Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
I downloaded the smp kernel for Athlon with XFS and attempted to use the
irpm command recommended:
rpm -ivh kernelrpm.
However, it refuses to install because /sbin/installkernel conflicts with
the one from mkinitrd. What next - do I force it to install anyway? Thi
> Is that what the error message says?
Basically it couldn't mount device 8.0
>> What else do I have to do - do I have to link the modules-info and
>> System.map to the new smp modules. I must be missing something here.
>
> You need to create an initrd that contains at least the drivers for y
I'm really confused.
Gphoto says some cameras just come up looking like a file system when
you plug them into a USB port. Mine does this on machines running
Windoze. So presumably I don't need gphoto. Or do I?
All I can make of the docs on the USB hotplug stuff is that there's
stuff in there.
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:45:34PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> Well, I did that and it kind of worked - but I don't think the problem is
> with installkernel.
>
> I did the rpm -ivh --force kernel..rpm and it installed.
>
> I then added that to my lilo.conf as label SMP:
>
> prompt
> timeo
How do you upgrade from gcc 2.9x to 3.2? Can't that be a perilous path?
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 08:44:25AM -0600, Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
>> List
>>
>>I am trying to compile a library call AI Loom, seems it may require
>> g++ 3. What do I need to install other than g++ 3, an problems
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 08:44:25AM -0600, Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
> List
>
>I am trying to compile a library call AI Loom, seems it may require
> g++ 3. What do I need to install other than g++ 3, an problems here to watch
> out for.
gcc 3.x. 3.2 is better than the others in the series.
List
I am trying to compile a library call AI Loom, seems it may require
g++ 3. What do I need to install other than g++ 3, an problems here to watch
out for.
Thanks for any help cheers
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1
Well, I did that and it kind of worked - but I don't think the problem is
with installkernel.
I did the rpm -ivh --force kernel..rpm and it installed.
I then added that to my lilo.conf as label SMP:
prompt
timeout=50
default=Linux
boot=/dev/sda
map=/boot/map
install=/boot/boot.b
message=/boot/m
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 06:39:11PM -0800, Bob Hemus wrote:
> "Net Llama!" wrote:
> >
> > On 11/09/2002 05:53 PM, Bob Hemus wrote:
> > > "Net Llama!" wrote:
> > >
> > >>On 11/06/2002 07:03 PM, Bob Hemus wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > On 11/03/2002 06:52 PM, Bob Hemus wrote:
> >
> > Assuming t
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 09:26:57PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> I downloaded the smp kernel for Athlon with XFS and attempted to use the
> irpm command recommended:
>
> rpm -ivh kernelrpm.
>
> However, it refuses to install because /sbin/installkernel conflicts with
> the one from mkini
"Net Llama!" wrote:
>
> On 11/09/2002 05:53 PM, Bob Hemus wrote:
> > "Net Llama!" wrote:
> >
> >>On 11/06/2002 07:03 PM, Bob Hemus wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> On 11/03/2002 06:52 PM, Bob Hemus wrote:
>
> Assuming that this is an ISA modem, have you loaded the isapnp module?
>
> --
>
I downloaded the smp kernel for Athlon with XFS and attempted to use the
irpm command recommended:
rpm -ivh kernelrpm.
However, it refuses to install because /sbin/installkernel conflicts with
the one from mkinitrd. What next - do I force it to install anyway? This
is the only file that
EHLO,
This message is especially for Steve Rader, who was (rightfully)
complaining about the problem with I/O wait time monitoring. I just
noticed that the new procps (for recent 2.5 kernels) now shows the
I/O wait time distinct from vanilla idle time.
http://freshmeat.net/projects/procps/
Kurt
On 11/09/2002 05:53 PM, Bob Hemus wrote:
"Net Llama!" wrote:
On 11/06/2002 07:03 PM, Bob Hemus wrote:
>
On 11/03/2002 06:52 PM, Bob Hemus wrote:
Bob Hemus wrote:
--
Lonnie,
All this
"Net Llama!" wrote:
>
> On 11/06/2002 07:03 PM, Bob Hemus wrote:
>
> >>On 11/03/2002 06:52 PM, Bob Hemus wrote:
> >>
> >>>Bob Hemus wrote:
> >
>--
> > Lonnie,
> > All this for naught. It's an
I got it fixed.
There were no other files XF86Config or the -4 variant - they are all in
/etc/X11 except for a symlink to XF86Config in /usr/X11R6 so I killed that
symlink. Still wouldn't center.
Caldera's file did not work so I recreated a brand new XF86Config-4 from
xf86config. I then se
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:34:49 -0800 Tony Alfrey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just wondered since I've been using 2.95.2 to compile virtually
> everything and nothing blows up so far. But then the stuff I
> compile isn't all that exotic. Kernels, kde, and now some Palm
> stuff.
>
I'm not aware
On 11/09/2002 02:56 PM, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Saturday 09 November 2002 05:19 pm, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine
wrote:
On Saturday 09 November 2002 03:21 pm, Tim Wunder espoused:
BTW, How've you been Kantoine?
I am doing fine except for my bloody lousy memory, grin. But I wish I cou
My concern is not workload. Its simply that authors just about never
provide updates to either their submission or contact info.
On 11/09/2002 02:16 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 07:05:01AM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
It would be nice if the author notified the SxS editors and/
On Saturday 09 November 2002 05:19 pm, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine
wrote:
> On Saturday 09 November 2002 03:21 pm, Tim Wunder espoused:
> > BTW, How've you been Kantoine?
>
> I am doing fine except for my bloody lousy memory, grin. But I wish I could
> get this Suse to setup the broadban
yes. it will be a big task for the chief editor to adjust all sxs
articles to use indirect addressing for email id. :)
One possibility would be for the authors to have aliases at the SxS site so
that changes would only have to be made in one place.
--
.~.Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. In L
On Saturday 09 November 2002 03:21 pm, Tim Wunder espoused:
> On Friday 08 November 2002 05:01 pm, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine
> wrote:
>
>
> > ...BTW they have just released the 1.3
> > version of both office and plugin, much improved.
>
> According to www.codeweavers.com, plugin is only
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 07:05:01AM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
>It would be nice if the author notified the SxS editors and/or this
>list, however that rarely, if ever happens. I know there's a lot of bad
>emails, but its near impossible to fix them in most cases.
One possibility would be for the
I just wondered since I've been using 2.95.2 to compile virtually
everything and nothing blows up so far. But then the stuff I compile
isn't all that exotic. Kernels, kde, and now some Palm stuff.
On Saturday 09 November 2002 08:40 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> uhh...Collin, its gcc-3.2, not gcc-2.3
>From another mailint list, for those of you who like Xft:
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dchest/xfthack/
--
Commitment, n.:
Commitment can be illustrated by a breakfast of ham and eggs.
The chicken was involved, the pig was committed.
___
Linux-user
On Thu, 07 Nov 2002 15:16:29 +0800
"m.w.chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what kind of application did you write? mathematics only?
> any database and user-interface work?
limited database interaction for the application itself. The system (AIRS-Atmospheric
Infrared Satellite) has extensive da
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
I need to see if someone with a fast (256k+) line is willing to set up a
proxy server to proxy calls for DialPad.
This will not be a general use proxy. This is for perhaps 6-8 calls over
the next week. One or two to test, then a demonstratio
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 09:33:16AM -0700, Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:42:43 -0800 Tony Alfrey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 08 November 2002 02:32 pm, Ben Duncan wrote:
> > >
> > > All of these seems to be in the "rush" to go to the GCC 3.2
> > > compiler
> >
> > Why the ne
Ah thanks Lonnie ... I thought I had it wrong on calling it 3.2 .
Net Llama! wrote:
uhh...Collin, its gcc-3.2, not gcc-2.3.
On 11/09/2002 08:33 AM, Collins wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:42:43 -0800 Tony Alfrey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 08 November 2002 02:32 pm, Ben Duncan
uhh...Collin, its gcc-3.2, not gcc-2.3.
On 11/09/2002 08:33 AM, Collins wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:42:43 -0800 Tony Alfrey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 08 November 2002 02:32 pm, Ben Duncan wrote:
All of these seems to be in the "rush" to go to the GCC 3.2
compiler
Why the new com
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:42:43 -0800 Tony Alfrey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 08 November 2002 02:32 pm, Ben Duncan wrote:
> >
> > All of these seems to be in the "rush" to go to the GCC 3.2
> > compiler
>
> Why the new compiler?? What doesn't compile with 2.95.x ??
>
>
You might ask wh
I'll recheck the search path again to make sure I didn't miss any others
and then I'll copy the Caldera file across and see what happens.
Thanks to all.
> Yea, Tom has great advice. You should be able to reuse XF86Config*
> files across distros, assuming that they're all using the same versio
[ snips ]
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 22:49:44 -0500 Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I tried 8.1 on a couple of machines and then backed it off... Too
> many things broken, and too many changes I didn't want (like CUPS).
> Not all of the problems were SuSE's fault but other things that
> br
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:16:20PM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
>
> if the author of sxs-articles changed his/her email id,
> should they send an update? or just a notification to the chief editors?
> or just let it be? :)
I prefer the option that results in the least amount of work for
the editors. :
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 02:19:36AM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> I've just installed RH 7.3 on a system and need to adjust the screen so
> it's centered. I am running two system connected to a common
> monitor/keyboard via a KVM switch from BlackBox. One system is Caldera 3.1
> and it cente
It would be nice if the author notified the SxS editors and/or this
list, however that rarely, if ever happens. I know there's a lot of bad
emails, but its near impossible to fix them in most cases.
On 11/09/2002 06:16 AM, m.w.chang wrote:
if the author of sxs-articles changed his/her email id
Yea, Tom has great advice. You should be able to reuse XF86Config*
files across distros, assuming that they're all using the same version
of XFree86.
On 11/09/2002 05:18 AM, Tom Jandl wrote:
Search your system for more than one copy of XF86Config*.
man XF86Config tells the story of the search p
Bill
I am using 2 elsa a razor 2 & 3, both use the following in XF86Config-4:
Section "Device"
### Available Driver options are:-
### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False",
### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz"
### [arg]: arg optional
#Option "SWcurs
if the author of sxs-articles changed his/her email id,
should they send an update? or just a notification to the chief editors?
or just let it be? :)
--
.~.Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. In Linux we trust.
/ v \ news://news.hkpcug.org
/( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org
^ ^2.4.19 9:4
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 09:59:56PM -0600, steve rader wrote:
> > From: "David A. Bandel"
> > you'll want to avoid copying /proc and probably even /tmp. Look around
> > because there might be others you won't want to copy. Just be sure to
> > exclude them.
>
> Why?? My install script does cl
begin Tony Alfrey's quote:
| I happen to be on the suse list also (but don't use it much).
| Ever since 8.1 came out, the amount of angst and problems seem to
| have risen considerably on that list. For you suse'ers, is this
| just new users or does it seem that 8.1 might have been a little
| "
Search your system for more than one copy of XF86Config*.
man XF86Config tells the story of the search path xfree uses to find it.
Maybe you have more than one copy on your system & are editing the wrong
one. I copy my Caldera one into my Gentoo system, works great.
Tom Jandl
On Sat, 2002-11-09 a
42 matches
Mail list logo
