlitz
Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote: perftest is available under: http://git.openfabrics.org/git?p=~shamoya/perftest.git;a=summary Got that, its says Unnamed repository; edit this file to name it for gitweb. and doesn't have owner, can you fix that, please? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: Support for Memory windows.

2010-11-18 Thread Romulo Goncalves
On 16/11/10 14:01, Tziporet Koren wrote: On 11/15/2010 5:06 PM, Romulo Goncalves wrote: Hello, For my PhD project I have been using RDMA over inifiniband. Until now I have used memory regions, but now I would like to also define memory windows. The steps taken are the following ones:

RE: Support for Memory windows.

2010-11-18 Thread Tziporet Koren
Is there any plans to implement it in a near future? No Tziporet -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: root owned writable files under /sys

2010-11-18 Thread Jack Morgenstein
Port trigger belongs to Yevgeny P. Please interact with him regarding this. -Jack -Original Message- From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:ogerl...@voltaire.com] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 11:55 AM To: Jack Morgenstein Cc: Sumeet Lahorani; Tziporet Koren; Roland Dreier;

Re: root owned writable files under /sys

2010-11-18 Thread Or Gerlitz
Jack Morgenstein wrote: Port trigger belongs to Yevgeny P. Please interact with him regarding this. I know, the thing is that I failed to get any response from him on the matter of pushing it upstream for long time, and this is IB related patch, so I tried to pull you on that... Yevgeny, could

RE: root owned writable files under /sys

2010-11-18 Thread Tziporet Koren
Yevgeny is going to RD next week Will see if someone can work on this here before he returns Tziporet -Original Message- From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:ogerl...@voltaire.com] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 3:03 PM To: Jack Morgenstein; Yevgeny Petrilin Cc: Sumeet Lahorani; Tziporet Koren;

Re: [PATCH 0/3] IB Netlink Interface and RDMA CM exports

2010-11-18 Thread Nir Muchtar
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 13:39 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: Well, the main reason for the module separation is to allow extensibility and independence. I don't understand how the physical location of object code has anything to do with extensibility and independence? ie what is the relevance

Re: [PATCH 0/3] IB Netlink Interface and RDMA CM exports

2010-11-18 Thread Or Gerlitz
Roland Dreier wrote: I think we should probably put this in the core module rather than creating yet another module. I don't really see what the advantage of separating netlink into its own module is. If we're going on putting the netlink code in an existing module, ib_core would fit better,

RE: RDMA with multiple read/write

2010-11-18 Thread Andrea Gozzelino
On Nov 12, 2010 06:23 PM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote: I would like to perform test about RDMA server/client about multiple reads or/and writes. Can server/client store few memory regions? If yes, how? An app can register multiple memory regions. Just call register mr for

RE: RDMA with multiple read/write

2010-11-18 Thread Hefty, Sean
-- I register a single larger memory region with rdma_reg_msgs. What are parameters in rdma_post_recv function to use these big memory regions few times? In other words, on that MR can I write/read different smaller messages? Just adjust the addr and length parameters. For example: buffer =

Re: [PATCH 0/3] IB Netlink Interface and RDMA CM exports

2010-11-18 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:23:10PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: Roland Dreier wrote: I think we should probably put this in the core module rather than creating yet another module. I don't really see what the advantage of separating netlink into its own module is. If we're going on putting

Re: mxl4 and rpcrdma: connection to 192.168.0.100:20049 on mlx4_0, memreg 5 slots 32 ird 16

2010-11-18 Thread Steve Wise
On 11/17/2010 07:12 PM, Roland Dreier wrote: Nov 15 09:39:00 node4 kernel: rpcrdma: connection to 192.168.0.100:20049 on mlx4_0, memreg 5 slots 32 ird 16 and then 5 minutes later: Nov 15 09:44:00 node4 kernel: rpcrdma: connection to 192.168.0.100:20049

dat_ep_disconnect() with ABRUPT

2010-11-18 Thread Pradeep Satyanarayana
Hi Arlin, We are seeing some issues with dat_ep_disconnect() with ABRUPT flag. In fact it appears that the ABRUPT flag seems to behave like the GRACEFUL flag. One difference between the DAT1.2 and DAT2.0 appears to be the following: In dapls_ib_disconnect() /* ABRUPT close, wait for

Re: mxl4 and rpcrdma: connection to 192.168.0.100:20049 on mlx4_0, memreg 5 slots 32 ird 16

2010-11-18 Thread Steve Wise
On 11/18/2010 11:36 AM, Steve Wise wrote: On 11/17/2010 07:12 PM, Roland Dreier wrote: Nov 15 09:39:00 node4 kernel: rpcrdma: connection to 192.168.0.100:20049 on mlx4_0, memreg 5 slots 32 ird 16 and then 5 minutes later: Nov 15 09:44:00 node4 kernel: rpcrdma: connection to

Re: dat_ep_disconnect() with ABRUPT

2010-11-18 Thread Pradeep Satyanarayana
On 11/18/2010 9:40 AM, Pradeep Satyanarayana wrote: Hi Arlin, We are seeing some issues with dat_ep_disconnect() with ABRUPT flag. In fact it appears that the ABRUPT flag seems to behave like the GRACEFUL flag. One difference between the DAT1.2 and DAT2.0 appears to be the following:

Re: [PATCH 0/3] IB Netlink Interface and RDMA CM exports

2010-11-18 Thread Roland Dreier
1. ib_netlink will not be in a different module. Instead it will be a part of ib_uverbs. Not sure what Jason thinks, but I would say ib_core -- we would want to use this independent of user verbs. - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a

memory leak in libdat2.so.2.0.0

2010-11-18 Thread King, Perry E.
Hi, I assume I am writing to the correct address.  I would like to report a memory leak in libdat2.so.2.0.0 that I noticed while using valgrind. I isolated it to an application that does not actually make any calls on libdat2.  All it does is link it in with g++ using -ldat2. I am running on