Many thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
Sent: 03 December 2002 14:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: New Step
It was updated yesterday. The old version was no longer accurate so it
was removed. Please look at the new
http://www.egovos.org/pdf/dodfoss.pdf
--
Doug Hunley
Linux/Unix Admin
These 3 guys walk into a bar. You'd think
one of them would have ducked
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On Sunday 01 December 2002 05:15 am, Net Llama! wrote:
Its also interesting to note that Linus personally removed all of the
scsi emulation crap from a very recent 2.5.x kernel. None of this
voodoo will be neccesary in 2.6.x kernels.
Do you happen to know what version of cdrtools allows
Hi,
I'm recovering from a major system fsck-up (portage kept uninstalling
everything after I'd installed it). I'm using kernel 2.5.50bk3, because none
of the stable kernels seemed to like my Highpoint 374 controller. and plain
old 2.5.50 wouldn't compile.
I've got the usblp module loaded,
Llama,
I think the question is why i'd want to go back to ext2?
I've never had
any need nor desire to revert to any other filesystem since
using XFS.
the fact that you'd even have a need to do it with ext3
speaks volumes
about its lack of maturity.
How about accessing the disk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Wunder spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
/etc/aliases, and I needed to run the newaliases command.
(I should really try stuff on my own before posting for help :-( )
it's *supposed* to be /etc/mail/aliases. obviously, RH mucked
I am running ACT! software via Crossovers Wine package rather successfully. I
have another user on the same computer I want to give access to the database
file, and also a bunch of documents.
Where is the best place to put this in the filesystem? I see a lot of places
that might work, but I
the stuffs in COL 3.1
m.w.chang wrote:
can you correct me? I knew you knew what I was actually talking about.. :)
errr...what's a 2.95.3 library??
--
.~.Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust.
/ v \ http://www.linux-sxs.org
/( _ )\ Linux 2.4.20
^ ^7:00am up 3 days, 17:46, 1
you meant if I install gcc-3.2.1 to my COL 3.1, recompile *JUST* the
proftpd daemon, and it would work without problem?
maybe my example is too easy... but I am no gcc expert.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:05:39AM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
yes, but what about all those
can you correct me? I knew you knew what I was actually talking about.. :)
Net Llama! wrote:
errr...what's a 2.95.3 library??
On 12/03/02 18:05, m.w.chang wrote:
yes, but what about all those 2.95.3 libaries? can 3.2.1 gcc binaries
work with older 2.95.3 gcc librarise? I heard that 3.2.x is
/temp is uually world read/writeable.. but not a good idea.. maybe a samba
share where only system users are allowed read/write access
Bill Day
Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586
6:10pm up 1 day, 9:11, 0 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
We're still up at irc.openprojects.net @ #linux-users
or
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 06:20 pm, someone claiming to be Harry G wrote:
I am running database program as a user. I have another user on the same
computer I want to give access to the database file, and also a bunch of
documents.
Where is the best place to put this in the filesystem? I
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 16:36, Bill Day wrote:
/temp is uually world read/writeable.. but not a good idea.. maybe a samba
share where only system users are allowed read/write access
I kind of like /home/public to share files with other users and /home/common
to house joint projects but
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:01:51PM -0500, Harry G wrote:
I am running ACT! software via Crossovers Wine package rather successfully. I
have another user on the same computer I want to give access to the database
file, and also a bunch of documents.
Where is the best place to put this in
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:00:22AM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
you meant if I install gcc-3.2.1 to my COL 3.1, recompile *JUST* the
proftpd daemon, and it would work without problem?
Yes, that's what I meant.
Kurt
--
Politics is like coaching a football team. you have to be smart enough
to
does it apply to everything? how about those that uses dynamic
libraries? I was unable to update libstdc++. If I keep the old one,
everyting will still work fine??
I am quite onfused by the library (not DLL) hell. I built libraries for
Foxpro applications. But whenever the Foxpro was upgrade,
anyone read the ftp-proxy article in november issue of linux journal?
do I need that with the capabilities of proftpd? I don't find any thing
special... that thing is more suitable for wu-ftpd.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~.in Linux we trust.
news://news.linux-sxs.org / v \
I am getting set to finally burn some cd's. I have a 48 speed CD-R
drive. I have only a vague idea what that means.
Here is a section of the man cdrecord regarding speed of writing:
==man cdrecord on speed
speed = # Set the speed factor of the writing process to #. # is an
integer,
I would think you wouldn't need a proxy unless you're trying to go through
a firewall and need something to translate local addresses or serve as your
proxy system.
anyone read the ftp-proxy article in november issue of linux journal?
do I need that with the capabilities of proftpd? I don't
I think you'll find that the 48 is the speed at which it reads. The unit
writes at a slower speed - how slow depends on the unit itself (the bus
it's on like IDE, SCSI, and how well made it is and the computer. Usually
the write speed is lower like 1,2,8,12x.
What is important is a speed at
Joel Hammer wrote
I would appreciate and English translation and some suggestions for
setting the speed parameter. If I understand this this means I can set
the speed of writing to 48. When I crank up the speed, either to 40 or
50, cdrecord says it is writing at speed = 32.
Does the type of
Just for the record,
The Sony 48x CR-R, 24x CR-RW, 48x CD-ROM (CRX215E1) works just fine in
linux, at least with CD-R data and CD-ROM. I used the latest cdrtools
(cdrecord, version 1.8 and mkisofs version 1.12.) It writes a cd (580
mbytes) in about 220 seconds or less with speed set to 40 and
Additionally the media you're burning to has a speed rating.
On 12/04/02 18:06, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
I think you'll find that the 48 is the speed at which it reads. The unit
writes at a slower speed - how slow depends on the unit itself (the bus
it's on like IDE, SCSI, and how well made it
You are right. On the package it says: 1X to 32X.
I guess that explains my top speed of 32.
Joel
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:39:54PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
Additionally the media you're burning to has a speed rating.
setting the speed parameter. If I understand this this means I can set
Just for the record,
Ahh.. The pain has stopped. It only took two short evenings to get this
working under linux. The scsi stuff is a pain. Knowing how to use modules
is a must. If I hadn't had to install a zip drive last year, another scsi
pretender, I would have been a lot longer
The men in the computer store (BestBuy, CompuUSA), smile and shake their
heads each time I ask about scsi cdrom's. Do they exist?
Joel
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:06:11PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Just for the record,
Ahh.. The pain has stopped. It only took two short evenings
On Thursday 05 December 2002 03:15 am, Joel Hammer wrote:
The men in the computer store (BestBuy, CompuUSA), smile and shake their
heads each time I ask about scsi cdrom's. Do they exist?
No, the men in CompUSA and BestBuy do not exist. Of course SCSI CDROM's
exist. I just can't afford a
Of course they exist, but BestBuy CompUSA isn't where you go to find a
decent selection of quality hardware.
On 12/04/02 19:15, Joel Hammer wrote:
The men in the computer store (BestBuy, CompuUSA), smile and shake their
heads each time I ask about scsi cdrom's. Do they exist?
Joel
On Wed, Dec
Yes, they do - check out Plextor for one, most others make them. I buy
them for performance. However, morons such as work at BestBuy and CompUSA
can't be expected to know about them. The only reason they IDE is they've
seen it on enough boxes for it to sink into their little brains. If you
Indeed. SCSI hardware is traditionally used in servers. People don't
purchase components for servers at BestBuy. Look on pricewatch.com or
pricegrabber.com for good prices on namebrand components.
On 12/04/02 19:24, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Yes, they do - check out Plextor for one, most
I got so I used SCSI for my workstations. It was worth the extra cost to
get the performance and ease of use.
Indeed. SCSI hardware is traditionally used in servers. People don't
purchase components for servers at BestBuy. Look on pricewatch.com or
pricegrabber.com for good prices on
Since the latest gnucash was released, I thought of give it a try. As it seems
that I was missing g-wrap I downkoaded the source and tried to compile it
only to bomb out with the following error:::
-- making all in g-wrap
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/g-wrap-1.3.2/g-wrap'
guile -c \
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:39:54PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
Additionally the media you're burning to has a speed rating.
Great point -- I've created more than a few coasters at work
because I neglected to heed the speed rating of the blanks...
Kurt
--
Minnie Mouse is a slow maze learner.
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:55:47PM -0800, Ted Ozolins wrote:
Since the latest gnucash was released, I thought of give it a try. As it seems
that I was missing g-wrap I downkoaded the source and tried to compile it
only to bomb out with the following error:::
-- making all in g-wrap
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:15:35PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote:
The men in the computer store (BestBuy, CompuUSA), smile and shake their
heads each time I ask about scsi cdrom's. Do they exist?
The guys at BestBuy and CompUSA are idiots. SCSI CD-ROMs better exist,
or a lot of workstations at my
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:21:24PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
Of course they exist, but BestBuy CompUSA isn't where you go to find a
decent selection of quality hardware.
Or a decent selection of knowledgeable sales personnel. ;-)
Kurt
--
Ah say, son, you're about as sharp as a bowlin' ball.
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 20:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Scheme file require.scm, apparently stored in slib.
Kurt
Hehe, I've compiled a lot of progs over the last year or so and believe me
this is the first time I've seen anything like this. This is a known problem
and in order to
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 20:15, Joel Hammer wrote:
The men in the computer store (BestBuy, CompuUSA), smile and shake their
heads each time I ask about scsi cdrom's. Do they exist?
Joel
Plextor definitely has the best reputation, their latest scsi cdrw being
a 12/10/32 or something like that
38 matches
Mail list logo
