On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Peep Pullerits wrote:
> Apr 30 17:39:23 entropy kernel: usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using address 2
> Apr 30 17:39:24 entropy kernel: usb-storage: This device (0a17,0006,0100 S 05 P 01)
> has unneeded SubClass and Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h
> Apr 30 17:39:24 en
Apr 30 17:39:23 entropy kernel: usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using address 2
Apr 30 17:39:24 entropy kernel: usb-storage: This device (0a17,0006,0100 S 05 P 01)
has unneeded SubClass and Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h
Apr 30 17:39:24 entropy kernel:Please send a copy of this message
usb-storage: This device (054c,0025,0100 S 04 P 01) has unneeded SubClass and
Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h
It was after connecting Sony portable MP3 Player (don't know model name - I
was not mine).
--
---
This SF.Net email is sponsor
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Alexander Oltu wrote:
> Hello ,
> Previously, when I used kernel 2.4, I reported new device in unusual_devs.h
> (05e3,0701).
> Now I`m using kernel 2.6.1 and started to get this errors:
> Jan 15 08:47:40 lifebook kernel: usb-storage: This device (05e3,0701,0002 S
> 06 P
Hello ,
Previously, when I used kernel 2.4, I reported new device in unusual_devs.h
(05e3,0701).
Now I`m using kernel 2.6.1 and started to get this errors:
Jan 15 08:47:40 lifebook kernel: usb-storage: This device (05e3,0701,0002 S
06 P 50) has unneeded SubClass and Protocol entries in unus
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> I was excited there for a second, but that patch already made it into
> test8 which I'm running.
>
> I guess I should take this over the SCSI guys though. Thanks.
Yes, the patch is in -test8. I just tried it myself, plugging and
disconnecting a USB
Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
I was excited there for a second, but that patch already made it into
test8 which I'm running.
I guess I should take this over the SCSI guys though. Thanks.
Yes, the patch is in -test8. I just tried it myself, plugging and
disconne
On Saturday 18 October 2003 23:08, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Alan, thanks so much for all your help (as well as everyone else
> who's helped on this).
>
>One more 'bug' I've noticed... not sure if this is specific to this
>patch, or my recently upgraded
Alan Stern wrote:
It is a SCSI bug, and it was recently tracked down by Matthias Urlichs.
See
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=6252693
I was excited there for a second, but that patch already made it into
test8 which I'm running.
I guess I should take this over the SCSI gu
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> One more 'bug' I've noticed... not sure if this is specific to this
> patch, or my recently upgraded -test7 kernel, or...
>
> If I connect the camera it gets added at /dev/sda1. If I disconnect the
> camera, the usb drivers tell me:
>
> ~ Oct 18 20:0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan, thanks so much for all your help (as well as everyone else who's
helped on this).
One more 'bug' I've noticed... not sure if this is specific to this
patch, or my recently upgraded -test7 kernel, or...
If I connect the camera it gets added at /dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Stern wrote:
| You know, I think this is all my fault for not being sufficiently careful
| about that earlier patch. Phil, see if this fixes everything. That
| verbose usb-storage debugging probably won't be needed.
|
| Alan Stern
|
|
| --- a/dri
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> Alan Stern wrote:
> | Could you try running this with verbose usb-storage debugging turned on,
> | and post the debugging log? It may have some clues.
>
> Erm... is that a kernel compile option or an option to the driver...
> Sorry to be ignorant here,
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> It seems that this patch causes a problem. The sd_mod module still sees
> the device and gives:
>
> Oct 14 21:40:50 rider kernel: hub 1-0:0: debounce: port 2: delay 100ms
> stable 4 status 0x101
> Oct 14 21:40:50 rider kernel: hub 1-0:0: new USB device
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg KH wrote:
| Applied, thanks.
|
| greg k-h
It seems that this patch causes a problem. The sd_mod module still sees
the device and gives:
Oct 14 21:40:50 rider kernel: hub 1-0:0: debounce: port 2: delay 100ms
stable 4 status 0x101
Oct 14 21:40:50 rid
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:52:39AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
>
> > Alan,
> >
> > I tested the patch and it seems to work fine. Just to be clear, I was
> > lazy and my test consisted of the following, which to the best of my
> > knowledge should have been
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> Alan,
>
> I tested the patch and it seems to work fine. Just to be clear, I was
> lazy and my test consisted of the following, which to the best of my
> knowledge should have been a fine test:
>
> 1. manually edited unusual_devs.h to change 9009 to 500
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Stern wrote:
| That's a very good point. Phil, can you test the patch below and see if
| your device works okay with it? It's a lot simpler than the patch I
| proposed before.
Alan,
I tested the patch and it seems to work fine. Just to be clear,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 05:14:20PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Matthew Dharm wrote:
>
> > I have no real objection, tho someone should go back and test this without
> > the US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY to see if the new scsi_scan.c code fixes this.
>
> That's a very good point. Phil, ca
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> I have no real objection, tho someone should go back and test this without
> the US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY to see if the new scsi_scan.c code fixes this.
That's a very good point. Phil, can you test the patch below and see if
your device works okay with it?
I have no real objection, tho someone should go back and test this without
the US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY to see if the new scsi_scan.c code fixes this.
Matt
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 11:23:24AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
>
> > My kernel asked me to send this to th
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> My kernel asked me to send this to this address, so I am. =) 2.6.0-test5.
>
> Sep 24 23:12:34 rider kernel: usb-storage: This device (07cf,1001,5010 S
> 05 P 01) has unneeded SubClass and Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h
> Sep 24 23:12:34 rider kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My kernel asked me to send this to this address, so I am. =) 2.6.0-test5.
Sep 24 23:12:33 rider kernel: hub 2-0:0: 2 ports detected
Sep 24 23:12:33 rider usb.agent[16209]: missing kernel or user mode
driver usbcore
Sep 24 23:12:33 rider kernel: hub 1-0
As wanted in dmesg I send you the messages. If you need further
info, tell me.
I'm not on the list!
-Marc
usb-storage: USB Mass Storage device detected
usb-storage: act_altsetting is 0, id_index is 44
usb-storage: -- associate_dev
usb-storage: Vendor: Sandisk
usb-storage: Product: ImageMate SDD
24 matches
Mail list logo
