Sid Boyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everything works OK on 2.6.12-rc4. The joysticks are seen by lsusb and
the joystick test programs, but the controls do nothing in 2.6.12-rc5
and 2.6.12-rc5-git8.
# js_demo
Joystick test program.
~~
Joystick 0: CH PRODUCTS CH FLIGHT
Hi,
I have noticed that all USB input devices use the exact same
sequence to initialize input_id from usb device. Would anyone
object to the patch below?
The patch is RFC only since it is on top of some local changes
and may not apply to other trees...
--
Dmitry
Input: introduce
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 02:26:18AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi,
I have noticed that all USB input devices use the exact same
sequence to initialize input_id from usb device. Would anyone
object to the patch below?
The patch is RFC only since it is on top of some local changes
and
On Saturday 04 June 2005 02:32, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 02:26:18AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi,
I have noticed that all USB input devices use the exact same
sequence to initialize input_id from usb device. Would anyone
object to the patch below?
The patch is
On 6/3/05, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 03:37:01PM +0300, Kiril Jovchev wrote:
Please read Documentation/Submitting patches for how to do this
properly. Your patch was linewrapped, and you didn't have a good
Using Gmail to send was not probably a good idea.
Grant Grundler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:25:18PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
It seems that this problem has been around for some time.
I didn't check to see how long this code has been around.
It's in 2.6.10-pa3. Since the USB mouse and keyboard work in it,
some other change
[...]
Ok. Can you want to try the older version of
include/asm-parisc/unaligned.h?
Interesting, I will too
Sorry it didn't help for me (on a b180 with kernel 2.6.12-rc5-pa2 and
2.6.8/include/asm-parisc/unaligned.h)
still panicing as usual:
[101511b0] cache_grow+0xd8/0x1a8
[10151428]
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Grant Grundler wrote:
Yes, Kyle tracked it down to parisc switching from a parisc asm
definition of get_unaligned() to using the generic ones.
Ie we moved from avoiding kernel traps to exercising them.
But 64-bit kernel worked fine with USB.
And on 32-bit kernels le64()
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Dag Nygren wrote:
sda: Write Protect is off
sda: Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
sda: assuming drive cache: write through
sda:7usb-storage: queuecommand called
usb-storage: *** thread awakened.
usb-storage: Command READ_10 (10 bytes)
usb-storage: 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Parag Warudkar wrote:
On Friday 03 June 2005 16:57, Alan Stern wrote:
That may be a harmless artifact, arising because the OHCI driver is loaded
before the EHCI driver.
Trouble is when this error is in dmesg no USB device works (Mouse, Storage).
It happens
On Saturday 04 June 2005 11:15, Alan Stern wrote:
If you get rid of the EHCI driver entirely (for example, rename
/lib/modules/.../drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.ko to something else so that
modprobe can't find it), does the Unlink after no-IRQ? error still
occur?
I can try that - it brings in
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Parag Warudkar wrote:
On Saturday 04 June 2005 11:15, Alan Stern wrote:
If you get rid of the EHCI driver entirely (for example, rename
/lib/modules/.../drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.ko to something else so that
modprobe can't find it), does the Unlink after no-IRQ? error
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:50:57 +0300 Kiril Jovchev wrote:
| On 6/3/05, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 03:37:01PM +0300, Kiril Jovchev wrote:
|
| Please read Documentation/Submitting patches for how to do this
| properly. Your patch was linewrapped, and you didn't
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:06:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
In spite of the total overall number of changes required, wouldn't it be
much simpler to have a suite of routines (inlines or macros) like:
get_16, put_16, get_le16, put_le16, get_be16, put_be16
get_32, put_32,
On Friday 03 June 2005 10:41 am, Parag Warudkar wrote:
Also interesting is this line -
[ 40.586298] ohci_hcd :00:02.0: Unlink after no-IRQ? Controller is
probably using the wrong IRQ.
So did you investigate these IRQ setup problem, or just ignore
that pointed diagnostic?
Controllers
On Saturday 04 June 2005 15:12, David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 03 June 2005 10:41 am, Parag Warudkar wrote:
Also interesting is this line -
[ 40.586298] ohci_hcd :00:02.0: Unlink after no-IRQ? Controller is
probably using the wrong IRQ.
So did you investigate these IRQ setup
On Saturday 04 June 2005 11:50, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Parag Warudkar wrote:
I can try that - it brings in another issue - ohci-hcd hangs the system
for 2 minutes complete during calling pci_enable_device() for the
controller to which any storage device is attached -
randy_dunlap wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:50:57 +0300 Kiril Jovchev wrote:
| On 6/3/05, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 03:37:01PM +0300, Kiril Jovchev wrote:
|
| Please read Documentation/Submitting patches for how to do this
| properly. Your patch was
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 00:34:07 +0300 Kiril Jovchev wrote:
| randy_dunlap wrote:
| On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:50:57 +0300 Kiril Jovchev wrote:
|
| | On 6/3/05, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 03:37:01PM +0300, Kiril Jovchev wrote:
| |
| | Please read
randy_dunlap wrote:
The only problem that I see with it now is that it uses
spaces instead of tabs... so it won't apply cleanly,
since the original source uses tabs. That means that either
you used cut-n-paste to put the patch into email (which usually
destroys tabs) or your email client
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg == Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The IBM Ultraport camera driver for linux kernel version 2.6.10
(ultracam module) is now working for me, after quite a bit of
modification.
Greg Care to post your patches?
I haven't yet
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 01:20:58 +0300 Kiril Jovchev wrote:
|
| Lets see did I got it right this time.
Much closer this time, but there are 3 new/added lines
that still uses spaces instead of tabs. Marked below.
| --- linux-2.6.12-rc5/drivers/usb/media/stv680.c 2005-05-25
randy_dunlap wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 01:20:58 +0300 Kiril Jovchev wrote:
|
| Lets see did I got it right this time.
Much closer this time, but there are 3 new/added lines
that still uses spaces instead of tabs. Marked below.
This is my first patch. Sorry for the huge amount of e-mails.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg == Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The IBM Ultraport camera driver for linux kernel version 2.6.10
(ultracam module) is now working for me, after quite a bit of
modification.
Greg Care to post your patches?
I haven't yet
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:06:52AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
In spite of the total overall number of changes required, wouldn't it be
much simpler to have a suite of routines (inlines or macros) like:
get_16, put_16, get_le16, put_le16,
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 01:52:33 +0300 Kiril Jovchev wrote:
| randy_dunlap wrote:
| On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 01:20:58 +0300 Kiril Jovchev wrote:
|
| |
| | Lets see did I got it right this time.
|
| Much closer this time, but there are 3 new/added lines
| that still uses spaces instead of tabs.
26 matches
Mail list logo
