and compatible with my system from a standard
location.
A current example:
1. While looking into Flash Player, I noted that Mozilla 1.2 is now
avaiable.
2. I marched off to the download page and discovered that RH8.0 rpms
are available, so I downloaded them.
3. rpm tells me that the mozilla rpm
;m looking for an easy way for anything new that comes out. I'm
still evaluating redhat from a practicality standpoint. As I
mentioned above, using gentoo I seldom had to wait more than a few
days (major packages like gnome, kde being the exception, and that's
because they're just
After upgrading!! never did get it to work before.
With the new files NO PROBLEM!!
Regards
Mike
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 16:50, Net Llama! wrote:
> After upgrading, or just in general??
>
> On 11/27/02 16:04, Michael Fakaro wrote:
> > Thanks for the heads up. flash finally works as a user a
Do you know if this fixes the problem of running flash from a remote xterminal?
Joel
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:13:56PM -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
> http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashplayer/special/beta/
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Look at apt-rpm. It is supposed to help keeping updated. I downloaded it
but haven't had time to check it out.
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:13:56 -0500 (EST) Net Llama!
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashplayer/special/beta/
>>
>
> Looks interesting, but I no
On 11/27/02 18:15, Collins wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:13:56 -0500 (EST) Net Llama!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashplayer/special/beta/
Looks interesting, but I note on the download page that the latest
requires Mozilla 1.1.
Most likely, that's what th
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:13:56 -0500 (EST) Net Llama!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashplayer/special/beta/
>
Looks interesting, but I note on the download page that the latest
requires Mozilla 1.1.
Does anyone know the answers to a few questions:
1> I current
After upgrading, or just in general??
On 11/27/02 16:04, Michael Fakaro wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. flash finally works as a user and not just
as root.
Regards
Mike F
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:13, Net Llama! wrote:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashplayer/special/beta/
--
~~~
Thanks for the heads up. flash finally works as a user and not just
as root.
Regards
Mike F
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:13, Net Llama! wrote:
> http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashplayer/special/beta/
--
Michael Fakaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
L
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashplayer/special/beta/
--
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com
On November 16, 2002 03:12 pm, Michael Fakaro wrote:
> the same problem after he updated his kernel. His Mozilla will only play
> as "root" now to, mine will sometimes load slow as I said but has since
>From the 1.2b release notes:
---
Multi-user installs: To install Mozilla for multiple users on
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 14:40, Net Llama! wrote:
>
> no, not really. i think redhat did something snarfy to their Mozilla.
Well I think your right!! another fellow from a Red Hat Newsgroup has
the same problem after he updated his kernel. His Mozilla will only play
as "root" now to, mine will som
On 11/16/2002 09:53 AM, Michael Fakaro wrote:
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 23:01, Net Llama! wrote:
Which sites have you tried?
www.stars-stripes.com is the one I'm at every day now
Well this morning I booted up started Mozilla and it froze
at the above page again, then my young son called me
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 23:01, Net Llama! wrote:
> >
> >>Which sites have you tried?
> >
> >
> > www.stars-stripes.com is the one I'm at every day now
> >
Well this morning I booted up started Mozilla and it froze
at the above page again, then my young son called me and I
went to help him when
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 23:01, Net Llama! wrote:
> Where did you get the version of Mozilla that you're running? If not
> from ftp.mozilla.org, perhaps you should try theirs. Who knows what
> redhat might have done.
It is from Red Hat, I'll try the Mozilla one and get back to you with the result
Where did you get the version of Mozilla that you're running? If not
from ftp.mozilla.org, perhaps you should try theirs. Who knows what
redhat might have done.
On 11/15/2002 11:10 PM, Michael Fakaro wrote:
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 22:38, Net Llama! wrote:
That's the version that i've been usi
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 22:38, Net Llama! wrote:
>
> That's the version that i've been using for months without a problem.
>
Wish I could say the same
> >
>
> Which sites have you tried?
www.stars-stripes.com is the one I'm at every day now
>
> >
> >
> >> Are you sure that mozilla is act
On 11/15/2002 10:42 PM, Michael Fakaro wrote:
Upgraded from what?
The exact version was 5.01 r48, came with RH8
Was a new version of flash released recently?
The version I downloaded today from Macromedia was 5.01 r50
That's the version that i've been using for months without a problem.
> Upgraded from what?
The exact version was 5.01 r48, came with RH8
> Was a new version of flash released recently?
The version I downloaded today from Macromedia was 5.01 r50
I was hoping it might run a website my kids like to go to play games
> And
> what do you mean by 'crashes'?
It
On 11/15/2002 10:21 PM, Michael Fakaro wrote:
Flash was working fine until I upgraded it tonight. (Why do I insist on
fixing things that aren't broken?) Now it crashes everytime I go to
www.stars-stripes.com (or any other flash site). So I deleted it, took
the original files of my spare computer
Flash was working fine until I upgraded it tonight. (Why do I insist on
fixing things that aren't broken?) Now it crashes everytime I go to
www.stars-stripes.com (or any other flash site). So I deleted it, took
the original files of my spare computer and it still crashes. I wiped
out every remnan
21 matches
Mail list logo
