I believe that was the AMD K5 or K6. :p
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:50:17 -0800
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many would argue that a Cyrix was equivalent to a 386. ;)
>
> On 01/30/03 20:21, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> > Unfortunately, not "lesser" enough to install on my Cyrix 6x86 P166
Many would argue that a Cyrix was equivalent to a 386. ;)
On 01/30/03 20:21, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
Unfortunately, not "lesser" enough to install on my Cyrix 6x86 P166+ or
120+... Authentic Pentium and above.
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:51:13 -0800
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are y
Dude, you have got to cut back on the caffeine... Or start smoking
again... or something.
What the @#$% did Chang do to chap your a55 so bad? The guy is looking to
use Linux as a server, so let him! The fact that it is great as a desktop
doesn't mean everyone is ready to make that jump. He has
Unfortunately, not "lesser" enough to install on my Cyrix 6x86 P166+ or
120+... Authentic Pentium and above.
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:51:13 -0800
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you sure that you have a compatible CPU? The Caldera server
> installations require a Pentium II or bett
write you back later tonight (HKT).
Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, m.w.chang wrote:
% thank you. that's my point.
%
% I would love someone to mail me his/her working cdrom via surface mail.
% I could afford a few USD.
Send me an address in private email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I'll
send
Feigning erudition, m.w.chang wrote:
% thank you. that's my point.
%
% I would love someone to mail me his/her working cdrom via surface mail.
% I could afford a few USD.
Send me an address in private email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I'll
send you copies of the CDs I burned.
Kurt
--
Boston, n.:
ok, I got no money or the right political environment to hire you.
anyway, this part of the thread was no longer related to my query on the
integrity of the iso.
Cut out this "your honor" BS. My full time job has nothing to do with
knowing how to burn a CD. I was hired because i knew Linux, n
possible...but he didn't manage the ftp server. he merely gave the orders.
I had to re-iterate the fact that I had never failed to boot a linux
iso burnt under Window$, your majesty. I meant all, except this COL
3.1.1.
Its probably Ransom Love's fault..
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~.
You Honour, could we go back to the original topic?
we were talking about the integrity on the COL 3.1.1. iso, not whether I
used a window$ or linux to burn the image.
ISO is the data format. you can question the compilance of Nero Burning
ROM to the linux cdr-record, but you shouldn't shift the
thank you. that's my point.
I would love someone to mail me his/her working cdrom via surface mail.
I could afford a few USD.
The point is that all of this discussion, other than helping Chang with
his actual problem belongs on the General list. The CD burning software
available on Windows and/
That's one of the more pathetic excuses i've heard lately.
I honestly wouldn't know how to burn a CD under windoze. THen again,
i'm not the one having problems using a CD burnt under windoze.
I had to re-iterate the fact that I had never failed to boot a linux
iso burnt under Window$, your
M. W. Chang wrote inter alia:
could someone burn it for me and mail me (in Hongkong) the cdrom over
snail mail?? :)
Try chguy.net. I've had good experiences here.
re CD burning: I installed Libranet 2.7 on my "new" P4 box last
night and updated XCDRoast. The latest Deb installs a version
Why, your beloved windoze can't check MD5SUMs??
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, m.w.chang wrote:
> of course not.
>
> Net Llama! wrote:
> > You verified the MD5SUM in windoze?
> >> but... execuse me, did they generate the md5sum from
> >>
> >> a. the authentic cdrom or
> >> b. the file on the server (which
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 21:49:58 -0800
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:44:55PM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
> >the point is whether it's a standard iso file or a linux-specific iso
> >file.
>
> Nothing Linux specific about it. I burn most of my ISOs on an Apple
> Pow
of course not.
Net Llama! wrote:
> You verified the MD5SUM in windoze?
>> but... execuse me, did they generate the md5sum from
>>
>> a. the authentic cdrom or
>> b. the file on the server (which may have been corrupted)
>>
>> ? :)
>>
>> when did you guys download the iso? My first download (do
You verified the MD5SUM in windoze?
On 01/26/03 23:05, m.w.chang wrote:
I did. The result is the same as the openlinux-workstation.md5sum file
published on the ftp server.
but... execuse me, did they generate the md5sum from
a. the authentic cdrom or
b. the file on the server (which may have b
On 01/26/03 20:17, m.w.chang wrote:
I paid $59.95 for COL 3.1 because of my respect for the original Caldera.
I paid 0 for my OS, how did you pay?
but yuo work full-time in linux and unix, I was working full-time in
Foxpro and DOS. hwo could you apply your belief over me, your honour?
Cut
I did. The result is the same as the openlinux-workstation.md5sum file
published on the ftp server.
but... execuse me, did they generate the md5sum from
a. the authentic cdrom or
b. the file on the server (which may have been corrupted)
? :)
when did you guys download the iso? My first downlo
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:16:12PM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
>that's really puzzling I pulled the image with wget. it pulled with
>binary mode, right?
Probably. Did you pull the file with md5sums and check the ISOs
against these?
>Bill Campbell wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:44:55PM +08
that's really puzzling I pulled the image with wget. it pulled with
binary mode, right?
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:44:55PM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
the point is whether it's a standard iso file or a linux-specific iso file.
Nothing Linux specific about it. I burn most
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:44:55PM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
>the point is whether it's a standard iso file or a linux-specific iso file.
Nothing Linux specific about it. I burn most of my ISOs on an Apple
PowerMac G4 running OS X 10.2.3. It happens to have the fastest burner
here.
Bill
--
INTERN
the point is whether it's a standard iso file or a linux-specific iso file.
Why burn in wintendo? what the heck is wrong with:
cdrecord -eject -v -data speed=XX dev=0,0 isoname.iso
where XX= whatever the speed (writing) of your burner is. Its faster,
cleaner and bug free. Why would you want
m.w.chang wrote:
I don't know how to burn a cd on linux.. (my last priority, frankly)
besides, it's not my first time to do it. gentoo, knoppix, COL 3.1
beta, COL 2.4 server, ... virtually all linux iso was burnt under
Window$. no error was ever found, excpet this COL 3.1.1. So it could
not b
I paid $59.95 for COL 3.1 because of my respect for the original Caldera.
I paid 0 for my OS, how did you pay?
but yuo work full-time in linux and unix, I was working full-time in
Foxpro and DOS. hwo could you apply your belief over me, your honour?
I received no official UNIX or Linux train
yes, after I figured out the ide-scsi things.. later. I didn't say it
was impossible.
could someone burn it for me and mail me (in Hongkong) the cdrom over
snail mail?? :)
As for burning .iso's under linux it's as easy as :
cdrecord dev=0,0,0 speed=4 somedumb.iso
No big deal... If you hav
it's a P3. so it should be fine. I had no idea why the COL 3.1.1 refused
to boot up, except a suspicious bad cd image The COL 3.1 worked fine
(ok, that one costed me US$ 59.95)
Are you sure that you have a compatible CPU? The Caldera server
installations require a Pentium II or better while
On 01/26/03 19:52, m.w.chang wrote:
for this, I had to disagree, your honour. It's freaking easy to burn a
cdr under Window$, esp if yuo used Nero Burning Rom. It occured to me
naturally.
I paid 0 for my OS, how did you pay?
Once I figured out the hardware issues on linux, I would say it migh
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:32:46 +0800 "m.w.chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know how to burn a cd on linux.. (my last priority, frankly)
>
> besides, it's not my first time to do it. gentoo, knoppix, COL 3.1 beta,
> COL 2.4 server, ... virtually all linux iso was burnt under Window$. no
for this, I had to disagree, your honour. It's freaking easy to burn a
cdr under Window$, esp if yuo used Nero Burning Rom. It occured to me
naturally.
Once I figured out the hardware issues on linux, I would say it might be
as easy to do it with command=line cdr burnign tools under linux. my
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:01:42AM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
>
>I downloaded the ISO image again. this time, I ran md5sum on it.
>same as the website. I copied it to Windows 2000 and burnt it with
>cdrwin 5. No error in the burning prodcess but it still didn't installed
>(saying that COL cannot be
On 01/26/03 19:32, m.w.chang wrote:
I don't know how to burn a cd on linux.. (my last priority, frankly)
That's one of the more pathetic excuses i've heard lately.
I honestly wouldn't know how to burn a CD under windoze. THen again,
i'm not the one having problems using a CD burnt under windoz
I don't know how to burn a cd on linux.. (my last priority, frankly)
besides, it's not my first time to do it. gentoo, knoppix, COL 3.1 beta,
COL 2.4 server, ... virtually all linux iso was burnt under Window$. no
error was ever found, excpet this COL 3.1.1. So it could not be Window$'
fault.
On 01/26/03 19:01, m.w.chang wrote:
I downloaded the ISO image again. this time, I ran md5sum on it.
same as the website. I copied it to Windows 2000
That was your first mistake.
--
~
L. Friedman
I downloaded the ISO image again. this time, I ran md5sum on it.
same as the website. I copied it to Windows 2000 and burnt it with
cdrwin 5. No error in the burning prodcess but it still didn't installed
(saying that COL cannot be installed on the machien. consult the .. brah...)
My very first
34 matches
Mail list logo
