On 17/03/15 07:15, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey Iain,
On 17-03-15 01:38, Iain Paton wrote:
The eeproms are physically present on all boards as far as I can tell,
however on every olinuxino I have, they are blank from the factory (i.e.
content of every byte is 0xFF).
Yeah they are all
ons 2015-03-18 klockan 08:55 +0100 skrev Olliver Schinagl:
I'm all for common methods, but you are suggesting to use a single
dedicated page purely for the MAC address? Where is it defined which
page that is? And what about using the subsequent page for stuff like a
crc/checksum and verify
Am 18.03.2015, 08:55 Uhr, schrieb Olliver Schinagl oli...@schinagl.nl:
Hey Henrik,
On 18-03-15 08:51, Henrik Nordström wrote:
mån 2015-03-16 klockan 11:13 +0100 skrev Hans de Goede:
I see, yes using olinuxino's embedded in factory devices is a valid
reason,
so I will be happy to take
From: Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net
To: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2015, 10:17
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC] Serial number on sunxi devices
ons 2015-03-18 klockan 10:16 +0100 skrev Irgendeiner:
I don't understand why checksums and other
Hey Henrik,
On 18-03-15 08:51, Henrik Nordström wrote:
mån 2015-03-16 klockan 11:13 +0100 skrev Hans de Goede:
I see, yes using olinuxino's embedded in factory devices is a valid reason,
so I will be happy to take patches for reading the MAC from the eeprom,
we will need to do some tests to
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:12:47 +0100, Henrik Nordström
hen...@familjen-nordstrom.se wrote:
ons 2015-03-18 klockan 08:55 +0100 skrev Olliver Schinagl:
I'm all for common methods, but you are suggesting to use a single
dedicated page purely for the MAC address? Where is it defined which
ons 2015-03-18 klockan 10:16 +0100 skrev Irgendeiner:
I think that for the MAC used, sunxi must make sure that on all supported
hardware the MAC planned by the board manufacturer will be used as default.
Problem with most boards is that there is no MAC, and if there is one
then it's not in a
mån 2015-03-16 klockan 11:13 +0100 skrev Hans de Goede:
I see, yes using olinuxino's embedded in factory devices is a valid reason,
so I will be happy to take patches for reading the MAC from the eeprom,
we will need to do some tests to make sure that we only do this on
valid eeproms though,
Le mardi 17 mars 2015 à 23:58 +0100, Paul Kocialkowski a écrit :
Le mardi 17 mars 2015 à 09:36 +0100, Hans de Goede a écrit :
Hi,
On 16-03-15 23:02, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Le lundi 16 mars 2015 à 14:45 +0100, Hans de Goede a écrit :
Hi,
On 16-03-15 13:31, Olliver Schinagl
Hey Paul,
On 16-03-15 23:09, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Le lundi 16 mars 2015 à 09:12 +0100, Hans de Goede a écrit :
Hi,
On 15-03-15 22:38, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
As far as I know, there is currently no mechanism in place to give each
device a unique serial number, that would be shown in
Le mardi 17 mars 2015 à 08:17 +0100, Olliver Schinagl a écrit :
Hey Paul,
On 16-03-15 23:09, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Le lundi 16 mars 2015 à 09:12 +0100, Hans de Goede a écrit :
Hi,
On 15-03-15 22:38, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
As far as I know, there is currently no mechanism in
Hey Iain,
On 17-03-15 01:38, Iain Paton wrote:
On 16/03/15 09:51, Hans de Goede wrote:
2) Are the eeproms prepolulated on ALL olinuxino-s ? If they are not
populated from the factory, I see little added value and I think I may
end up nacking any patches for this, but first lets hear your
Le mardi 17 mars 2015 à 09:36 +0100, Hans de Goede a écrit :
Hi,
On 16-03-15 23:02, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Le lundi 16 mars 2015 à 14:45 +0100, Hans de Goede a écrit :
Hi,
On 16-03-15 13:31, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey,
On 16-03-15 10:52, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
Oops,
Le lundi 16 mars 2015 à 09:12 +0100, Hans de Goede a écrit :
Hi,
On 15-03-15 22:38, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
As far as I know, there is currently no mechanism in place to give each
device a unique serial number, that would be shown in
e.g. /proc/cpuinfo. This can seem not very useful,
On 16/03/15 09:51, Hans de Goede wrote:
2) Are the eeproms prepolulated on ALL olinuxino-s ? If they are not
populated from the factory, I see little added value and I think I may
end up nacking any patches for this, but first lets hear your arguments :)
The eeproms are physically present on
Le lundi 16 mars 2015 à 14:45 +0100, Hans de Goede a écrit :
Hi,
On 16-03-15 13:31, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey,
On 16-03-15 10:52, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
Oops, missed a bit to reply to, see below:
On 16-03-15 10:04, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Also, which part of the SID do we
Hi,
On 16-03-15 13:31, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey,
On 16-03-15 10:52, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
Oops, missed a bit to reply to, see below:
On 16-03-15 10:04, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Also, which part of the SID do we want in /proc/cpuinfo? The one is bigger then
the other, though looking
Hey,
On 16-03-15 10:52, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
Oops, missed a bit to reply to, see below:
On 16-03-15 10:04, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Also, which part of the SID do we want in /proc/cpuinfo? The one is
bigger then the other, though looking at
http://linux-sunxi.org/SID_Register_Guide
Hi,
On 16-03-15 11:16, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey Hans,
snip
We will be using Lime2's which all have them, all lime's have them. Obviously
there will be a check, to check if there is a valid eeprom with valid data, but
for our product it will be required.
Since we will be flashing a
Hi,
On 16-03-15 10:56, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey Hans,
On 16-03-15 10:51, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 16-03-15 10:04, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey all,
On 16-03-15 09:12, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 15-03-15 22:38, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
As far as I know, there is currently no
Hi,
On 16-03-15 10:04, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey all,
On 16-03-15 09:12, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 15-03-15 22:38, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
As far as I know, there is currently no mechanism in place to give each
device a unique serial number, that would be shown in
e.g. /proc/cpuinfo.
Hi,
Oops, missed a bit to reply to, see below:
On 16-03-15 10:04, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Also, which part of the SID do we want in /proc/cpuinfo? The one is bigger then
the other, though looking at http://linux-sunxi.org/SID_Register_Guide there's
a lot of non-uniqueness that can be ignored
Hey,
On 16-03-15 11:21, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 16-03-15 11:16, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey Hans,
snip
We will be using Lime2's which all have them, all lime's have them.
Obviously there will be a check, to check if there is a valid
eeprom with valid data, but for our product it will
Hey Hans,
On 16-03-15 10:51, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 16-03-15 10:04, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey all,
On 16-03-15 09:12, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 15-03-15 22:38, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
As far as I know, there is currently no mechanism in place to give
each
device a unique serial
Le lundi 16 mars 2015 à 17:50 -0400, Stefan Monnier a écrit :
if necessary truncate the SID somehow.
Or hash it,
For some reason, I kinda like the idea of having the serial match
something directly readable in the hardware instead of something that
just looks about random. Furthermore, having
if necessary truncate the SID somehow.
Or hash it,
Stefan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For
Hey Hans,
On 16-03-15 11:13, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 16-03-15 10:56, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey Hans,
On 16-03-15 10:51, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 16-03-15 10:04, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey all,
On 16-03-15 09:12, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 15-03-15 22:38, Paul Kocialkowski
Am Sonntag, 15. März 2015 22:39:05 UTC+1 schrieb con...@paulk.fr:
Do you have any better idea to do this, or is there some reference that
I am missing?
Currently the MAC address in U-Boot is generated that way, see:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-June/181879.html
--
You
Hi,
On 15-03-15 22:38, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
As far as I know, there is currently no mechanism in place to give each
device a unique serial number, that would be shown in
e.g. /proc/cpuinfo. This can seem not very useful, but it would be
nice to have that for USB gadget drivers that make use
Hey all,
On 16-03-15 09:12, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 15-03-15 22:38, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
As far as I know, there is currently no mechanism in place to give each
device a unique serial number, that would be shown in
e.g. /proc/cpuinfo. This can seem not very useful, but it would be
30 matches
Mail list logo
